Hør hvad Nonie Darwish har at sige om islam, jihad, Mellemøsten og Vestens naivitet.
Meget klar tale om problemernes årsager, og manglen på løsninger.
Meget klar tale om problemernes årsager, og manglen på løsninger.
Europe’s refugee crisis has unfolded over the last year, but only now seems to have broken through into mainstream media coverage. That coverage sprang from a viral photo of a three-year-old Syrian boy’s corpse washed up on the beaches of Turkey. According to media coverage, the boy’s mother and brother drowned as well, while his father lived.
The photo certainly breaks your heart. But where were all the photos of gassed children from Bashar Assad’s Syria when President Obama drew a red line, and then promptly violated it? Where are all the photos of babies beheaded by ISIS? Why did this photo make the front pages?
The answer: the other photos would have driven more Middle East involvement from the West. The current photo does not. It merely demands that Europe accept more Muslims from the Middle East into its midst, without solving any of the underlying problems driving the refugee crisis in the first place. It pushes the notion that the West somehow owes membership to people who may very well reject the most basic tenets of the West.
Who Are These Refugees? That competition to accept refugees would be fine if we knew that the refugees plan on assimilating into Western notions of civilized society, and if we knew that they were indeed victims of radical Muslim atrocities. Unfortunately, we know neither.
It is deeply suspicious that major Muslim countries that do not border Syria refuse to take in large numbers of refugees, except for Algeria and Egypt.
Turkey has taken in nearly two million refugees, according to the United Nations, and keeps the vast majority in refugee camps — a typical practice in a region that has kept Arab refugees from the 1948 war of Israeli independence in Arab-run camps for seven decades. Jordan, Lebanon and Iraq have taken in hundreds of thousands of refugees as well, but all border the chaotic, collapsing Syria, and thus have limited choice in the matter.
Iran has taken in no refugees. Neither have Pakistan, Indonesia, or any of the other dozens of member states of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation. Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Kuwait and Bahrain all refused to take any refugees, and explicitly cited the risk of terrorists among the refugees, according to The Guardian (UK).
Mere på Breitbart af Ben Shapiro
Vid mötet med näringslivets toppar gav hon vid flera tillfällen uttryck för sin rädsla att det hon sagt skulle få spridning i den muslimska världen.
Det som varit olyckligt är att det har kopplats ihop med islam, eller det har antytts att det skulle vara uttalanden mot islam. Men det är både felaktigt och väldigt olyckligt. Det är viktigt att tala om att det här inte är några uttalanden som riktas mot en religion, säger Margot Wallström i en intervju till TT efter att mötet avslutats.
It’s a fictitious name the Obama administration invented to deceive us.
Det er blevet efterår, ikke bare herhjemme. Som de fleste nok har bemærket, er det herostratisk omtalte arabiske forår, som fik mainstreammedier og idealistiske politikere til at glimte af håb og humanisme, afløst af blod i sandet og mørke midt på dagen. Analytikere har allerede beskrevet det, og det skal siges igen: Den arabiske civilisation er brudt sammen, det er game-over.
Vi ser, at det hele er noget lort på de kanter. Og vi ser noget andet og endnu værre – for os: At vi ikke evner at forvare os mod opløsningen af den arabiske civilisation. Deres ødelæggelse kan blive vores ødelæggelse. Vi importerer den nemlig.
Her tænker jeg ikke kun på de varme lande som arnested for radikalisme og jihad. Det er næsten for banalt, her er dagens episode. Næ, jeg tænker naturligvis også på den voksende strøm af flygtninge og asylansøgere, der vandrer mod Europa – og for de flestes vedkommende – kommer frem og opnår en eller anden ret til at være her – på de europæiske skatteyderes regning.
Since the early 1990s, the United Nations high commissioner for refugees has selected 200,000 to 250,000 refugees from Islamic countries to be resettled in the United States. Most of them have come from Somalia and Iraq. Syria could soon be added to the mix in the midst of that country’s brutal civil war. The Obama administration has been greasing the skids for the Syrian refugees for months, WND has learned, and the refugees will soon be dumped on American cities throughout the U.S.
Pamela Geller, author of “Stop the Islamization of America: A Practical Guide to the Resistance,” said it should come as no surprise that the U.N. would do everything in its power to flood the United States with as many Muslim refugees as possible.
She said the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, or OIC, which is comprised of 56 Muslim countries and the Palestinian Authority, makes up the largest voting bloc at the U.N. General Assembly.
“They’re very powerful, they’re very dangerous,” Geller said. “You can’t make this stuff up.”
Geller, Corcoran and others such as Islam scholar Bat Ye’or have long warned that there are two methods of creating Islamic supremacy in the world. One is through violent jihad. The other is through al-hijra, or the Islamic doctrine of immigration.
“Basically you have those who want to take over (countries) through immigration saying to the jihadists “you guys need to stop cutting people’s heads off and be patient,’” Corcoran said. Al-hijra will accomplish the same goal over the long term in countries open to immigration, which includes the United States and most of Europe.
En artikel i Newsweek opregner ISIS’ (som artiklen kalder stupide barbariske psykopater uimodtagelige for fornuft) 10 vigtigste fjender – og argumenterer for at Vesten ikke skal gøre andet end at blødgøre ISIS med flyangreb og lade de 9 andre gøre det beskidte arbejde.
