Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff speaks at Los Angeles conference on Islam and the West

Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff dømt for at sige sandheden om pædofeten Muhammed

Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff er idømt en bøde på 480 euro (som hun nægter at betale), subsidiært 60 dages fængsel – for at have sagt, at Muhammed “havde noget med små piger”.

At udtale sig negativt om Muhammeds seksuelle forhold til børn er strafbart under østrigsk lov.

Henrik Ræder Clausen

Gregorius Nekschot stopper i øvrigt som tegner.

(Al Hadis, Vol. 2. p. 638) Abdur Rahman- b-Salem reported that the Apostle of Allah said, “You should marry virgins, and verily they are sweeter in tongue, more prolific in wombs, and easily satisfied with little.”

Den politiske forfølgelse af Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff for at fortælle sandheden om islam

Artikelserie på FrontPageMag.

Følg med her.

Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff – A Changing Europe

Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff om retssagen

“Et barn skal beskyttes”

Savefreespech Talen er fra i Lørdags, hvor hun talte i Hannover. Tilhørerne er 130 medlemmer af Rene Stadtkewitz’ nye parti “Die Freiheit”.

Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff i retten

Canadian Journalist John Robson om Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff og østrigsk lovgivning

Mark Steyn om Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff

“Alle disse lysende prikker i et Europa hvor mørket sænker sig”

Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff på video

Stampismen slår naturligvis lynhurtigt an i Herr A. Schicklgrubers fædreland.

Mark Steyn: “While North America’s shrinking commitment to its free-speech inheritance is shameful, in many parts of Europe it’s even worse. Like Geert Wilders, like Lars Hedegaard, like Ezra Levant, Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff should not be on trial. Let’s help her get a bit more media attention.“

Vi ved det ikke, men hvis det østrigske retsvæsen ligesom det nederlandske tillader folkelig indsigt har vi noget at glæde os til. Skueprocessen mod Geert Wilders er blevet et megahit på Internettet – specielt blogosfæren. Det lader til at man er ikke så lidt interesseret i at se ind i den fremtid som venter os alle. I skrivende stund er følgende blogs årvågne:

* Tundra Tabloids * Europe News * Politically Incorrect * The International Civil Liberties Alliance * Vlad Tepes * Gates of Vienna * 1389 * Mark Steyn

* Lawrence Auster * Infidel Bloggers Alliance * 180grader * Diana West * Hodjas Blog * Patriot’s Corner * Right Side News * Eticha

* Atlas Shrugs * Jihad Watch * Yid With Lid * Citizen Warrior * Tasty Infidelicacies * Het Vrije Volk * summer patriot, winter soldier * Here’s The Right Side Of It

* Irate, Tireless Minority * Behind The Black * The Blogmocracy * ACT! For America * Right Wing Death Bogan * Winds of Jihad * Western Rifle Shooters Association * Andrew Bostom

Med tak til Gates of Vienna, Henrik Ræder Clausen og Vlad Tepes.

Interview with Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff

Interview Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff -Berlin 03.10.2010

Mit Geert Wilders teilt Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff den wenig erfreulichen Umstand, wegen vermeintlicher Volksverhetzung angeklagt zu sein. Darüber tauschten sich die beiden nach der Berliner Rede von Wilders am vergangenen Samstag aus und verabredeten, sich gegenseitig über den Verlauf ihrer Verfahren zu informieren.

Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff ist für die BÜRGERBEWEGUNG PAX EUROPA Verteterin bei der OSZE, der Organisation für Sicherheit und Zusammenarbeit in Europa, und als Islamkritikerin häufig zu Vorträgen unterwegs. Bei einer dieser Veranstaltungen hatte sich eine linksgerichtete Journalistin eingeschlichen, fertigte eine Tonaufzeichnung des Vortrags an und zeigte sie an. Die Staatsanwaltschaft apportierte das Stöckchen ganz brav und stellte Strafantrag.

