“We shall let in true refugees”, Mr Orban told a cheering audience: “Germans, Dutch, French and Italians, terrified politicians and journalists who here in Hungary want to find the Europe they have lost in their homelands.”
Længslen mod katastrofer, hærværk og pludselig død for EU.
Samtidig falder antallet af europæere på grund af de lave fødselsrater. Det får nu udenrigsminister Kristian Jensen (V) til at erklære sig åben for det, han betegner som ”intelligent immigration” til Europa.
Federica Mogherini who succeeded Catherine Ashton supported Arafat in 2002 terror attacks.
From 1 November 2014, Federica Mogherini succeeded Catherine Ashton as Representative of the European Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy. Here she is, posing in 2002, with Yasser Arafat in Ramallah, this picture had long been displayed in here office, and has now been removed from her Blog.
The entire European Union seeks the establishment of a Palestinian state, AFP cited the EU’s new foreign affairs chief Federica Mogherini as saying Saturday.
Å skape et økologisk holdbart samfunn er ikke like vanskelig i et tropisk land som det er i Sverige. Med et globalt perspektiv så er det mer skånsomt for miljøet at jordens befolkning er mer konsentrert i varme land. Dette står i stor kontrast til Centerpartiets partileder Annie Lööf, som under et intervju sist år uttalte at det var ønskelig at Sverige skulle ha over 40 millioner innbyggere, altså at man åpnet dørene for ytterligere 31 millioner innvandrere og flyktninger i tillegg til de 9 millionene som allerede bor der fra før.
Tidligere har professor Aubrey Manning fra tænketanken OPT (Optimum Population Trust) givet udtryk for noget lignende:
Det økologiske fodspor af en person fra Bangladesh øges 16 gange, hvis han eller hun rejser til USA, mens en somalier, der rejser til Storbritanien, øger sit fodspor mere end 13 gange. “Vores behov for immigration er lige så stort som vores behov for hul i hovedet“.
Jean Raspail: ‘The camp of the saints’:
is a 1973 French apocalyptic novel by Jean Raspail about the disastrous effects of Third World mass immigration to France and the West and the destruction of Western civilization in the process. It sparked controversial reactions ranging from prophetic to discriminatory. Almost forty years after publication the book which influenced Ronald Reagan and François Mitterrand returned to the bestseller list in 2011.[1]
Bogen kan downloades gratis her (engelsk).
“A Bobigny, Fanta Sangaré accompagne des familles polygames dans leurs démarches, longues et ardues, de “cohabitation”. Une volte-face culturelle et matérielle.”
Google translate oversætter første afsnit:
With his four wives and 46 children, Adama (1) was a happy man. This fifties, able to recite in order the names of his descendants ruled over his suburban. Between the five rooms of the house, “life is organized as she could,” he says over the phone. First maintenance officer, he stopped working when the family allowances became enough to feed his world (2). In the village in northern Mali where he grew up, talking about his success with admiration. He wants it to continue. So he did not give any particular echo the upheaval that comes from knowing: two of his wives moved a third dream to emulate. They are engaged in a “cohabitation”, the administrative term for the output of polygamy.
Sidste afsnit lyder:
The Family Allowances Fund pays € 441.48 per month for four children under 20 years, over € 158.78 for each additional child. Or € 1,394 for 10 children, € 2,981 for 20 children, € 4,569 for 30 children, € 6,157 for 40 children. Besides any housing assistance.
He mentioned to Ascher and other politicians that a German study carried out on behalf of the Social Democratic Friedrich Ebert Foundation found that more than 38% of the Dutch people believe that Israel is conducting a war of extermination against the Palestinians.
Mere på Bad News From the Netherlands
Grotesk: Amsterdams skattemyndigheder anklagede jødiske Holocaust-overlevere for skatteunddragelse i perioden, hvor de var i KZ eller gemte sig for nazisterne.
via e-mail danskeren@danskeren.dk, på telefon 86132401 eller i boghandelen
Bogens tema:
Befolkningseksplosionen og det voksende kaos i den islamiske verden har siden 1970’erne affødt en masseudvandring til Europa. Levevilkårene hos os virker åbenlyst som en magnet.
