Aktivister overdriver skader på Great Barrier Reef

The chairman of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Russell Reichelt says that activist groups are distorting surveys, maps and data to exaggerate the coral bleaching on the reef.

The bleaching affects 22% of the reef and is mostly localized to the far northern section, which has good prospects of recovery.

Two reef groups are in conflict. One is Reichelt’s GBR Authority, and the other is a special “National Coral Bleaching Taskforce” run by a guy called Terry Hughes. The Australian media was overrun with stories last week about how a report was censored to hide the damage. What was under-reported was the conflict and the propaganda.

The real problem appears to be that yet another agency was set up to find a crisis, and their existence depends on finding one. The Taskforce was set up in October last year.

We have the largest coral reef structure in the world, but sometimes the ABC can’t find a picture of bleaching from it, instead using an image from Samoa (top right). Greenpeace used the same trick.

Læs mere om svindelen her

Oops… ‘scientists’ overlooked effect of ‘dead zones’ on coral reefs. Not global warming. Not ocean acidification.

“Ægte” miljø-aktivister efterlader kæmpe affaldsregning

Svineri – havde du forventet noget andet ?

Send regningen til alle de miljø, der stod bag protesterne og lad dem betale

Taget herfra, hvor du kan læse hele historien

Endnu en myte: Flydende plastikøer i verdenshavene

Last week Kip Hansen’s “An Ocean of Plastic” thoroughly debunked myths about the “great garbage patch”.

But who created this story? Like many of the scary stories of our time, it came from the interaction of actual science with activist scientists and clickbait-seeking journalists. It is an example of how real problems become masked by myths, leaving us divided and unable to respond. To make this a self-contained post, it repeats some material covered by Hansen.

Nu er det videnskabeligt bevist: Vi er psykisk syge!

Svensk studie fastslår: Klimatförnekelse kan vara psykisk störning

Tillhör du dem som tvekar på att nordpolen snart har smält och att halva Sverige snart befinner sig under vatten? Då lider du förmodligen av en “trångsynt” och “kallhamrad personlighet” med “låg empati”, enligt en svensk studie från Uppsala universitet.

OPDATERING: Hvordan får forskerne lige dette her passet ind i deres konstruktion?

“Kun Dansk Samling viser vejen væk fra katastrofen”

Morten Uhrskov fortæller, hvorfor kun Dansk Samling kan løse flygtningeproblemet

Han pointe med to ultimative krav er – desværre – helt korrekt

Taget herfra

107 Nobelprismodtagere anklager Greenpeace for ‘forbrydelser mod menneskeheden’

More than 100 of the world’s leading scientists just took a major stand in the debate over genetically modified organisms (GMO), by penning an open letter to Greenpeace and others who actively campaign against the use of GM crops.

In particular, the scientists called Greenpeace out for publicly opposing golden rice – a GM crop that has the potential to save millions of lives each year by reducing vitamin A deficiency in the developing world.

“How many poor people must die before we consider this a ‘crime against humanity’?“

GrinPis = GreenPeace til grin !

De skulle vise hvor “gode” de var ved at “protestere” mod fracking på jord, de var forbudt at betræde

Bonden, der havde retten til grunden, benyttede lejligheden til at vise, hvad han mente om de politisk korrekte
nyttige idioter 🙂

sikke en omgang gylle … 🙂

Greenpeace-lovbryderne kan prise sig lykkelige over at bonden ikke havde købt noget af den israelske stink-vædske, som araberne virkelig frygter 🙂

Taget herfra, hvor du kan læse mere

Tænk, hvis alle “behandlede” greenpeace-lovbryderne sådan, hver gang de skulle vise , hvor gode de er…

Hver fjerde indsamlet krone går til udgifter

I Sverige må en organisation ikke samle ind, hvis den over tre år bruger mere end 25 procent.

Den grænse overskrider mange danske organisationer – herunder Blå Kors, Dansk Flygtningehjælp, Greenpeace og WSPA.

Mere på metroXpress

Greenpeace grundlæggeren Patrick Moore melder Greenpeace til FBI

Greenpeace, in furtherance of what is in effect its war against every species on the planet, has now turned to what, on the face of things, looks to me like outright breach of the RICO, wire-fraud, witness-tampering and obstruction-of-committee statutes. I have called in the FBI.

Greenpeace appears to have subjected Dr Will Happer, Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics at Princeton University, to a maladroit attempt at entrapment that has badly backfired on it.

The organization I co-founded has become a monster. When I was a member of its central committee in the early days, we campaigned – usually with success – on genuine environmental issues such as atmospheric nuclear tests, whaling and seal-clubbing.

When Greenpeace turned anti-science by campaigning against chlorine (imagine the sheer stupidity of campaigning against one of the elements in the periodic table), I decided that it had lost its purpose and that, having achieved its original objectives, had turned to extremism to try to justify its continued existence.