Es ist dort wohl noch nicht bekannt, dass es der Koran ist, der hetzt — und nicht derjenige, der daraus zitiert. Im Rahmen der BPE-Kundgebung am vergangenen Sonntag „Für Demokratie und Menschenrechte — gegen freiheitsfeindliche Ideologien” führten wir in Berlin ein Interview mit Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff.
Überweisungen aus Österreich:
Raiffeisen Zentralbank
Kontonummer: 42908021602
BLZ: 31500

Internationaler Zahlungsverkehr:
Raiffeisen Zentralbank in Österreich
IBAN: AT513150042908021602
BIC: RZBAATWW

Kontoinhaber: Öffentlicher Notar Mag. Martin Scheichenbauer, Hemmaweg 5, A-9342 Gurk

Zweck: Sabaditsch-Wolff

The Watchman: Is ISIS Winning Against The West?

On this week’s edition of The Watchman, we sit down with Islam expert Robert Spencer to discuss his new book, “The Complete Infidels’ Guide to ISIS.”

We also discuss ISIS among the Muslim refugees of Europe with Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff.

Are British police enforcing Sharia law?

Tankevækkende tale af Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff

Mark Steyn om deltids-pædofili

Den nye dyd for denne verdens stampister, Lars Barfødder, voldtægtsonkler, pædofile og alle andre politisk korrekte: vedholdenhed!

Mark Steyn: “Well, that’s what Perry Mason would have called it. But 21st century Europe is a long way from Erle Stanley Gardner. On Tuesday, in a story headlined “Austrian Court Upholds Islam’s Blasphemy Rules“, Nina Shea reported:

Today, Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff, a young Viennese mother, was convicted under section 283 of the Austrian penal code of vilifying religious teachings for her negative commentary on Islam in a lecture before a political-party gathering in Vienna; she was fined 480 Euros. Sabaditsch-Wolff, a diplomat’s daughter, had lived and worked for several years in various Middle Eastern Muslim countries, and at the lecture in question spoke critically of the treatment of women and the practice of jihad in Iran, Libya, and other places that she had lived in.

Frau Sabaditsch-Wolff’s case came up while I was off with various health issues, but I said a few words about it when I was in Ottawa. This was Austria’s contribution to the hottest trend on the Continent – heresy trials. Officially, Mrs Sabaditsch-Wolff and Geert Wilders and Lars Hedegaard are in the dock as heretics against post-Christian Europe’s new religion of “multiculturalism”. But that’s just a transitional stage. As I wrote of the Wilders trial: The good news is that the Openbaar Ministerie is doing such a grand job with its pilot program of apostasy prosecutions you’ll barely notice when sharia is formally adopted.

Elisabeth’s case attracted less attention than most of the others. In a follow-up, Nina Shea speculated as to why that might be: This is probably due to the fact that she is an ordinary person and not an acclaimed writer, politician, or celebrity (think Mark Steyn, Geert Wilders, and Brigitte Bardot) — the most prominent examples of the growing ranks of Western Europeans and Canadians who have faced legal problems for criticizing Islamic teachings. I think it’s also that Austria does not resonate in the imagination as a beacon of individual liberty in the way that the anglophone democracies and certain Continental countries do – or did. Nevertheless, this is a very dark decision. If Lars Hedegaard was acquitted on a technicality, Mrs Sabaditsch-Wolff was convicted on one. See if you can follow the judge’s “thinking“: The integration of Muslims is surely a question of particular public interest – you are allowed to be critical – but not incitement of hatred…

The language used in the seminars were not inciting hatred, but the utterances regarding muhammad and paedophilia were punishable. “Paedophilia” is factually incorrect, since paedophilia is a sexual preference which solely or mainly is directed towards children. Nevertheless, it does not apply to Mohammad. He was still married to Aisha when she was 18. It is a “denigration of religious teachings” and are found guilty and sentenced to 120 days, which approaches the minimum of € 480. So, although Mohammed deflowered Aisha when she was nine, it is “factually incorrect” to call him a pedophile because he was still hot for her when she was in her late teens? As a point of law, it’s not where you start, it’s where you finish – and you’re gonna finish on top! Does this judicial ruling apply to all Austrians partial to a piece of underage totty? For example, Wolfgang Priklopil:

