»Uanset hvad er det svært bekymrende, at alle, der forholder sig kritisk til den store indvandring, kan ende i EUs sorte register.«
EU opskalerer informationskrigen mod kritikere af unionen og masseindvandringen, og det bør vække bekymring. At vores udenrigsminister blåstempler EU-sortlistning af debatindlæg gør ikke sagen mindre foruroligende.
- Debatindlægget er underskrevet af: Marie Krarup (MF for DF), Søren Espersen (MF for DF), Martin Henriksen (MF for DF), Jaleh Tavakoli (debattør), Nicolai Foss (professor), Suzanne Bjerrehuus (cand.jur.), Jesper Holm Frederiksen (befalingsmand i Hæren, konservativ debattør), Marie Høgh (debattør), Rune Selsing (debattør), Mikael Jalving (forfatter, debattør), Kasper Støvring (forfatter, debattør), Morten Uhrskov (historiker, formand for Dansk Samling), Mikkel Bjørn Sørensen (formand Nye Borgerliges Ungdom), Aia Fog, Jesper Bacher (sognepræst), Torben Bramming (sognepræst, forfatter), Jeppe Juhl (journalist), Katrine Winkel Holm (formand Trykkefrihedsselskabet), Johan Chr. Nord (valgmenighedspræst, cand.mag), Karen West (partiløs debattør), Bent Jensen (forfatter), Sten Vedstesen (sognepræst), Mikkel Scheel (civiløkonom), Daniel Fabricius (civiløkonom), Søren Hviid Pedersen (debattør), Claus Thomas Nielsen (sognepræst), Kuzma Pavlov (formand, KU København), Eva Selsing (debattør).
Udenrigsministerens blåstempling af at sætte debattør Iben Thranholm på en EU-liste er dybt ildevarslende.
Det burde være løgn, men er det ikke. Det er uden overdrivelse den mest rystende udtalelse af en dansk minister siden besættelsen 1940-45. Udenrigsminister Anders Samuelsen, leder af Liberal Alliance, blev i Folketinget af DF’s Marie Krarup spurgt om følgende:
”Er det rimeligt, at en kendt dansk islamkritiker er opført på EU-taskforcen East Stratcoms liste over russisk information, fordi vedkommende skriver, at Europa svigter sine værdier ved at tillade muslimers indvandring til Europa?”
Læs ministerens svar her.
After the islamic terrorist attack in Berlin the city governement released a paper adressing security issues.
In the 250 pages they manag not to mention “islamic terrorism”.
Instead they see “right wing extremism” as the main threat and want to punish all right wing crimes (aka thought crimes) severly.
Of course, in reality, what’s happening is that liberals believe social media contributed to Hillary’s loss in 2016; so there’s a big push to shut down conservative voices on Twitter and Facebook. The excuse they’re using to do that is “fake news.”
Yet, for every piece of “false news” there are probably five pieces of news put out by left-wing sources that either don’t feel compelled to tell the truth about conservatives, have become largely indistinguishable from Democratic Party press releases or that have fallen so in love with a narrative that they don’t care whether a story is true or not as long as it fits.
Læs de 7 værste eksempler her
Og MSM bruger selvfølgelig associationstricket og taler om ‘falske nyheder’ med det samme.
Washington Post Names Drudge, Zero Hedge, & Ron Paul As Anti-Clinton “Sophisticated Russian Propaganda Tools”
The desperate flailing of a mainstream-media struggling through the five stages of grief continues as no lesser unbiased foundation of the fourth estate than The Washington Post pushes ahead with its “fake news, blame the Russians” narrative for why their candidate failed so miserably.
Citing “two teams of independent researchers” (who surely have a substantial libel litigation provision) who found “Russia’s increasingly sophisticated propaganda machinery… echoed and amplified right-wing sites across the Internet as they portrayed Clinton as a criminal,” the Jeff Bezos-owned website names Drudge, Zero Hedge, and The Ron Paul Institute and countless other outlets among the “useful idiots” that true American patriots should be wary of.
Mere på Zero Hedge
Faith Goldy of TheRebel.media talks to Rebel Commander Ezra Levant about crowdfunded, advocacy journalism.
Indstil øjeblikkelig al yderligere tankevirksomhed!
Merkel With Obama: Internet ‘Disruptive’ Force that Has to Be ‘Contained, Managed, and Steered’ by Government
Calling the surge of interest in right-wing politics a “wave” that “engulfs us,” Ms. Merkel noted the sentiment “seems to come from the United States,”
“Look at the European parliament. There are a lot of people who are looking for simplistic solutions and are preaching simplistic solutions which are very unfriendly policies. We have them here in Europe, too, we have them in Germany too.”
Apparently blaming this rising populism — politics that are popular with voters — on the internet, the German chancellor implied the internet would have to be subject to restrictive censorship laws.
Ms. Merkel’s comments on web censorship may be welcomed by many in the traditional mainstream media, whose grip on news narratives has been weakened by digital news services like Breitbart.
This week Germany’s Zeit newspaper published a piece calling for controls to prevent “a German Donald Trump”, while Britain’s Independent former newspaper website published a list of “fake” news sites which they claimed may have “swayed votes towards Donald Trump”. One of those listed was Breitbart News.
Læs det hele på Breitbart
Dear MSM: You’re the fucking experts at fake news, so how dare you accuse us of being fake news?
MSM og politikere er i panik, fordi de pludselig er ved at indse, at de har mistet meningsmonopolet.
Dutch Freedom Party Leader Geert Wilders should pay a 5,000-euro ($5,400) fine for inciting hate and discrimination, public prosecutor Wouter Bos said Thursday.
During a speech in March 2014 in The Hague, Wilders asked a crowd if they wanted “more or fewer Moroccans.” When the crowd responded with chants of “fewer,” Wilders replied that he’d “take care of that.” More than 6,400 complaints about the remarks were filed at the public prosecutor’s office.