Hodjanernes Blog

21 marts 2017

Epidemiologiske studier over luftforurening er utroværdige


Læs mere på Junk Science og læs Steve Milloys bog “Scare pollution” – den kan anbefales.

Som jeg så ofte har skrevet: epidemiologi er statistik, der intet sikkert siger om årsager, det fatter journalister ikke.

Læs mere om The Secret Science Reform Act, der kan vende hele forskningen om luftforurening på hovedet.

Aktivister overdriver skader på Great Barrier Reef

The chairman of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Russell Reichelt says that activist groups are distorting surveys, maps and data to exaggerate the coral bleaching on the reef.

The bleaching affects 22% of the reef and is mostly localized to the far northern section, which has good prospects of recovery.

Two reef groups are in conflict. One is Reichelt’s GBR Authority, and the other is a special “National Coral Bleaching Taskforce” run by a guy called Terry Hughes. The Australian media was overrun with stories last week about how a report was censored to hide the damage. What was under-reported was the conflict and the propaganda.

The real problem appears to be that yet another agency was set up to find a crisis, and their existence depends on finding one. The Taskforce was set up in October last year.

We have the largest coral reef structure in the world, but sometimes the ABC can’t find a picture of bleaching from it, instead using an image from Samoa (top right). Greenpeace used the same trick.

Læs mere om svindelen her

Oops… ‘scientists’ overlooked effect of ‘dead zones’ on coral reefs. Not global warming. Not ocean acidification.

17 marts 2017

“Ægte” miljø-aktivister efterlader kæmpe affaldsregning

Svineri – havde du forventet noget andet ?

Send regningen til alle de miljø, der stod bag protesterne og lad dem betale

Taget herfra, hvor du kan læse hele historien

2 marts 2017

Leonardo DiCaprio is a Complete Idiot

24 februar 2017

Interview med Steve Milloy forfatter til ‘Scare Pollution’

EPA er USA’s superaktivistiske miljøagentur Environmental Protection Agency.

EPA står bag junk forskning i bl.a. luftforurening, som er medvirkend51lat5pxpfl-_sx322_bo1204203200_e til enorme unødvendige udgifter for den vestlige verden.

Steve Milloy har stillet myndighederne i USA overfor et kæmpe dilemma. EPA går officielt ud og siger (EPA administrator Lisa Jackson som vidnede overfor en underkommitte fra House Energy and Commerce Committee 22. september 2011):

“Particulate matter causes premature death. It doesen’t make you sick. It’s directly causal to dying sooner than you should”

Samtidig har Milloy med ihærdigt arbejde gennem flere år påvist, hvordan EPA har fået gennemført illegale forsøg på mennesker (inklusive børn) med udsættelse for meget store doser luftforurening uden at informere forsøgspersonerne om risikoen for bl.a. at dø.

Så systemet har kun 2 muligheder: ENTEN er luftforurening ikke så farlig, som EPA påstår (hvilket er Milloys egentlige ærinde), og så kan myndighederne ikke regulere ‘luftforurening så rigidt, som de gør, ELLER EPA og adskillige amerikanske universiteter (som modtager i 100-vis af millioner dollar fra EPA til forskning) har overtrådt alle medicinske etiske regler for menneskeforsøg, som er blevet indført efter ‘Lægeprocessen’ ved Nürnbergdomstolen efter 2. Verdenskrig. Hertil kommer de læger som har udført forsøgene og de videnskabelige tidsskrifter, der har udgivet dem.

Der findes ikke andre muligheder.

Der er selvfølgelig ingen i Danmark, der har refereret sagen, som naturligvis også har betydning for dansk miljøforskning og -lovgivning. Man er for eksempel i gang med tiltag, der skal lægge afgifter på alle brændeovne i landet, og måske på længere sigt forbyde dem.

Mere om JunkScience

Congress is reading ‘Scare Pollution’… are you?

9 februar 2017

2016 var det varmeste år nogensinde – eller? Fake news?

They say that mathematics is the language of science, which is a way of saying that science is quantitative.

It is moved forward by numbers and measurements, not just by qualitative observations. “It seems hot out” is not science. Giving a specific temperature, measured by a specific process at a specific time, compared to other systematically gathered measurements—that is science.

So when you read an article proclaiming that, for the third year in a row, last year was the hottest year on record, you might expect that right up front you will get numbers, measurements, and a statistical margin of error. You know, science stuff. Numbers. Quantities. Mathematics.

And you would be wrong.

8 februar 2017


Filed under: Greenies, Istid, Klima, Politik — husmanden @ 10:39

Uanset hvad det er så hører vi intet om det.

Vore hjernedøde politikere og presse lader os intet høre om vejret, der jo er klimaet nu og her, i resten af verden. Vi hører intet om is i Venedigs kanaler og bugten uden om.  Intet om is i Sortehavet, store snefald i Spanien, Italien, Israel og Nordafrika. Her er et lille indblik fra adapt.  Forhåbentlig står istiden ikke lige for døren, men skulle vi ikke tænke?

7 februar 2017

Top klimaekspert bliver whistleblower: “Data er forfalskede”

Ezra Levant of TheRebel.media reports on the high level US government scientist who says “global warming” data was tampered with.

26 januar 2017

Metallica Guitarist Kirk Hammett Anti-Trump Meltdown

Lead guitarist for Metallica, Kirk Hammett is having a hard time with the fact that Donald Trump is now the President.

