Hodjanernes Blog

8 marts 2017

“Kan det hvide hus pressekorps holde til Donald Trump’s energi” ?

Det interessante spørgsmål stiller – og besvarer – FoxNewsLou Dobbs her

Anledningen er at Washington Post stiller dette spørgsmål:

Du skal hoppe hen til 19:08

Morsomt at høre de “stakkels” “journalister” klage over ødelagte weekends fordi de skal følge med Donald Trump’s tempo 🙂

Men det var vel også meget nemmere for pressen at holde øje med Obama spille golf …

7 marts 2017

Mark Levin Kicks Liberal Media’s Ass On Their Own Trump Wire Tap Reporting – Sean Hannity

Mark Levin: Obama Knew About Alleged Trump Wiretaps ‘Unless He’s Helen Keller’

– Radio host Mark Levin said Monday that it’s all but assumed that former President Barack Obama knew about campaign-season wiretaps of Trump Tower, as reported in several news outlets. Levin, a former chief of staff to Reagan Attorney General Ed Meese, said that if a FISA court warrant was secured, as reported, Obama was either told in his daily intelligence briefings or was given a “heads-up” by someone else.

Mark Levin: ‘Donald Trump Is the Victim’ in Alleged Obama Wiretapping Scandal

‘This Is McCarthyism’: Trump Tweets Obama Had ‘Wires Tapped’ Inside Trump Tower

He also said, citing several reports that numerous agencies within the Justice Department, intelligence community and Treasury Department were investigating the intelligence reports.

“I assume Obama knew something unless he’s Helen Keller,” Levin said. “That’s a hell of a lot of agency resources.”

Levin said by tweeting about the reports that accumulated over the past several months, President Trump has caused the media to “pivot” from alleging contact between his campaign and the Russians to deciding whether the Obama administration was involved in collecting the information that led them to their previous reportage.

“The media is confounded and confused,” Levin said, “If former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper says there was no FISA order, then what the hell are we talking about?”

Levin said the media was initially concerned with whether Trump associates had nefarious contact with the Russians.

“Now they’re saying we didn’t have a FISA warrant,” he said.

“If I’m reading these news reports, we have a runaway executive branch, and today the media doesn’t appear to know,” Levin said, demanding that the FISA order and warrants, be released to Congress.

Mere om overvågning

Tucker DESTROYS Democratic Congressman on Trump Wiretapping – Jim Himes

Trump’s wiretapping tweets, the media and reality

Brian Lilley paints a picture that shows the media are ignoring their own reporting in order to call Trump a liar and conspiracy theorist over his wiretapping concerns.

25 februar 2017

Bu-hu, Trump nægtede fake-news CNN og New York Slimes til pressemøde

Og MSM er straks op på mærkerne

selection_010

CNN ville ikke vide, hvad fakta er , om så fakta bed CNN i r….

Og New York Slimes klynker også :

selection_012

men New York Slimes har lige “glemt” alle de møder med Obama, hvor f.eks. Fox News IKKE var inviteret med, fordi Fox News ikke lavede lokumsaftaler med Obama …

selection_013

Ud over CNN og The New York Times var også the Los Angeles Times, Politico, BuzzFeed, the BBC ogd the Guardian udelukket til fordel for andre medier, som ikke normalt er/var med

msm-ego

Den bedste kommentar til MSMs hykleri fandt jeg på

“ja først vil de gerne svine ham i kor, og nu tuder de i kor :)”

Den sidder bare lige i øjet 🙂

Jeg glemte at notere mig hvor, hvor jeg fandt den, men jeg huskede at klippe den 🙂

MSM har travlt med at hykle at det her er et anslag mod pressefriheden, hvilket selvfølgelig er det rene VÅS

De udelukkede fake-news medier er alle kendt for stort set aldrig at skrive et postivt ord om Trump

INGEN forhindrer dem i at skrive, hvad de vil,
og vi ved at de vil fortsætte deres konsekvente fake-news om Trump – bare ikke fra det hvide hus 🙂

Taget herfra, hvor du kan læse mere

16 februar 2017

Støt Donald Trump

trump_help

9 februar 2017

2016 var det varmeste år nogensinde – eller? Fake news?