The Austrian girl who was kidnapped at the age of ten and imprisoned for eight years in a dungeon-like basement room by a pedophile predator who committed suicide when she escaped last week… Whoa, whoa, hold up there. How can you say Herr Priklopil was a “pedophile” when he was still having sex with her when she was 18? And so were all his friends: A dormant investigation into one of Austria’s most notorious kidnap cases is likely to be reopened after suggestions that Natascha Kampusch, the schoolgirl who vanished for eight years, was not held in a cellar throughout her ordeal as had been widely believed and may have been the victim of a paedophile ring rather than of a lone perpetrator.

Hey, don’t worry, says an Austrian judge. It’s not a “pedophile ring” if she still turns you on a week after she reaches the age of consent. Or does this dispensation only apply to the Prophet (peace and get-out-of-jail-free cards be upon him)?  – In 1998, Terrence McNally wrote Corpus Christi, a hit Broadway play about a gay Jesus. Could you write one about a gay Mohammed? Or would that also be ruled “factually incorrect”? – During my difficulties with the “human rights” regime in Canada, Kathy Shaidle liked to taunt the state enforcers with the line “You’re not smart enough to tell me how to live.” They’re certainly too stupid to tell us what to think. Yet, in torturing logic and law and liberty in ever more inane ways, judges and prosecutors send a consistent message that makes perfect sense to Islamic imperialists – that Islam is hedged off from the norms of intellectual scrutiny that apply to any other ideology, and that in recognition of that privileged protection judges, prosecutors and governments are happy to toss core western values overboard.

This is a disgraceful decision. Elisabeth is appealing it, and she deserves your full support. – In related multiculti Euro-news: Swedish laws against forced marriages and child marriages are not effective, the country’s migration board stated…But what’s the big deal about that? I mean, it’s not like she’ll be a child forever, right?”

Smag for småpiger?

…så mas bare på! – EUSSR og §266b skal nok passe på imens…

Som undersåt borger i EUSSR får man konstant udvidet sine horizonter.  Da vore kære ledere inde på Christians Hoppeborg under føring af Anders “Fup” Rasmussen sidst tog røven på befolkningen og aflyste den lovede folkeafstemning om Forfatningstraktaten Lissabontraktaten glemte de – underligt nok – at lade den dertil indrettede presse oplyse den gemene hob om at hermed var der også indført en ny frihedsdimension. Selv dasbladet Samarbejds-Politiken – hvis specielle interesseområde ellers skulle berettige en fyldig omtale – forsømte at bringe den glædelige nyhed, nemlig at fra nu af var pædofili – seksuellle overgreb på børn – ikke alene tilladt, men også poiitisk korrekt. Hvortil kunne føjes, at dersom nogen tænker ilde herom, da er vedkommende hjemfalden til straf i henhold til “Rammeafgørelsen”, idet vore pædofile medborgere nu indlemmedes l den store gruppe af særligt beskyttede mindretal.

Denne beklagelige forglemmelse er der nu rådet bod på. Skueprocessen mod Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff blev afsluttet i går og dommen er ganske i overensstemmelse med såvel nævnte “Rammeafgørelse” som vor lokale kopi, §266b: enhver der har lyst til at voldtage børn kan frit gøre det – under forudsætning af at man ikke indskrænker sine seksuelle udfoldelser til udelukkende børn. En begrænsning, som selv læsere af Samarbejds-Politiken må kunne leve med. Som alle domme har også denne sit afsæt i konkrete tildragelser – i dette tilfælde hr. pædofet Mohammed’s voldtægt af en 9-årig pige. Han slipper for bebrejdende omtale i pressen og andre politisk korrekte kredse eftersom han vedblev med at voldtage hende også efter at hun var blevet 18 år gammel. Case Closed.

