Hodjanernes Blog

28 april 2017

Berkeley 1969

27 april 2017

Ann Coulter aflyser tale på UC-Berkeley pga trusler om vold fra Venstrefascitisk Sturmabteilung (S.A. 2.0)

Universitetet og politiet vil ikke garantere for hendes sikkerhed.

Ann Coulter informed The New York Times that she would pull out of speaking at the University of California, Berkeley because threats of violence have been made and she wasn’t confident that local law enforcement could guarantee her safety.

Coulter told the Times, “It’s a sad day for free speech … Everyone who should believe in free speech fought against it or ran away.”

Young America’s Foundation udtaler:

When Young America’s Foundation confirmed Ann Coulter would speak at UC-Berkeley as part of YAF’s nationwide campus lecture program on April 27, we assumed UC Berkeley would take all steps necessary to ensure the safety of students attending the educational event.

In the meantime we discovered that the University of California Police Department at Berkeley has an official “stand-down” policy for any situation that develops on campus as long as the situation doesn’t involve the imminent loss of life, allowing the leftist thugs who have terrorized Berkeley’s campus to do so without consequence.

In order to ensure safety of those involved and for the lecture to go forward, Young America’s Foundation requested that Berkeley adhere to the following equal access terms for the event:

  • Central location on the main campus
  • Room holding hundreds of participants
  • Afternoon/early evening timing
  • Ability to publicize event
  • University to announce that there will be zero tolerance at the event itself for masked agitators, disruption of the event; and sufficient security to ensure the safety of attendees; space for protest to be cordoned a reasonable and constitutionally permissible distance from event
  • University to confirm that it has communicated the event details to Berkeley City Police, and are coordinating security with them to ensure that any rioters/violent protestors/masked disruptors are appropriately contained and dealt with

As of 4:00 p.m. today, UC-Berkeley failed to meet our demands, after refusing to provide a proper venue for six weeks. Berkeley made it impossible to hold a lecture due to the lack of assurances for protections from foreseeable violence from unrestrained leftist agitators.

Berkeley should be ashamed for creating this hostile atmosphere.

YAF is pressing forward with its lawsuit against UC-Berkeley, and looks forward to the day when First Amendment freedoms are enjoyed by conservative students.

Ms. Coulter may still choose to speak in some form on campus, but Young America’s Foundation will not jeopardize the safety of its staff or students.

On Tuesday, speaking of Coulter’s scheduled event taking place in Sproul Plaza, UC Berkeley Chancellor Nicholas Dirks had admitted, “If somebody brings weapons, there’s no way to block off the site, or to screen them. In an open space, you have almost no control over that. The challenges are immense.”

College President Considers Punishing Conservative Students For Posting Shapiro’s Quote About Transgenderism

26 april 2017

Australien: Skoler radikaliserer unge

Hvad fortæller MSM ikke om Victor Orbans kontrovers med EU om universitetet han vil lukke?

EUSSR vil føre Ungarn for EU-Domstolen, fordi Orban vil lukke CEU Universitetet, der er oprettet af og finansieret af George Soros.

Medierne ‘glemmer’ at fortælle, at CEU blev smidt ud af Tjekkiet for nogle år siden, hvilket fremgår af et interview med Vaclav Klaus:

This interview was published in the Hungarian newspaper Magyar Hírlap the 22nd of July, 2016.
The interview was made by István Lovas and published originally in Hungarian.

  • The EU is a threat to Europe
  • Brexit is the victory of every European freethinkers
  • Today’s liberals can be considered mostly as camouflaged communists

Václav Klaus is a graduated economist, he was the President for ten years and the Prime Minister for five years of Czech Republic. He was deprived of his membership of Academy of Sciences in 1968 after Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia. He was one of the founders of Civic Forum during the 1989 “Velvet Revolution”, he was also the first non-communist Finance Minister of the country. He founded Czech Civic Democratic Party (ODS) and led it as its president. He is the leader of the eponymous think tank called Institute Václav Klaus in Prague, where we were talking with him because of the German release of his highly acclaimed book Migration [Völkerwanderung – Kurze Erläuterung der aktuellen Migrationskrise; co-author Jiří Weigl – translator’s notice], about the crisis afflicting the continent.