They say that mathematics is the language of science, which is a way of saying that science is quantitative.

It is moved forward by numbers and measurements, not just by qualitative observations. “It seems hot out” is not science. Giving a specific temperature, measured by a specific process at a specific time, compared to other systematically gathered measurements—that is science.

So when you read an article proclaiming that, for the third year in a row, last year was the hottest year on record, you might expect that right up front you will get numbers, measurements, and a statistical margin of error. You know, science stuff. Numbers. Quantities. Mathematics.

And you would be wrong.

7 februar 2017

Piers Morgan hos Tucker Carlson – han lyder næsten helt fornuftig

6 februar 2017

Anti-Trump snigmorder porno på forsiden af europæiske magaziner

3 januar 2017

New York Slimes laver fake news !

NYT kan ikke lide Trumps nye ambassadør i Israel og tilskriver ham et falsk citat!

screenhunter_299-jan-03-12-57

Ja, det er den “avis”, so alle venstreorienterede synes er sååå god …

New York Slimes kan ikke lide den nye ambassadør, fordi den nye ambassadør kan lide Israel !

Derfor svinede NYT ham til i ikke mindre end 4 artikler på samme dag

Han er “hard-liner”, “Right-wing”, imod (den ikke eksisterende) tostatsløsning, o.s.v

Men New York Slimes “journalist” Mathew Rosenberg kom med denne:

screenhunter_299-jan-03-12-58

“Uheldigvis” for New York Slimes er dette “citat” frit opfundet

Den kommende ambassadør David Friedmann har aldrig sagt denne sætning

Og det er dem, der gerne vil have monopol til at afgøre, hvad der er fake-news …

new-york-slimes

Taget herfra, hvor du kan læse mere
og her

17 december 2016

New York Slimes profit er faldet med 95.7% og nu bides hestene

New York Slimes må nu forlade mindst 8 etager af deres kæmpe skyskaber …

Sikke dog nogle overraskelser : jeg troede at fake-news-MSMs flagskib New York Times var så vellidt … men det er måske kun af andre fake-news-MSM-medier ?

screenhunter_294-dec-17-10-08

screenhunter_294-dec-17-10-12

New York Slimes har måttet erkende at man kun kan sælge politisk korrekte fake-news,
hvis man er betalt af staten via licens !

new-york-times-biased

Læs mere her, her og her

15 december 2016

DanMarx Radio plejer at være glad for den venstreorienterede journalist John Pilger – nu har de glemt ham

Hvorfor mon?

11 december 2016

Rudy Giuliani forklarer, hvorfor han ikke ville være minister

Og det mens MSM “udnævner” Rex Tillerson som USAs næste udenrigsminister

Interviewet med Rudy Giuliani varer ca 14 min:

Hvis man ellers kan stole på MSM ( og det kan man kun sjældent), vil Trump udnævne Rex Tillerson som USAs næste udenrigsminister

Tillerson er kendt som chef (CEO) for Exxon Mobil og for sit gode forhold til Putin og Rusland

Her er en meget kort CBS video ( uden lyd , eller rettere, med noget plink-plok musik i baggrunden)

Her er ABCs lettere perfide beskrivelse af Tillerson

Det interessante er nok til sidst, hvor de “udnævner” Bolton som viceudenrigsminister
Det er et godt valg, fordi Bolton ved meget om udenrigspolitik og kombinationen Tillerson + Bolton vil være god 🙂

Imens fortsætter MSM deres hetz mod Trump
Forleden bragte New York SLIMES en artikel med overskriften : er Trumps regering kvindefjensk ?
På det tidspunkt havde Trump allerede udnævnt 3 kvinder i sin kommende regering
Nu er Trump oppe på 5 – flere end Obama havde : Ihh, hvor er Trump dog kvindefjensk …

screenhunter_293-dec-11-08-58

8 december 2016

Hannity interviewer Gingrich om CNN:

“CNN startede til venstre og bevægede sig mere til venstre” !

cnn-corrupt-news-network

Gingrich siger også: New York Times ER fake news !