Pressemeddelelse fra Bürgerbewegung Pax Europa: “On February 15, 2011, Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff was sentenced to a fine of €480 for “denigration of religious doctrines” by Judge Bettina Neubauer in the Vienna Regional Court. She was acquitted of the original charge of ethnic incitement. The court based “denigration of religious doctrines” on the fact that Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff had characterized Mohammed as “pedophiliac” because — according to Islamic legend — he had sex with nine year-old Aisha. In the court’s view, this was “denigrating” because Mohammed did not have sex exclusively with children but also with grown women, and stayed with Aisha until his death when she was eighteen years old. So he was not inclined to pedophilia. It might be interesting to see whether this scandalous judicial interpretation could persist in regard to convicted child molesters in Austria. It is known that many of these child molesters were fathers of families at the time. This could therefore no longer legally be called “pedophilia.” – Elisabeth’s statement after the trial is clear: “Today is a sad day for my young daughter and for all other young girls.”

E-E-EDL !

England anses almindeligvis for tabt. Men som altid har man glemt at spørge arbejderklassen: English Defense League

Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff beretter om dagens EDL demonstration i Luton:

“What a day! – I am on my way home at the end of a day that will eventually find its place in the history books in the United Kingdom, and perhaps even in the rest of (free) Europe. What began two years ago with a small march protesting the Islamization of Luton has today culminated into a demonstration by nearly 6,000 people.

This demonstration, organized by the English Defence League and headed by its leader Tommy Robinson, brought together activists and protesters from all over the United Kingdom, Norway, Sweden, Holland, Germany, France, and Austria. There were men and women from all walks of life, young, old, students, laborers, mothers, fathers, tattooed football hooligans drinking beer after beer and chanting “We will never surrender” and singing “God save the Queen”.

There were veterans from the war in Afghanistan (“I am very disappointed in my country; I feel my country has let me down. There is no aftercare for those who have returned unscathed.”). There was a young man whose brother has just survived a mine blast in Afghanistan and felt he needed to show his support. There was also a Pakistani woman of Jewish origin who converted to Christianity a few years ago.

Most of all, there were those who came to voice their anger. And there was a lot of that anger. It was in the air, and could be felt very clearly.

Walking around the street where the protesters gathered, I looked into the faces of these lads, trying to find what the press keep describing as “hatred”. But I was unable to find any. The mood was a somber one, despite the high beer consumption, and the reason for that mood had a simple explanation: native Lutonians no longer recognize their own city. There are Muslim gangs running the streets, harassing women and girls. There is a city council which caters solely to the Muslim groups, giving in to their every demand, the latest one being — no surprise here — a mega-mosque to be built in the very near future. The Lutonians are no longer Lutonians, but strangers in their own city, the place where they were born and grew up.

And, perhaps most dangerous, they are no longer even heard by their elected officials. Instead, members of the EDL are branded as racists for saying they want England to remain English; for complaining about their children being served halal-slaughtered food in their schools; for not wanting shariah law to be established in Luton or anywhere else in England.

These brave men and women do not deserve to be labeled “racists” for defending their home country. In a normal world the otherwise silent majority would be lining the streets applauding them for their bravery, and thanking them for standing up for their hometown. But in today’s warped world, they are called “racists”, “xenophobes”, “fascists”, and many other less polite epithets.

Rabbi Nachum Shifren — who traveled to Luton all the way from California — and I were able to engage some of the press in discussions. The BBC appeared hopeless, as usual, with its reporter telling me, “But you can find all that in the Old Testament as well!”

Or the Reuters journalist who still believes that Islam can be reformed. I treated him to a short explanation of the closing of the gates of ijtihad. In any case, he failed to notice that if Islam is indeed in need of reform, then there is in fact already a major problem.

As the street filled with hundreds and hundreds of protesters waving their EDL flags and chanting their slogans, I made my way to the front of the demonstration. I was surprised to find these boys extremely friendly and charming when I asked them to make way for me. Some of them even recognized me and thanked me. Their kindness was unexpected and very welcome. However, I was even more surprised that, given the per-capita beer consumption, there were no outright drunks to be found. Yes, some may have been tipsy, but I did not feel threatened in any way. We were in agreement that we would rather have drunk Englishmen than Sharia imposed on England.