István Lovas: Recently, in an interview you mentioned how you bundled off Central European University (CEU) of George Soros from Prague. I might add, that the Hungarian government of that time was very pleased for being able to host them in Budapest. Perhaps there is a better view of the world affairs from Hradjin than from the banks of the Danube?

Václav Klaus: Very good comment, but unfortunately, one thing is wrong with that. At that time I wasn’t yet the President, but the Prime Minister, so I was looked at the world from the bank of Vltava. At the Hradčany, it was the residence of Václav Havel, who adored Soros. Havel really did not welcome my decision. As far as you know in our countries the direction and the quality of politics is fluctuating. At that time we were much more rightists and radicals, than the Hungarian government.

IL: In a recent interview, referring to the disposal of Soros’s CEU you mentioned, that you were working always on the restriction of presence of him. Can we say, that apart of some minor entities, your country is free from Soros?

Václav Klaus: We are not. There are many non-governmental organizations, which are very similar regarding of their mentality. But if I am not wrong, there is no direct activity in the Czech Republic. At the time you mentioned, we were taking care for not to grant a real status for his University.

IL: In the same interview you also told, that your mind was not changed about Soros during the past quarter-century. You added wholeheartedly also, that he is the embodiment of evil.

Václav Klaus: We wanted to make the transition happen according to our intentions. To realize our ideas during the process of the transformation of a communist society. While Mr. Soros wanted to tell us how to do that. Which was unacceptable for us. We wanted to establish a normal system of political parties. He wanted to fulfill changes that are beneficial for him without political parties, trough non-governmental organizations, which are representing nobody. Least of the voters. So this was the political debate with him.

IL: In your opinion, why the European Union pays so much attention to this speculator? For example in case of migrants.

Václav Klaus: I couldn’t say that it pays attention to him. Of course, there are sitting different kind of homo sapiens there whom I called earlier homo bruxellarum. They are thinking on similar way. I couldn’t state that in Brussels they are looking at Mr. Soros as a big friend.

IL: You praise Hungary on the 36th page of the German language release of your mentioned book, like the only country which took effective measures to arrest the waves of migrants. On the same place, you called the European Commission and the member countries cowards. But what do they fear?

Václav Klaus: I am afraid, they are not afraid of us. They don’t fear Mr. Orbán, anyone, anything. They want to change the composition of the European population. They believe in multiculturalism. Maybe they even believe in their own words, that the mass of incoming migrants will enrich Europe. And that this is the way to the future of Europe.

IL: But you wrote cowards. What do they fear?

Václav Klaus: It is cissy there, in the original Czech text.

IL: That is also good.

Václav Klaus: They are cissy, because they believe in this ideology of multiculturalism.

IL: Brussels said, there will be penalty for each country for every rejected migrants, it will be €250,000 per person. But if the migration is such a good business, then why should punish anyone, who does not want to be a part of it?

Václav Klaus: This is a very good question. Definitely, this is a tool with which they want to force the countries to admit the migrants. But I do not think that they believe that migrants could mean any productive potency to the European societies in the foreseeable future. They understood that their calling for migrants was a mistake, and now, they don’t know how to handle their presence in Germany. This is why they want to distribute them in Europe. They want to punish the Hungarians and the Czechs, who don’t want to accept them.

IL: Why did you prevent, as the President, that the flag of the EU was being flown above the entrance of the presidential palace in 2004, during the accession of Czech Republic?

Václav Klaus: First of all, the EU flag is not an official flag. There was a memorable debate on this in relation with the Lisbon Treaty, if the EU Constitution could contain this, but it was throwing out then. But it is far more important to know, I think, that the Czech Republic is a sovereign state, therefore no EU flag should fly at the top of the Hradjin. We did not like the Nazi flag during the German occupation of our country either.