He also equates Trump’s America First” slogan as being something Adolf Hitler would say! Media analyst Mark Dice has the story.

25 januar 2017

Her er svinestien den ‘progressive venstrefløj’ efterlod i Washington

Som de altid gør, når de forsamles.

17 januar 2017

Luftforurening – politikerne taler bl.a. om at afgiftsbelægge brændeovne

Filed under: Bøger, Evidens, Greenies, Klima, Politik, Teknologi, USA/Canada, Videnskab — Hodja @ 21:02

Scare Pollution: Why and How to Fix the EPA

scareWhat is Scare Pollution about?

Scare Pollution reveals the shockingly fraudulent science behind EPA’s flagship regulatory program which has been used to destroy the coal industry, justify global warming rules, and assert EPA’s control over our fossil fuel-dependent economy.

Author Steve Milloy’s expose tells the story of how he uncovered the fraud via his investigative journalism, original scientific research and revealing interactions with EPA, Congress, federal courts and green activists.

What is Scare Pollution’s main theme? EPA’s economy-destroying rules depend on the false claim that particulate matter (i.e. soot from smokestacks and tailpipes) is so toxic it kills 570,000 Americans per year. EPA claims even brief exposures to typical outdoor levels in the U.S. can kill almost instantly.

Milloy thoroughly debunks this claim in multiple and creative ways – thereby clearly revealing the outrageous and costly fraud EPA has perpetrated on Americans.

What’s timely about Scare Pollution? President-elect Trump promised to rein in the out-of-control EPA. Scare Pollution shows just how out-of-control EPA is and offers a road map for reforming the agency.

What are some of Scare Pollution’s highlights? Milloy Uncovers EPA’s Illegal Human Experiments – After EPA falsely claimed before Congress that inhaling even tiny amounts of soot was deadly, the agency sought to justify those outrageous claims with illegal experiments on elderly and sick subjects making them inhale diesel exhaust in an “exposure chamber.” EPA even experimented on 10-year old children with diesel exhaust.

The Exposure of EPA’s Secret Science – To avoid scrutiny of its false claims, EPA hid scientific data for more than 20 years – despite numerous demands from Congress including by subpoena and bills passed. Scare Pollution shows how Milloy discovered a treasure trove of data and led a team of scientific researchers to debunk EPA’s claims with new data.

Finally, a Much-Awaited Explanation of the Likely Cause of Historical Episodes of ‘Killer’ Air Pollution. – EPA often cites fatal historical air pollution incidents to needlessly alarm the public about current air quality. Milloy finally debunks these claims with convincing analysis pointing to the likely actual culprit(s). Who endorses Scare Pollution?

“As a leader in the fight to protect our environment and public health for nearly three decades, I am keenly aware of the scientific shortcomings of EPA’s agenda-driven air regulations that impose significant costs on our economy while yielding no meaningful benefits. Scare Pollution provides great insight into these problems and contributes to a timely discussion for how to reform the EPA.”

Sen. James M. Inhofe (R-Okla.), Chairman, Committee on Environment and Public Works

“Twenty years ago, I chaired the committee of independent science advisors reviewing EPA’s determination that fine particulate matter causes mortality at concentrations commonly experienced in outdoor air in the US. Most of the advisors doubted the EPA’s finding for a number of reasons including the lack of a plausible biological mechanism, but the agency set stringent standards anyway. Scare Pollution confirms the committee’s original doubts in unique and compelling ways, and indicates that EPA’s human exposure scientists do not believe the Agency’s determination either. It’s a must read for those interested in how science is used at the EPA.”

Dr. George T. Wolff, former Chairman of the EPA Clean Air Scientific Advisory Committee.”

Bogen kan købes på Amazon

16 januar 2017

Bjørn Lomborg forklarer, hvorfor Paris klimaaftalen ikke er noget værd

Filed under: Greenies, Klima, TrumfEs — Tags: , — trumfes @ 12:24

En masse fine mål, som koster det hvide ud af øjnene og – måske – påvirker 0.02 grad

Som sædvanlig en god video af Prager University


10 januar 2017

Tysklands Grünen bruger marxisme til at stoppe rationel analyse af indvandringen

7 januar 2017

Bindegale Californien

Victor Davis Hanson skriver om Californien:

Coastal elites set rules for others, exempt themselves, and tolerate rampant lawlessness from illegal aliens.

One reason for the emergence of outsider Donald Trump is the old outrage that elites seldom experience the consequences of their own ideologically driven agendas.

Læs det her.

6 januar 2017

Grüne og Venstrefløjen om NAFRI’s (NordAfrikanische Intensivtäter): Den der forhindrer voldtægter er racist

29 december 2016

Her har vi et rigtigt godmenneske Katrin Göring Eckardt (die Grünen/Bündnis90)

21 december 2016

Renate Kunast (Grünen): Terroranslag har intet med flygtninge at gøre

16 december 2016

To tekst-TV indslag (næsten) uden ord …

Men med et snert af skadefryd 🙂

Først denne fra svensk teksttv
Trump har aldrig sagt noget om at slette data, men klima”forskere” kan jo altid bruge lejligheden til endnu en gang ynk og klynk:


Og så denne fra Norsk teksttv:


Payback is a bitch … 🙂

15 december 2016

Jill Stein i suppedasen igen: Valgsvindel i Detroit – flere afgivne stemmer end vælgere

14 december 2016

Jill Stein på tynd is: Dommer afviser omtælling af stemmer i Pennsylvania

Older Posts »