Det tilsvarende foregår nu i Sydstaterne.
Dismantling of Civil War Monuments Across the South Erases History
Isn’t the toppling of historic artifacts the very thing that ISIS and the Taliban do to the lands they ravage?
Det vil sige en hemmelig rapport, der er blevet lækket af nogen, der ikke er enige med Merkels kapitulation overfor den tyrkiske lommediktator
Det kan ikke overraske nogen , måske med undtagelse af Merkel …
Taget fra Vlad
Han viste sin “respekt” ved at urinere ned i den evige flamme på et russisk mindesmærke over de mange millioner, der blev dræbt under anden verdenskrig.
Uheldigvis for ham var det i Rusland og ikke Danmark, så han kommer til at tilbringe de næste 1.5 år i en russisk arbejdslejr.
Serves him right.
Læs mere om det her
Og her er mere muslimsk respekt: en kirke revet ned i Indonesien:
Muslimer har ikke eneret på disrespekt for andres religion .
Klik her for at se et absurd eksempel på manglende respekt i USA
Au.news: “(uddrag) An Indonesian terrorist, jailed for his role in the Bali bombings that killed 88 Australians, is free and working for another militant group. He refuses to denounce the deadly attack and says Australia still remains the enemy.
Son Hadi has been convicted and jailed for harbouring Bali bombing planner Noordin Top. In April, the US Government officially declared Hadi a terrorist, stating that he also handled the explosives used in the 2004 Australian Embassy bombing. But in Jakarta, he walks the streets a free man, and America says he has links to al Qaeda.
“Osama bin Laden for some or a big part of Muslims he is someone who is a hero,” Hadi says. Hadi refuses to denounce the Bali bombing that killed 202 people, saying it was revenge, for Iraq and Afghanistan. “The attack was actually addressed to the Government, warning the Government that you should not send troops there,” Hadi says.
I artiklen ævles der videre: “»Danskerne har ikke helt indstillet sig på, at mangfoldighed er kommet for at blive, og at man kan leve og være på mange forskellige måder. Når seks ud af ti danskere mener, at folk fra Mellemøsten kan betegnes som religiøse fanatikere, så har vi et problem,«
Snaphanen har skrevet en fint indlæg om hvem der egentlig er intolerant. Jeg har ikke så meget at tilføje ud over det som Harry Vinter fra Den Danske Forening skrev sidste år:
Det har de så ikke, så vidt jeg kan se. Men under søgningen faldt jeg over en PDF med Iraks historie. Dokumentet bærer DDR’s logo, men der er ingen, der har lagt navn til den løgnagtige hvidvaskning af islam, som vor public service organ leverer.
Den unavngivne forfatter skriver, i direkte strid med sandheden følgende:
Hellig krig
Fordi de muslimske krigere kæmpede en “Jihad” – en hellig krig – var de underlagt nogle strenge, religiøse
love. Det betød, at det var strengt forbudt at voldtage, plyndre eller myrde kvinder, børn, religiøse ledere og
andre, som ikke tog direkte del i kamphandlingerne.
De muslimske krigere var kommet for at erobre og besidde, og derfor var det ikke i deres interesse at plyndre
og lægge landet øde, hvor de kom frem. De indtog gradvist hele området og befæstede byerne. En ny
æra var begyndt.
Enhver, der har sat sig bare en lille smule ind i islams historie, ved, hvor meget ovennævnte er i strid med historiske fakta. Og det ved DDR udemærket, og det er årsagen til, at ingen DDR medarbejder vil lægge navn til.
The Council’s acceptance of the Goldstone Report condemning Israel for self-defence adopts the Islamic view in which jihadist attacks are commended but the resistance of those aggressed upon is taken to be aggression against Allah’s rights. Having lost its legitimacy according to the permanently valid concept of dar al-Harb, Israel is thus alleged to be guilty of the “war crime” of defending itself against its own destruction. In effect, this view condemns any resistance to terrorism and gives a free pass to terrorists. What does this policy tells us about the West, and particularly Europe’s own policy? Does its mean that the West approves the jihadist strategy of world Islamization while self-defence is prohibited? Has the West already adopted this policy for itself as the politically correct culture, as the sanctions against ‘Islamophobia’ seem to suggest? In this case, we have to reflect on the spiritual and political meaning for us of the current anti-Israel hatred and policy in the West, and Rubenstein’s book is an indispensable start.
So, author M. A. Khan decided to publish the chapter “Islamic Slavery” from his book “Islamic Jihad: A Legacy of Forced Conversion, Imperialism and Slavery“.