Now Greenpeace has knowingly made itself the sworn enemy of all life on Earth. By opposing capitalism, it stands against the one system of economics that has been most successful in regulating and restoring the environment.

[…]

I am profoundly dismayed that the organization I founded – an organization that once did good work addressing real environmental concerns – has descended to what I consider to be criminality and also proposes to descend to libel.

Accordingly, I have decided to inform the Federal Bureau of Investigation of Greenpeace’s dishonest and disfiguring attempt at entrapment of Professor Happer, whom I know to be a first-rate scientist, one of the world’s half-dozen most eminent and experienced physicists, and one who would never provide any scientific advice unless in his professional opinion that advice was correct.

The organization’s timing was clearly intended to spring the trap on Professor Happer hours before he was due to appear in front of Congress. This misconduct constitutes a serious – and under many headings criminal – interference with the democratic process that America cherishes.

I have reported Greenpeace to the FBI under 18 USC 96 (RICO statute); 18 USC 1343 (wire fraud); 18 USC 1512 (tampering with a witness due to appear at a Congressional hearing); and 18 USC 1505 (obstruction of proceedings before committees).

I shall also be asking the Bureau to investigate Greenpeace’s sources of funding. It is now an enemy of the State, an enemy of humanity and, indeed, an enemy of all species on Earth.

Læs historien på Wutts Up With That

Mere om Patrick Moore

Indien smider Greenpeace ud af landet på grund af svindel

Canada just elected our Greenpeace government. India just ordered Greenpeace to shut down over fraud.

Greenpeace has declared war on India’s economy, trying to shut down industrial developments like coal mines and nuclear power. So, pretty much opposing any electricity for India, where hundreds of millions live in poverty.

Patrick Moore forklarer, hvorfor han dannede Greenpeace og hvorfor han forlod den !

GreenPeace var oprindeligt en idealistisk organisation. Det er den ikke mere !

 Videoen er fra Prager University .

 

 Patrick Moore har skrevet bogen: Confessions of a Greenpeace Dropout: The Making of a Sensible Environmentalist. Beatty Street Publishing Inc. ISBN 978-0-9864808-2-9

 Den er værd at læse !

 Her er et link til en video, hvor Ezra interviewer Patrick Moore

 Her er et link til 4 andre interessante videoer om emnet klima og miljø fra Prager University

Canadisk læge der har turneret med Greenpeace mod tjæresand er afsløret som svindler

Fort Chipewyan, Alberta doctor John O’Connor became something of a progressive “green” hero after he claimed that the high number of cancer rates in his community was tied to the oil sands.

After he was fired, the media tried to link his dismissal to his role as a “whistleblower.”

But Ezra Levant of TheRebel.media has a leaked document from the College of Physicians and Surgeons that tells a very different story.

O’Connors løgnehistorier har været brugt af Dansk National Geographic (link på DR) , Information, Greenpeace (bilag i Folketinget).

Dr. John O’Connor is a liar.

Ezra giver O’Connor mulighed for at forsvare sig:

Greenpeaces ødelæggelser på Nazca linierne

Greenpeace ødelægger peruvianske Nazca linjer for at promote sig selv

Ægte Greenpeace arrogance og mangel på respekt: hensigten helliger midlet …

Den peruvianske regering vil nu restforfølge vandalerne.

Som en embedsmand skrev;

“Mr Castillo added: ‘They are absolutely fragile. They are black rocks on a white background. You walk there and the footprint is going to last hundreds or thousands of years.
And the line that they have destroyed is the most visible and most recognised of all.”

Taget herfra

LEGO har rygrad som en regnorm

Lego har i dag meddelt, at legetøjsgiganten ikke vil forlænge det samarbejde med Shell, som har kørt i de sidste par år.

Beslutningen kommer efter en kampagne som Greenpeace har ført mod Lego – med det formål at ramme Shell.

This isn’t the first time Lego bowed to Greenpeas pressure.  Maybe they hope Greenpeas won’t notice that Lego bricks are made of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene terpoloymers and is rather connected to the petrochemical industry. A company is not allowing a petrochemical company to hand out set of toys made from petrochemicals? This has got to be the most ironic situation I have seen in a long time. Let’s see how far Greenpeace would get without any oil for their ships, planes, and cars. No less the medications, clothes, food and many other items used in daily life, even in Europe. Maybe it is time to put them all on an island for a true low impact resistance.

Mere på Junk Science

Se dette interview med Greenpeace’s grundlægger Patrick Moore – han river dem totalt fra hinanden. Interviewet er fyldt med guldkorn. Alene denne: “Greenpeace vil forbyde halvdelen af det Periodisk System”. Og – Greenpeace vil ikke diskutere med ham – for de har ingen modargumenter.

Spring evt over de første 11 minutter.