Den islamiske kultur er grundlæggende forskellig fra den vesterlandske, som har skabt det leveniveau, indvandrerne prøver at få del i. Ikke desto mindre accepterer de kun i de færreste tilfælde vore værdier. Det store flertal fastholder tværtimod den kultur, som er årsag til sammenbruddet i deres hjemlande, og kræver, at vi skal indrette os efter deres ønsker.
Dette fører til konfrontationer med de europæere, der ikke vil finde sig i at blive økonomisk udbyttet, og som oven i købet må se deres førhen fredelige samfund ødelagt. Hvorfor skal dagligdagen forpestes af en voksende kriminalitet til og med regulære terroranslag? Hvorfor skal der være ”no go”-ghettoer? Hvorfor kan forældrene flere og flere steder ikke forsvare at sætte børnene i en almindelig folkeskole? Hvorfor skal det sociale sikringssystem konstant skæres ned trods rekordhøje skatter?
I stedet for at besvare disse spørgsmål sidder danske og andre vestlige politikere på hænderne. Snakker og snakker, men handler konstant for lidt og for sent. Rakker ned på dem, der protesterer mod indvandringen og dens følger – og gør endog alt muligt for at få de protesterende retsforfulgt. Samtidig med at vore soldater sætter livet ind for at bekæmpe islamismen ude i verden, gør politikerne reelt intet for at stoppe islamiseringen af Danmark.
Tror politikerne da virkelig, at vor tids mest afgørende trussel mod Europas frihed, velfærd og sikkerhed forsvinder, fordi de forbyder os at forholde os til kendsgerningerne?109 sider, 95 kr., ISBN 978-87-90183-07-3, 95 kr.
Bayerns inrikesministerium klassificerar den islamkritiska bloggen ”Politically Incorrect” (PI) och det konservativa partiet ”Die Freiheit – Bürgerrechtspartei für mehr Freiheit und Demokratie” (Friheten – medborgarrättsparti för mer frihet och demokrati) som extremister och de är därmed författningsfientliga.
Mere på Fria Tider
Today, 80 file boxes worth of evidence submitted during the 2008 Holy Land Foundation trial — the largest terror financing trial in U.S. history to date — including “The Project” documents, are being withheld from the American public by the Department of Justice.
On Wednesday, September 26, TheBlaze documentary unit released the first installment of this chilling two-part series outlining how the current administration has stonewalled repeated requests by Congress to release the disturbing documents and for allowing the Muslim Brotherhood greater entree into American government. Further, the documentary reveals just how close American-Islamic operatives from groups such as the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) have been to subverting the U.S. and Israel.
The Holy Land Foundation trial
The lynchpin of documentary is found in the Holy Land Foundation trial, which was brought to bear by the Justice Department first in 2007 and then again in 2008 against the Holy Land Foundation, a “charity” that was later found to have funneled more than $12 million to the terrorist organization, Hamas. During the discovery process for the trial, prosecutors submitted 80 boxes of Islamic material including the The Project document. Strangely, the documents were deemed inadmissible as evidence and since sealed from public view.
During the trial, five Islamists were convicted, including a founding board member of CAIR. The documentary also delves into many of the key players and American-Islamic groups currently operating against U.S. interests and discusses other un-indicted co-conspirators in the Holy Land Foundation trial.
Soviet and Nazi parallels
The first half of the documentary provides background on “The Project” documents and how the Muslim Brotherhood has been successfully waging a “propaganda” campaign in much the same way the former Soviet Union did before and during the Cold War. One such push advocated by the Brotherhood is to purge the U.S. and its government of anything deemed offensive to Islam, including teachers, lecturers and library books.