IL: When on 5th of December in 2008 the EU flag was given to you by Daniel Cohn-Bendit, who commonly represents in both of our countries a special kind of not so lovely people, he did it like it was a reminder to you for your act of preventing the setout of the flag on the building of presidential palace earlier, so he told you, he doesn’t care about your opinion on Lisbon Treaty, and also, that that should be signed. There is no way to protest anywhere! You responded him then, that he is speaking exactly as the soviets did. What is the reason of today’s liberals are talking exactly the same way as the Communists did it during their time? And why it is that today’s decent people hate liberals just as intensively, at least in Hungary, as they did it once with communists?

Václav Klaus: You are talking about today’s liberals. Those, who have little to do with classical liberals. They are disguised communists rather. Mr Cohn-Bendit is not a liberal in the sense of its traditional meaning. He is thinking exactly on the same way as he did it in 1968.

IL: If the current Hungarian government takes any steps, the liberal opposition starts to shout about centralization. In the same time, they adore centralization if it comes from Brussels. Do you also have the same kind of liberals?

Václav Klaus: No, in Czech Republic we don’t call them liberals. I am simply stunned that in Hungary, as you just said, these people are called liberals.

IL: Sorry, they are calling themselves liberals.

Václav Klaus: So in Hungary, but not here. In the Czech Republic they are called Social Democrats. But anyway, we are not using the term: liberal.

IL: I was the witness of your speech a few years ago [19th of February 2009. – translator’s notice] in the European Parliament during the Czech presidency of the European Union, when the delegates run out from the chamber in hordes. While Mr Pöttering, the then President of the European Parliament, was listening that you call them communists as referring to their intolerant behaviour while being criticized, in parallel with the Soviet Dictatorship, his face turned red from anger, and almost choking with rage. Were your views softened since that time?

Václav Klaus: No. They remained the same. Perhaps they had even hardened. I believe that the EU is a threat to Europe and the cause of its continuous, steady decline, nowadays.

Læs resten af interviewet her.

12 april 2017

Berlinsk skole: “Anti-semitisme er helt normalt og OK blandt muslimske skoleelever!”

The case of a British Jewish child forced to leave his Berlin school after being subjected to anti-Semitic violence has provoked outrage and soul-searching in Germany.

The 14-year-old, was beaten, kicked and threatened with a replica gun after he revealed to fellow pupils that he was Jewish.


He endured a campaign of intimidation by Muslim pupils who told him “Muslims hate Jews. All Jews are murderers.”

His British mother, told that the school had done little to stop the bullying.

“They told us this is normal for adolescents from this background, that they’re just trying to find their identity,” she said. “But it shouldn’t be normal. I’ve never experienced such direct anti-Semitism before in all the years I’ve lived in Germany.”…

11 april 2017

Indoktrinering på Vestre Skole i Silkeborg

Politisk indoktrinering starter tidligt i de danske skoler.

Det fremgår af en kort video, som 24NYT er kommet i besiddelse af. (Videoen kan ses sidst i artiklen)

Skolebørn helt ned til seksårsalderen blev torsdag i sidste uge opfordret til at kaste genstande mod billeder af den amerikanske præsident Donald Trump. Denne alternative form for pædagogisk indlæring var en del af et tema-arrangement om verdens lande for elever, forældre og lærere fra Vestre Skole i Silkeborg.

Mere på 24Nyt

8 april 2017

Columbia University indfører apartheid vendt mod hvide heteroseksuelle

5 april 2017

Norge: Ny undersøgelse påviser indoktrineringen på universiteterne

Hvis medlemmer i Forskerforbundet fikk bestemme, ville partiene på venstresiden fått all makt.

MDG ville vært over syv ganger så store som Frp, som ville blitt utradert.

Kan I se det for jer? Røde journalister ringer til røde forskere for at kunne bringe ‘ekspertudtalelser’ man kan manipulere befolkningerne med!

Tallene er garanteret de samme i Danmark – og resten af Vesten. Præcis som i det gamle Sovjet.

4 april 2017

“Se på 9/11 med Al-Qaeda’s øjne”

3 april 2017

Gavin McInnes: Dine lærere lyver for dig

14 marts 2017


Filed under: Politik, Stefan Molyneux, Uddannelse — husmanden @ 14:04

endelig kom det med vintergækker og glimtvis tocifrede temperaturer.