Klimahystaderne kommer snart med en ny rapport… (opdateret)

Og så ved vi jo at MSM helt ukritisk vil agere papegøjer

 IPCC, FNs klimapanel har ikke engang udgivet rapporten endnu.

Men de har selvfølgelig lækket den.

Og TV2′ “journalister” gør, som de bliver bedt om og bringer et totalt ukritisk indlæg, der – som sædvanligt – maler fanden på væggen.

TV2 nævnte ikke med et eneste ord at der ikke har været nogen stigning i den gennemsnitlige temperatur på jorden de sidste 17-18 år !
Eller at samtlige klimamodeller inkl. FN har skudt helt over målet.

For hvis man bringer den slags fakta, så kunne det danske folk jo tro at det bare var hysteri.

Hvis du vil vide mere om emnet, har Synopsisolsen gjort et stort arbejde med at oversætte en glimrende artikel, hvor Patrick Moore, – en af grundlæggerne af GreenPeace, dengang det var en miljøorganisation og ikke en venstreorienteret troesretning – fortæller om hvorfor man ikke kan stole på klimahystaderne (mit ordvalg)

Få lidt modgift ved at læse artiklen her

Jeg ville gerne have kopieret hele artiklen, men jeg er ikke helt sikker på om Synopsisolsen synes det er ok. Så du må klikke på ovenstående link – det fortjener det.

TV2 er ikke det eneste medie, som helt ukritisk maler fanden på væggen og ikke modererer på nogen måde.

Bare se Ekstrabladet her, som har klippet et indlæg fra Ritzau . EB burde vide bedre.

En lille update: en professor trækker sig, fordi rapporten blev for alarmerende,
Læs her

Greenpeace-aktivister og Pussy Riot benådet

Russlands president Vladimir Putin har benådet de to fengslede Pussy Riot-aktivistene samt 30 Greenpeace-aktivister.

Ezra Levant interviewer Patrick Moore, Greenpeace’s grundlægger, idag modstander

Greenpeace ændrede sig til en religiøs gruppe ved at blæse på videnskab

 Patrick Moore har skrevet bogen :

Confessions of a Greenpeace Dropout: The Making of a Sensible Environmentalist. Beatty Street Publishing Inc. ISBN 978-0-9864808-2-9

Den har jeg anskaffet og læst – den kan bestemt anbefales til alle med en videnskabelig interesse i økologi.

Interviewet med Ezra er relativt langt, men til gengæld kommer han ind på
hvad Greenpeace stod for oprindeligt og hvad der fik han til at undsige greenpeace i detaljer.

Moore er nu tilhænger af kernekraft.

Jeg har tidligere vist en anden video med Patrick Moore:

Grundlæggeren af Greenpeace undsiger nu Greenpeace

Patrick Moore, som var med til at starte Greenpeace, har skrevet en bog “Confessions of a Greenpeace Dropout: The Making of a Sensible Environmentalist”, hvori han gør op med Greenpeace og menneskeskabt global warming

Her et et link til Erza Levants indslag om ham og Greenpeace

RAF regeringen vil lægge store biler for had bl. a. på grund af CO2-påvirkningen

Consider the effect of the realisation of the Greenpeace dream: the owners of every single SUV in the United States – all 28.3 million of them – trading in their vehicles for an average compact, the former to be sensitively destroyed (or delivered to deserving Mongolian film teams).

According to the DoE figures, to do so would result in a savings of 2.6 tons (9.8 vs 7.2) of per vehicle CO2 equivalent per year, for a total of 74 million tons (67.3 million metric tonnes). Given the total US level of 7.122 billion tonnes annually (PDF), our analysis reveals that American emissions after the big SUV trade-in would decrease by less than one percent, to 99.0554% of their previous levels. Global emissions of 28 billion tonnes would decline to a mere 99.7597% of the original total.

In other words, it is inconceivable that even this impossibly extreme response to the Greenpeace anti-SUV campaign would have the slightest effect on climate change this century. It’s clear in light of the numbers that to maintain otherwise is irrational – if one is indeed motivated by environmental considerations.

Fra en tidligere Hodja post.

Så er det man spørger – de danske tal er selvfølgelig en del mindre – hvor stor er CO2 besparelsen på at udskifte bilparken? Har det overhovedet nogen effekt i det samlede billede af den danske CO2 produktion? Det er selvfølgelig, hvis man overhovedet tror på, at CO2 har nogensomhelst betydning.

Eller er det et udslag af, at når man ikke kan få indført millionærskatten, så kan man ramme de ‘rige’ på bilerne?

Vi giver det sidste ord til Greenpeacegrudlæggeren Patrick Moore:

“Since I left Greenpeace, I have seen the movement drift into extremism, abandoning common sense and logic. To a large extent, it is being hijacked by activists who are using green rhetoric to launch agendas that don’t have much to do with ecology.”