At 2 pm the march started. The push from behind was no longer containable; people wanted to move and express their anger and disappointment. The police were out in full force riding on horses. There were riot police with walkie-talkies and protective visors as well as the evidence-gatherers. Given the stories I had heard about their treatment of the EDL in the recent past, I was happy to see the indifference in the faces of the policemen and women. They were certainly cooperative and courteous, and they made me feel safe. Assisting the police was a massive force of EDL stewards, who appeared to have the situation under control.

One rather tense moment occurred when we passed beneath a bridge and there was shouting and commotion. “Traitor, traitor, we know you are a traitor,” some of the EDL lads shouted, and appeared to kick out a man who had infiltrated.

The march continued without further incident through the deserted center of Luton to St. George’s square, where a podium had been set up for the speakers. The square filled quickly with thousands of marchers and protesters waving their flags and chanting “E-E-EDL!”

Tommy Robinson then took the stage and gave one of his most engaging speeches, calling every member of the audience a hero for attending this rally. He also promised to resist the building of the proposed mosque in Luton. Tommy then introduced a mother whose story moved many of those hard boys to tears. She had lost her daughter to a Pakistani who had abducted her with his car, had an accident, and ran away leaving the car to burn, with the girl inside. What is especially monstrous about this is that this Pakistani man lied to rescuers about the presence of the girl inside the burning car, leaving her to burn alive. This man is now in prison, but due to be released soon “on good behavior.” The booing emanating from the crowd was loud and clear. Tommy promised to do everything in his power to prevent this man’s release. The mother then added that she has received a life sentence, and so should the Pakistani man.

It was hard for me to take the stage after this moving story. But my speech was very well received, and I was proud to be standing there in support of a grassroots movement. There was no violence that I was aware of, just as I had hoped.

And immediately after my speech I was whisked away by some bodyguards and escorted personally by Tommy to Warren, his uncle, who had kindly volunteered to drive me to the airport.

It was a huge honor to have taken part in this memorable day. I met many kind and engaging people, people so different from me, but who all share my vision of a sharia-free society. And I intend to support this group for as long as it takes for us to win.

Never surrender!”

Klippet fra Gates of Vienna

Rettidig Omhu – et kort intermezzo

“At vi er paranoide betyder ikke at de ikke er efter os“

Med rettens kendelse af 31.januar 2011 i Statens proces mod Lars Hedegaard er det slået fast at det herefter er strafbart at udtale sig offentligt om vor tids altoverskyggende problem, islam. Som den tilsvarende proces mod Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff i Østrig viser, er det end ikke muligt at citere ordret fra koranen ved et lukket møde – der kan nemlig være stampister til stede. Sådan har det været siden Folketinget – på ordre af EUSSR – ratificerede den såkaldte “racisme-paragraf”. Tinget konstaterede dengang at den danske §266b gjorde samme fyldest som “Rammeafgørelsen om Racisme og Fremmedhad” som fra og med årsskiftet er gældende i hele EUSSR. Det nye er blot, at Staten nu tager paragraffen i anvendelse med en nidkærhed, der alene friholder privat samtale i eget hjem. Denne enthusiasme vil ikke blive mindre med regeringen Schmidt-Søvndal. Hvor den nuværende, lethargiske justitsminister har ladet Statadvokaturen afvente anmeldelser fra trediepart, vil den nye – Zenia Stampe? – ikke nøjes hermed, men med ildhu kaste sig ud i en energisk forfølgelse af enhver dissident eller blot skeptisk debattør hvis meninger kan aflæses, aflyttes eller på anden måde konstateres.