Det er altid godt at have noget at lave, men at gå ude i en mørk, sur, iskold lade vinteren igennem og reparere gammelt maskineri, så det er klar til foråret, er en tvivlsom fornøjelse.  På den anden side er der ikke penge til at lade andre gøre det – man må klare det selv, og så er man nu om dage lykkelig for at være vokset op i en tid med få penge.  Man lærte at klare sig selv – reparere sin  cykel, knallert, radio, robåd og hvad der ellers gik i stykker, og senere, da man var klar til det, kunne man tage en uddannelse, der med garanti skaffede arbejde ude i industrien.  En tid med færre penge end nu, men med en uendelighed af muligheder for at tjene nogle.

Siden da er alt blevet anderledes.  I bestræbelserne for at gøre Danmark til en mikroskopisk provins i en socialistisk verden, måtte man lukke det meste af industrien, for at skaffe vælgere til socialismens lyksaligheder. I den proces var det nødvendigt at skaffe noget for de mange mennesker at lave, så man arrangerede et såkaldt uddannelsesforløb, hvor alle kunne få en universitetsuddannelse og blive forskere.

Det gav selvfølgelig den ulempe, at man var nødt til at sænke kravene så lavt, at flertallet af uddannelserne blev ubrugelige – ikke kun pga indholdet, men også pga uddannelsernes art.  Behovet for piger og drenge, der har studeret til museumspædagogmedhjælperassistent er begrænset, og sådan er det med langt det meste.  Det er ubrugeligt, og det kan end ikke bruges til at løsne en hjulbolt på en gammel traktor.

Det faktum, at alt for mange intet kan, andet end at hyle på andres penge, gør Danmark afgørende svag, den dag de fremmede skal vises på porten.  Vi må bede til, at et under indtræffer – noget der forvandler de mange fede spagettirygge til stål.  Indtil da vil jeg trække plovfurer med min gamle trefurede Fiskars, og skulle jeg gå hen og blive sendt afsted i mellemtiden, så fred være med det.

Indtil da kan de der interesserer sig for Danmarks fremtid lytte til den kloge Stefan Molyneux.

8 marts 2017

Evan Sayet: Uvidenhed er en velsignelse -En enhedsteori om venstrefløjens tankegang

Via No-Pasaran

25 februar 2017

USA: Professor i islamiske studier: Slaveri under islam er OK

Georgetown University professor of Islamic Studies Jonathan Brown is under fire following a lecture he gave defending slavery and rape under Islamic law, arguing that slavery is not an absolute “moral evil.”

Brown, the director of the Prince Alwaleed bin Talal Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding at Georgetown’s School of Foreign Service, attempted to distinguish slavery in the Muslim world from slavery in the United States.

“You don’t find the brutality that you see in American slavery in Muslim Empires,” he said. “Generally, it is simply not very common. Slaves in Islamic civilization were mostly investments.”

Brown was also criticized for his response to a question about sexual relations with slaves, during which he asserted that consent is not legally necessary under Islamic law, suggesting that marital rape is not prohibited in Islam.

Mere her   –  mere om slaveri

24 februar 2017

Interview med Steve Milloy forfatter til ‘Scare Pollution’

EPA er USA’s superaktivistiske miljøagentur Environmental Protection Agency.

EPA står bag junk forskning i bl.a. luftforurening, som er medvirkend51lat5pxpfl-_sx322_bo1204203200_e til enorme unødvendige udgifter for den vestlige verden.

Steve Milloy har stillet myndighederne i USA overfor et kæmpe dilemma. EPA går officielt ud og siger (EPA administrator Lisa Jackson som vidnede overfor en underkommitte fra House Energy and Commerce Committee 22. september 2011):

“Particulate matter causes premature death. It doesen’t make you sick. It’s directly causal to dying sooner than you should”

Samtidig har Milloy med ihærdigt arbejde gennem flere år påvist, hvordan EPA har fået gennemført illegale forsøg på mennesker (inklusive børn) med udsættelse for meget store doser luftforurening uden at informere forsøgspersonerne om risikoen for bl.a. at dø.