Enemy No. 1: The United States (and its allies.)
Enemy No. 2: The Salafis.
Enemy No. 3: The Arab oil sheiks.
Enemy No. 4: All Shiites.
Enemy No. 5: The government of Iran and its military.
Enemy No. 6: The government of Iraq and its military.
Enemy No. 7: The government of Syria and its military.
Enemy No. 8: Hamas.
Enemy No. 9: Hezbollah.
Enemy No. 10: Al-Qaeda.
Det lyder meget fornuftigt 🙂 Lad dem bare udrydde hinanden.
Det er heilt klart at den syriske borgarkrigen kan gå frå å vere ein borgarkrig til ein regional og sekterisk konflikt, sa Kong Abdullah ifølgje nyheitsbyrået Reuters.
I deler av Midtausten er det særskild spent stemning mellom sunni- og sjiamuslimske grupper. I Irak har 2.000 menneske blitt drepne sidan april i år. Mange av bilbombene i landet har vore retta mot bydelar kor ei av dei to muslimske gruppene er i stort fleirtal.
Også i Libanon har det fleire gonger dei siste vekene vore kampar mellom sunni- og sjiamuslimar. Den spente situasjonen mellom dei muslimske gruppene i både Libanon og Irak er påverka av den syriske borgarkrigen.
Officielt har man i mange år påstået, at der er omkring 200.000 muslimer i Danmark, men man har aldrig nævnt noget om fordelingen mellem sunnier og shiiter?
RABUNI CAMP, Algeria — It is almost half the size of the Great Wall of China, four times the length of the wall in the West Bank, and 16 times longer than the Berlin Wall ever was, but few have heard of the 1,600-mile-long Moroccan military wall that divides the Western Sahara.
On the western side of the wall, Morocco exerts de facto control over what the Saharawis call the “Occupied Territories.” On the eastern side, the Saharawis’ Polisario Front governs and maintains its military forces.
The Saharawis refer to the Moroccan barrier as the “Wall of Shame,” not only because it divides the 160,000 Saharawi refugees in Algeria from their families and friends in the Moroccan held territory, but also because it threatens the lives and livelihoods of the thousands of Saharawi nomads that still wander through the Western Sahara’s deserts.
Hussein Obama tillader tortur og manglende menneskrettigheder – og ingen protesterer.
Col. West speaks with Lt. Col. Dooley’s attorney, Richard Thompson, who argues that his client is being treated unfairly, and in a manner that undermines national security. Tune in to hear the full story.
Han sammenligner Obama’s politik med Jimmy Carters.
Jeg var slet ikke klar over at Obama havde en politik i Mellemøsten 🙂
Her er et nyere indlæg fra Sun News om det samme:
The United States alone now has enough gas to last 100 years.
Major new strikes in East Africa and the potential for hefty production increases in China, now a key energy importer, have taken the shine off Iraq’s potential.
“The geopolitical centrality of the Middle East will wane,” the Financial Times observed.
“That is because the power and the relevance of its oil producers have peaked and are heading down,” wrote Roger Altman, former U.S. deputy secretary of the Treasury.
The term “Islamophobia” serves a number of functions: it denies the reality of an Islamic offensive in Europe all the better to justify it; it attacks secularism by equating it with fundamentalism. Above all, however, it wants to silence all those Muslims who question the Koran, who demand equality of the sexes, who claim the right to renounce religion, and who want to practice their faith freely and without submitting to the dictates of the bearded and doctrinaire. It follows that young girls are stigmatised for not wearing the veil, as are French, German or English citizens of Maghribi, Turkish, African or Algerian origin who demand the right to religious indifference, the right not to believe in God, the right not to fast during Ramadan. Fingers are pointed at these renegades, they are delivered up to the wrath of their religions communities in order to quash all hope of change among the followers of the Prophet.
On a global scale, we are abetting the construction of a new thought crime, one which is strongly reminiscent of the way the Soviet Union dealt with the “enemies of the people”. And our media and politicians are giving it their blessing. Did not the French president himself, never one to miss a blunder – not compare Islamophobia with Antisemitism? A tragic error. Racism attacks people for what they are: black, Arab, Jewish, white. The critical mind on the other hand undermines revealed truths and subjects the scriptures to exegesis and transformation. To confuse the two is to shift religious questions from an intellectual to a judicial level. Every objection, every joke becomes a crime.
The Council’s acceptance of the Goldstone Report condemning Israel for self-defence adopts the Islamic view in which jihadist attacks are commended but the resistance of those aggressed upon is taken to be aggression against Allah’s rights. Having lost its legitimacy according to the permanently valid concept of dar al-Harb, Israel is thus alleged to be guilty of the “war crime” of defending itself against its own destruction. In effect, this view condemns any resistance to terrorism and gives a free pass to terrorists. What does this policy tells us about the West, and particularly Europe’s own policy? Does its mean that the West approves the jihadist strategy of world Islamization while self-defence is prohibited? Has the West already adopted this policy for itself as the politically correct culture, as the sanctions against ‘Islamophobia’ seem to suggest? In this case, we have to reflect on the spiritual and political meaning for us of the current anti-Israel hatred and policy in the West, and Rubenstein’s book is an indispensable start.