Så vidt er det ikke kommet i skrivende stund. Men det er på vej. Og som altid når et totalitært regime forsøger at klamre sig til magten vil undertrykkelsen af det frie ord forstærkes og ramme flere og flere borgere – også udenfor den oprindelige kreds af dissidenter. Det skader derfor ikke at træffe nogle enkle forberedelser – fremfor at lade sig overrumple når tiden er knap eller det allerede er for sent. Vil man fremover kunne deltage i samfundsdebatten kan man glemme alt om de allerede nu stærkt (selv)censurerede aviser, tidsskrifter og æterbårne medier. Trykning af undergrundsaviser, flyveblade og lignende kommer dog først på tale, når det også lykkes stampisterne at lukke debatten på internettet. Eksemplet fra Ægypten – hvor man simpelthen “hev stikket ud” – kan ikke anvendes i Danmark eller andre højteknologiske samfund. Det ville omgående lamme alt, inklusive myndighederne selv. Man vil derfor tage andre, mindre drakoniske, men mere målrettede metoder i brug. De mest nærliggende vil vi gennemgå nedenfor – samt anvise nogle enkle forholdsregler som enhver borger bør tage allerede nu – dersom man ikke føler nogen særlig lyst til at blive vækket af det geskæftige stampist-politi – herefter for nemheds skyld kaldet Gestampo – klokken tre om natten:

Intet af det følgende er ulovligt og kan med enkle midler effektueres på kort tid:

A. Er man aktiv debattør med egen hjemmeside eller blog vil Gestampo kunne rette henvendelse til WEB-hotellet og få taget hele molevitten ned. Derfor bør man:

1. aldrig have WEB-hotel i Danmark – eller andre steder i EUSSR. Man bør foretrække USA hvor  ytringsfriheden er beskyttet af forfatningen. En liste over udenlandske WEB-hoteller kan findes her – eller man kan nemt google sig frem til et. De er desuden billigere end danske.
2. aldrig have sine ting liggende på et dk-domaine. Brug i stedet et internationalt, f.eks. domainer med endelsen net – org – nu – com – eller noget andet, blot ikke EUSSR-domainer.

B. Er man blot almindelig debattør som gerne vil deltage med kommentarer på andre blogs, bør man gøre sig klart, at stikkerne – stampisterne – læser med. Derfor:

1. Skriv aldrig under eget navn på blogs eller debatsider, man ikke er 100% sikre på. Ejeren af disse sider kan nemlig se ens IP-adresse og dermed lettere angive politisk ukorrekte kommentatorer til Gestampo. Opgiv heller aldrig e-mail-adresser, bopæl eller andre oplysninger som kan lette identifikationen.
2. Dersom man absolut ikke kan modstå fristelsen til at kommentere på fjendens blogs, herunder avisernes debatsider, bør man i det mindste bruge et pseudonym, et alias – “nom de guerre” – samt gøre det fra en anonym e-mail-konto, f.eks gmail.
3. Er man alligevel blevet afsløret, vil myndighederne – inden man skrider til arrestation – henvende sig til ens internet-leverandør (ISP) og få lukket forbindelsen – man bliver altså “smidt af nettet”. Men så længe man ikke er i spjældet og kan gå frit omkring behøver man ikke af den grund føle sig lukket ude af debatten. Man kan f.eks. bruge en lille “netbook” eller en laptop og logge sig på andres routere – eller de efterhånden mange, åbne “hot spots”.
4. Så længe man har adgang til andres computere – f.eks. hos familie og venner – kan man jo låne deres. Men dermed risikerer man dels at bringe også dem i fedtefadet, dels vil almindelige computere “logge” hvad der foregår, så ejeren vil få svært ved at forklare sig når Gestampo har konfiskeret maskinen.
5. I den situation er det bedst at gå rundt med sin egen computer på sølle 5 gram i bukselommen – bogstavligt talt. Det lyder måske mærkeligt, men man kan simpelthen installere et fuldt, flunkende og funktionsdueligt operativsystem med net-adgang, browser, mail og hele pivetøjet på enten en CD, en DVD eller en af disse billige USB-dimser. Starter man en hvilkensomhelst computer op fra et sådant medie kører det ganske vist lidt langsommeligt, men man undgår helt at røre maskinens harddisk. Det hele foregår fra skiven eller dimsen. Og efterlader dermed ingen spor af ens aktivitet eller tilstedeværelse overhovedet. Her er to metoder:
   • CD/DVD: Man brænder simpelthen et fikst og færdigt operativsystem ned på skiven fra en såkaldt iso-fil. Der findes utallige linux-udgaver af sådanne. For linux-folket er den slags barnemad, men også Windows-brugere kan uhyre nemt brænde sig en live Linux-CD/DVD. Nogle populære iso-filer kan findes her og her. Det er vistnok også muligt at brænde en live Windows-CD – se evt. her. Mac-folket er nødt til at bruge Linux. Man lægger så blot skiven i en hvilkensomhelst computer når den starter og vips….
   • USB: Denne metode er den bekvemmeste, idet den intet fylder. Også her “brænder” man sit flunkende operativsystem med hele molevitten ned på USB-dimsen – Akkurat som var det en CD/DVD. Med linux er det fod i hose, Windows-folket kan gøre som ovenfor beskrevet – og muligvis endda installere Windows på dimsen ved at følge denne vejledning. Den maskine man ønsker at bruge, skal blot kunne boote fra USB – og det kan undertiden kræve at man indstiller dens BIOS. Det gøres ved at trykke F!, F2, F8 eller Esc lige efter starten og så vælge USB som første boot-medie. Så kører det deruda’