Among those interviewed for the series was Rep. Michele Bachmann, member of the House Intelligence Committee, who likened the “purging” of people and material critical of Islam as akin to the type of purging that was carried out in Nazi Germany at the behest of Adolf Hitler.
TheBlaze documentary team also drew stark parallels between the current climate surrounding the Muslim Brotherhood’s infiltration of U.S. government and that of the Communist infiltration of U.S. government during the Cold War. The documentary reminds viewers that after the Hitler-Stalin pact — a non-agression pact between the two nations during WWII — was violated, a contingent of Americans began a Communist “outreach” effort, believing it prudent to incorporate Communists into the U.S. government, including the Treasury Department and the pre-cursor to the C.I.A.
To place the Islamic threat in its proper context, the documentary notes how the Communist Manifesto, by all means nothing more than a minuscule pamphlet, became the greatest “life and death threaten to the Western world” until 1990. Likewise, Hitler’s book Mein Kampf (which, ironically means “my struggle,” the same as “jihad”) provided key insight into the führer’s political ideology and goals of world domination long before he put his “Final Solution” into effect.
Juxtaposing World War II and the Cold War with the current war on terror, the documentary also points out how critics of Islam today are being vilified in much the same way as was Republican Sen. Joseph McCarthy, and, ten years earlier, Democratic Senator Martin Dies Jr.. Ironically, both Dies and McCarthy were correct in their assertion that American government had been breached by those who championed a totalitarian ideology anathema to U.S. interests.
Today, those who question the Islamist-influence on U.S. government, or who call terrorism and Islamic extremists by their rightful names, are painted as “bigots” — much like those who questioned one’s Communist affiliation was dubbed a “Red Baiter.” This policy of shaming Islam-critics in the public square is a propagandist tool engineered to stifle honest and open dialogue.
Ironically, one of the panelists noted that were President Ronald Reagan in the Oval Office today, he would have considered Islamism a far more grave threat to the United States and greater Western world than was the Soviet Union.
Kort fortalt blev der sagt, at højrefløjen er rigtige anti-semitter (dvs racister), venstrefløjen er ikke anti-semitter men har anti-semitiske ytringer og grafitti. Muslimerne er politiske (dvs mere acceptable) antisemitter, hvis holdninger næsten helt kan henføres til Israel-Palæstina konflikten. Hvis man skulle tale om andre årsager, så er det krisen fra 2008 og frem.
En talsmand for Islamisk Trossamfund Imran Shah udtalte “Det er forbudt indenfor islam at diskriminere på baggrund af race, køn og religion.”, så islam er ikke årsagen til anti-semitismen i Europa. Han kalder i samme åndedrag Israel en ‘besættelsesmagt. Og de islamiske lande for ‘prægede af stor religionsfrihed’.
Så er den ged barberet på vanlig DDR-vis.
Vi synes den børes spredes så meget som muligt.
Læs talen på det første link – hun stræber efter fælles EU-asyl politik allerede i år (2012).
Uriasposten: Malmström mener, at medlemslandene med den nye aftale har for stor magt over egne grænser.
Qatar says its investment is intended to support small businesses in disadvantaged Muslim neighborhoods. But Qatar, like Saudi Arabia, subscribes to the ultra-conservative Wahhabi sect of Islam, and critics say the emirate’s real objective is to peddle its religious ideology among Muslims in France and other parts of Europe.
Qatari Emir Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa al-Thani, who has long cultivated an image as a pro-Western reformist and modernizer, recently vowed to “spare no effort” to spread the fundamentalist teachings of Wahhabi Islam across “the whole world.”
The promotion of Islamic extremist ideologies — particularly Wahhabism, which not only discourages Muslim integration in the West, but actively encourages jihad against non-Muslims — threatens to further radicalize Muslim immigrants in France, analysts say.
Hodja
husmanden
Jernhesten
nicolaisennels
trumfes
Hodjanernes Blog 