Så systemet har kun 2 muligheder: ENTEN er luftforurening ikke så farlig, som EPA påstår (hvilket er Milloys egentlige ærinde), og så kan myndighederne ikke regulere ‘luftforurening så rigidt, som de gør, ELLER EPA og adskillige amerikanske universiteter (som modtager i 100-vis af millioner dollar fra EPA til forskning) har overtrådt alle medicinske etiske regler for menneskeforsøg, som er blevet indført efter ‘Lægeprocessen’ ved Nürnbergdomstolen efter 2. Verdenskrig. Hertil kommer de læger som har udført forsøgene og de videnskabelige tidsskrifter, der har udgivet dem.

Der findes ikke andre muligheder.

Der er selvfølgelig ingen i Danmark, der har refereret sagen, som naturligvis også har betydning for dansk miljøforskning og -lovgivning. Man er for eksempel i gang med tiltag, der skal lægge afgifter på alle brændeovne i landet, og måske på længere sigt forbyde dem.

Mere om JunkScience

Congress is reading ‘Scare Pollution’… are you?

21 februar 2017

Britiske universitetsstuderende bekæmper anti-semitisme på den enste måde de kender – inviterer en anti-semit som taler!

16 februar 2017

Alternativet vil indføre hjernevask i Folkeskolen

Det skal være slut med fag som kristendomskundskab, historie, samfundsfag og naturfag på skoleskemaet.

Sådan lyder et nyt forslag fra Alternativet, som i stedet vil erstatte de klassiske fag med fire helt nye fag: ”Klima og bæredygtighed”, ”Medborgerskab”, ”Kunst og kultur” og ”Erkendelse”.

Det er nødvendigt at tænke undervisningen i folkeskolen grundlæggende om, lyder forklaringen fra skoleordfører Carolina Magdalene Maier (Å):

15 februar 2017

“Tucker porno”

14 februar 2017

Hjernevaskede gymnasieelever pjækker med lærernes billigelse for at protestere mod Trump

USA: Professor på Bucknell Universitet truer sine konservative studenter

Hej Hodja

sådan ser den truende “professor” ud:


Hvem har lyst til at være en hvid mand til hans forelæsninger og eksamination …

mvh TrumpEs

Taget herfra

10 februar 2017

Den 16-årige afghanske dreng, som mandag blev angrebet med en brandbombe i Ry, har i årevis selv været provokerende og voldelig

Ifølge en tidligere elevrådsformand har den 16-årige afghanske dreng gentagne gange har været involveret i konflikter på skolen.

Det var alment kendt på skolen, at han var voldelig og truede eleverne. Når man mødte ham på gangen, vidste man aldrig, om man fik et slag i baghovedet eller gik fri denne gang. Jeg har selv fået et par på hovedet af ham, fortæller 18-årige Peter Adamsen til TV 2.
I min tid som elevrådsformand gjorde jeg selv flere gange ledelsen opmærksom på problemet – uden at der skete noget. Eleverne var bange for ham, og jeg har selv oplevet, at han har trukket bukserne af piger og kaldt dem ludere. Det havde været bortvisningsgrund for andre elever.

Viceforstander på Møllekærskolen i Ry, Alma S. Andersen siger:

“Det har været fremme, at vi skulle være blevet advaret. Det kan jeg ikke genkende. Vi har fået en anonym henvendelse, som sviner en afdelingsleder til og som er svær at finde hoved og hale i. Ellers har vi ikke hørt noget.”

Mere på TV2

Emilie går i klasse med brandoffer: Han er provokerende og truende

Ali Akbari er absolut ikke noget mobbeoffer, for det ved alle på 9. årgang, at han ikke er. Han er provokerende og truende. Han søger kontakt ved at gå ind i en og råber af en. Han har kaldt mig ‘luder’, og sagt ”fuck din mor”, når jeg har truffet ham på gangen. Han har truet mange af mine venner og har været efter rigtig mange på årgangen,« siger 15-årige Emilie Aaby til BT.

Older Posts »