Why can those victims have a place in history, but the suffering to the Kafirs is denied? Why do they have no history? Why can’t the victims of jihad and their history be given a valid seat in the marketplace of ideas?
This denial of the suffering of Kafirs can be seen in how our history books are written. The rise of Islam is glorious, but the suffering of the Christians in Turkey, North Africa, the Middle East, the suffering of the Hindus in Pakistan, the suffering of the Buddhists in Afghanistan are all denied. The victims do not exist in our history. If you die at the hands of Islam, you are invisible to history.
Notice that those who have no compassion for the Kafirs in the story of Mohammed’s martial triumph of Islam don’t care about Islam’s victims today. Islam and its apologists don’t give a damn about the suffering today of Christians in Africa, Pakistan, Iraq, Egypt, the Sudan and on and on. Jewish apologists for Islam do not see the 1400 year old annihilation of the Jews in Arabia being connected to the jihad to annihilate Israel today.
There is another thing about the apologists for Islam. They never refer to Islam’s doctrines of jihad, ethical dualism, subjugation of women and the rest of the Sharia. Instead, they constantly refer to the opinions of Muslim “experts”. But, those who support the victims of Islam talk about the foundational experts–Allah and Mohammed. Once you know Allah (the Koran) and Mohammed (the Sira and the Hadith) you do not need opinions of experts. Why? If the expert agrees with Allah and Mohammed, the expert is right, but redundant. If the expert disagrees with Allah and Mohammed, then the expert is wrong. So who needs the experts’ opinions if you know the facts of Allah and Mohammed?
Why is it when the foundations and the journalism schools meet to talk about how to report about Islam, the victims of Islam have no voice? Why is justice served by denying the deaths of 270 million Kafirs in the Tears of Jihad? Why is it that those who recognize the suffering of the victims of Islam today and 1400 years ago are called bigots and contemptible? Why is it that those who asks for the victims’ story be told along side of the apologists and Muslims are said to be Islamophobic and Muslim-bashers? Why is it that those who know the doctrine of Allah and Mohammed are told they are ignorant and despicable?
There are three views of Islam. The victims’ view is as valid as the oppressor’s view or the apologist’s view. The truth of victims of Islam’s suffering must be told and heard. It is too bad that the foundations do not have the will to finance the complete truth about Islam, instead of the soothing lies told by the Muslim “experts” and their sycophant apologists.
A system that is not simply medieval, but pre-medieval, that seems positively Bronze Age. But that is only because the Arab Muslim nations are not actually civilizations in the modern sense, they are post-colonized tribal clumpings with bits and pieces of borrowed governmental structures and technology that never quite work right. And underneath them is something far darker and more primitive, a miserably brutal and ruthless Levantine existence defined not by moral laws, but by tribal ones. And underneath them all are the pigs. Kill the pigs, and the system collapses.
Video: Snaphanen
“Some of these churches and monasteries have been destroyed, others have been transformed into mosques, night clubs, army camps even stables. Our holy icons and other religious items have been sold to Europe and America”, the Archbishop of Cyprus Chrysostomos II noted.
He said that the Church of Cyprus has been long demanding a permit from the illegal Turkish Cypriot regime in order to repair these churches and monasteries, however there has been no response so far.
Ikke mindre end 16 områder i Danmark rubriceres som værende omfattet af “EKSTREMISME OG SHARIA VOLDSOM GRAD”
9 områder beskrives som mindre omfattede med ordene “EKSTREMISME OG SHARIA”
På 3 helsider beskriver Ekstrabladets journalister hvordan ekstremisme og sharia langsomt, men sikkert forgifter Danmark indefra. Mohammed Rafiq, der har kortlagt ekstremismen og shariaudbredelsen i Danmark er rystet. Han bakkes op af professor Mehdi Mozzafari, som leder Center for Forskning i islamisme og radikalisering ved Århus universitet.
“Sharialovgivningen eksisterer i større eller mindre omfatning i alle danske ghettoer”, siger professoren og bakkes op af Mohammed Rafiq. “8000 ekstremister holder mindst 30.000 muslimer i et jerngreb og forhindrer dem i at deltage i samfundet, i at stemme og så videre”, siger han og tilføjer: “Det Danmark vi kender i dag, kan være smadret om bare 10-15 år!”
Læs endnu flere uhyggeligere overskrifter i Ekstrabladets papirudgave (Eller E-avisen http://ekstrabladet.dk/ebladet/).
Hodja
husmanden
Jernhesten
nicolaisennels
trumfes
Hodjanernes Blog 