7 december 2016

New York Slimes læserbrevsredaktør får ørene i maskinen

Hun bliver interviewet af Fox News Tucker Carlson 🙂

Det er ret morsomt at se hende vride og vende sig og overveje hvert svar

At New York Slimes kun er vellidt blandt venstreorienterede, fremgår bl.a. af denn nekrolog !
shuchman

Taget herfra

Updateret:

Her haler hun i land igen : der var alligevel ikke “outrageous” at tweete så eensidigt mod Trump …

Standard new York Slimes vendekåbe

selection_332

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/york-times-public-editor-walks-144638042.html

22 november 2016

Selv New York Slimes egne læsere protesterer over NYTs politiske bias

Nu viser det sig at FEM gange hyppigere end normalt har NYTs læsere protesteret mod smudsavisens åbenlyse partiskhed mod Trump:

selection_271

new-york-times-biased

Taget herfra

Efter valget af Trump påstod NYTs ejer minsandten at smudsavisen havde givet et fair og balanceret dækning af valget !! samt at NYT ville fortsætte i samme spor … !

Her er et link til en artikel, som – ikke overraskende – viser at New York Slimes intet har lært: business as usual

16 november 2016

Alan Dershowitz forsvarer Steve Bannon

Kudos til Dershowitz, som ikke er Trump tilhænger, men en fornuftig person

http://www.breitbart.com står der at man overvejer en at lægge injuriesag an mod en stor MSM TV station

Jeg håber de gør det og at MSM tvinges til at betale en kæmpe erstatning

Magen til ikke alene udokumenteret, men også tydligvis falsk hetz mod en person skal man lede længe efter

Og det er ikke kun MSM i USA
MSM i Danmark kopierer lystigt fra ritSAUs svinerier
Jeg har ikke set et eneste MSM fortælle noget, der taler i mod hetzen

Det eneste positive er at http://www.breitbart.com får mange flere hits, da folk selv vil undersøge sagen, idet de ved at man ikke kan stole på MSM

11 november 2016

Det frådende respons på Trumps sejr viser præcis hvorfor han vandt

If you want to know why Trump won, just look at the response to his winning.

The lofty contempt for ‘low information’ Americans. The barely concealed disgust for the rednecks and cretins of ‘flyover’ America who are apparently racist and misogynistic and homophobic. The haughty sneering at the vulgar, moneyed American political system and how it has allowed a wealthy candidate to poison the little people’s mushy, malleable minds. The suggestion that American women, more than 40 per cent of whom are thought to have voted for Trump, suffer from internalised misogyny: that is, they don’t know their own minds, the poor dears. The hysterical, borderline apocalyptic claims that the world is now infernally screwed because ‘our candidate’, the good, pure person, didn’t get in.
This response to Trump’s victory reveals why Trump was victorious. Because those who do politics these days — the political establishment, the media, the academy, the celeb set — are so contemptuous of ordinary people, so hateful of the herd, so convinced that the mass of society cannot be trusted to make political decisions, and now those ordinary people have given their response to such top-down sneering and prejudice.

Oh, the irony of observers denouncing Middle America as a seething hotbed of hatred even as they hatefully libel it a dumb and ugly mob. Having turned America’s ‘left behind’ into the butt of every clever East Coast joke, and the target of every handwringing newspaper article about America’s dark heart and its strange, Bible-toting inhabitants, the political and cultural establishment can’t now be surprised that so many of those people have turned around and said… well, it begins with F and ends with U.