Civil ulydighed? – Ikke spor! – Ovenstående er såmænd blot begyndelsen på den samizdat-tilværelse vi er godt på vej ind i. Med mindre vi altså emigrerer….

Først kom de efter…

Ein Gespenst geht um in Europa: das Gespenst des Stampismus

Allerede inden man er færdig med skueprocessen mod Geert Wilders tager man fat må de lidt mindre fisk. “Der Process” mod Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff er nu berammet til at begynde i slutningen af november. Skulle nogen ikke være klar over hvem hun er kan man klikke på hendes navn herover. Der er nu dannet et internationalt konsortium til støtte for hendes forsvar. Elisabeth er desuden en kær ven af undertegnede og desårsag vil vi – helt undtagelsesvist – genposte følgede fra en postering den 15. december 2009:

EUSSR har mange dagsordener. De fleste er overtaget direkte fra forgængeren, Det Tredie Rige. Således også hele det juridiske kompleks. Første-prioriteten er her afskaffelsen af ytringsfriheden. Selv inden Det Fjerde Rige har nået at oprette sit Ministerium for Sandhed er man i gang. I første omgang lader man derfor de enkelte generalgouvernementer tage sig af det fornødne. I Holland er man startet med Geert Wilders. Han kan meget let gå hen og blive den næste statsminister, og hvis ikke man kan standse ham med argumenter, kan man jo putte ham i fængsel ved hjælp af de dertil indrettede love mod Volksverhetzung [© A. Hitler].

Noget tyder dog på, at fængslerne snart må opgives på grund af forstoppelse. Så må man igen gribe til gammelkendte løsninger, såsom lejre. Sådanne har man erfaringer med i Østrig. Så i dette generalgouvernement er man ikke så kræsen. Da Jörg Haider allerede er død, har man kastet sig over en kendt blogger, feminist og islamkritiker, Elisabeth Sabadtisch-Wolff. Vi har omtalt ouverturen HER og HER.

Hun står nu tiltalt for racisme, idet hun har holdt tre seminarer om kvindernes stilling under islam. Som altså ifølge eliten er en race. I præcise, saglige vendinger har hun gjort rede for Sharia-loven og dennes indstilling til kvinder. Men da sandheden altid er ilde hørt, må den kvæles. Akkurat som obsternasige kvindfolk. Og alle andre obsternasige, for den sags skyld.

Hvis nu nogen at vore hjemlige feminister skulle have lyst til at høre, hvad de ikke må sige, kan man orientere sig herom ved at se denne video, som er del 3 af Elisabeth’s foredrag. Har man endvidere lyst til at træffe hende personligt, kan man blot sige det samme. Så vil man – i henhold til Den Europæiske Arrestordre – blive transporteret til Østrig på statens regning. Og – hvis man er heldig – indlogeret i samme KZ-Frauen-Lager som Elisabeth.