The respectable set’s allergy to Trump is fundamentally an allergy to the idea of democracy itself. To them, Trump’s rise confirms the folly of asking the ignorant, the everyday, the non-subscribers to the New York Times, to decide on important political matters. They’re explicit about this now. In the run-up to election day, big-name commentators wondered out loud if democracy is all it’s cracked up to be. Trump’s ascendancy showed we need better checks and balances on ‘the passions of the mob’, said Andrew Sullivan. We should ‘cool and restrain [these] temporary populist passions’, he said, and refuse to allow ‘feeling, emotion’ to override ‘reasoned deliberation’. The little folks only feel and wail, you see, and it’s down to the grown-ups in the system to think coolly on their behalf.

Elsewhere, a writer for the New York Times asked Americans to consider installing a monarchy, which could rise above the ‘toxic partisanship’ of party politics — that is, above open, swirling, demos-stuffed political debate. In a new book called ‘Against Democracy’ — says it all — Georgetown philosopher Jason Brennan argues for an epistocracy, an ‘aristocracy of the wise’, who might decide political matters for those of us who are ‘low information’ (ie. stupid). This echoes the anti-democratic turn of liberals in the 2000s, when it was argued that daft, Bush-backing Americans increasingly made decisions, ‘not with their linear, logical left brain, but with their lizard, more emotional right brain’, in Arianna Huffington’s words. Such vile contempt for the political, democratic capacities of the ordinary person has been in great evidence following Trump’s win — across Twitter and in apocalypse-tinged instant responses — and it is likely to intensify. Anti-Trump will morph more explicitly into anti-democracy.

If this all sounds familiar, that’s because it’s the same kind of pleb-fearing horror that greeted the Brexit result four months ago. ‘Why elections are bad for democracy’, a headline in the Guardian said. The people are deluded and it is the task of those with ‘reason and expertise’ to ‘un-delude’ them, said a writer for Foreign Policy. ‘What if democracy doesn’t work? What if it never has and never will?’, wondered a pained George Monbiot. Boom. That’s it. The secret and not-so-secret cry of the elites and the experts and the observers over both Brexit and Trump is precisely that: ‘What if democracy doesn’t work?’ It’s not so much Trump they fear as the system that allowed him to get to the White House: that pesky, ridiculous system where we must ask ordinary people — shudder — what they think should happen in the nation.

The anti-Brexit anti-democrats claimed they were merely opposed to using rough, simplistic referendums to decide on huge matters. That kind of democracy is too direct, they said. Yet now they’re raging over the election of Trump via a far more complicated, tempered democratic system. That’s because — and I know this is strong, but I’m sure it’s correct — it is democracy itself that they hate. Not referendums, not Ukip’s blather, not only direct democracy, but democracy as an idea. Against democracy — so many of them are now. It is the engagement of the throng in political life that they fear. It is the people — ordinary, working, non-PhD-holding people — whom they dread and disdain. It is what got Trump to the White House — the right of all adults, even the dumb ones, to decide about politics — that gives them sleepless nights

This nasty, reactionary turn against democracy by so many of the well-educated both explains the victory of Trump, which neatly doubles up as a slap in the face of the establishment, and confirms why democracy is more important today than it has ever been. Because it really would be folly, madness in fact, to let an elite that so little understands ordinary people, and in fact loathes them, to run society unilaterally. Now that would be dangerous, more dangerous than Trump.

Fra The Spectator via No-Pasaran

24 oktober 2016

Clinton News Network og andre MSM dækker Project Veritas

Damage control

Og mere damage control:

Top Clinton Strategist Discusses Project Veritas Action Videos With George Stephanopoulos

George Stephanopoulos and Eric Trump Discuss Project Veritas Action Videos

Al Sharpton Tries To Discredit Project Veritas Action Videos

21 oktober 2016

Paul Watson retter et direkte og velfortjent angreb på MSM

Og han lægger – som sædvanligt – ikke fingrene imellem 🙂

msm-lies

Nu, hvor der kun er godt 2½ uge til valget, begynder MSM at komme med nogle Hillary kritiske indslag, her et om Apple og Google’s “samarbejde” med Hillary :

20 oktober 2016

Til MSM

Older Posts »