Man kan læse mere om sagen på Ethica, Gates of Vienna og Snaphanen (scroll lidt ned på siden). Og vil man støtte Elisabeth, som har kolossale udgifter til advokater, kan man enten bruge PayPal på ovennævnte side eller denne: International payments: Raiffeisen Zentralbank Österreich , IBAN: AT513150042908021602, BIC: RZBAATWW , Made out to: Public Notary Mag. Martin Scheichenbauer, Hemmaweg 5, A-9342 Gurk, Österreich.

“I want to preserve Europe and its democratic and secular values”: Austrian freedom fighter charged with “hate speech”

Free Speech Death Watch Alert: “Interview with Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff,” by S.M. Steinitz for profil (Austria’s equivalent to “Time” magazine and “Der Spiegel”):

“I Am Against Dialogue”

A criminal complaint is being filed against Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff for “hate speech” under Austrian law, essentially the same thing that Susanne Winter was convicted of early this year.

Elisabeth gave a presentation about Islam at an FPÖ-organized seminar, and said some of the usual things that anti-jihad advocates say when they talk about Islam. A left-wing magazine, which had planted someone in the audience, caused charges to be brought against her at the same time as they publicized it in their magazine.

Elisabeth held the controversial Islam Seminar at the FPÖ-political academy. Charges of defamation of a religious group have been filed against the daughter of a diplomat. This is her only interview in which she explains her views.

Læs interviewet på Jihad Watch

…og således begyndte det.

Også for venstrefløjen er ytringsfriheden vigtig. Så vigtig, at den omgående må afskaffes.

Næppe er blækket på Forfatningstraktaten Lissabontraktaten tørt, før de enkelte stater provinser i EUSSR vejrer morgenluft og implementerer den. Navnlig har pressens mundvand længtes efter de ny censurlove, og ny flyver spyttet fra apparatcihkkerne, mens fråden står om munden på savskærere og domstole. I Holland skal lederen af landets næststørste parti, Geert Wilders, gøres tavs. I Østrig starter man en anelse mere beskedent med en kendt blogger og feminist (som jeg personligt kender og beundrer). Men sagen skal ikke få lov til at gå upåagtet hen, så længe det – endnu – er muligt at bruge frie medier, d.v.s. internettet. Som Baron Bodissey skriver:

Tager man til orde mod islamiseringen vil man før eller siden pådrage sig dhimmi-etablissementets vrede. Enhver. der stikker snuden lidt frem om det emne, får hovedet revet af. Således også for Elisabeth. Hun dristede sig til at sige et par sandheder om islam. Derfor har hun nu, ligesom Geert Wilders og i hundredevis af andre europæere, stiftet bekendtskab med sit lands hate-speech love og slæbes for en domstol. Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff blev i går interviewet af S.M.Steinitz fra Østrigs største nyhedsmagasin, Profil: (svarende til Time Magazine eller Spiegel). – Interviewet bringer vi her sammen med Gates of Vienna, Politically Incorrect og Jihad Watch:

“I Am Against Dialogue”

A criminal complaint is being filed against Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff for “hate speech” under Austrian law, essentially the same thing that Susanne Winter was convicted of early this year.

Elisabeth gave a presentation about Islam at an FPÖ-organized seminar, and said some of the usual things that anti-jihad advocates say when they talk about Islam. A left-wing magazine, which had planted someone in the audience, caused charges to be brought against her at the same time as they publicized it in their magazine.

Elisabeth held the controversial Islam Seminar at the FPÖ-political academy. Charges of defamation of a religious group have been filed against the daughter of a diplomat. This is her only interview in which she explains her views.

Mrs. Sabaditsch-Wolff, are you afraid of Muslims?

No, I am afraid of political Islam, which is massively gaining influence in Europe. That is what I am against.