25 marts 2017
23 marts 2017
Newspeek stiller dette spørgsmål i denne oplysende quiz
Der stilles 18 spørgsmål – her er det første:
Du vil nok bliver overrasket over nogle af svarene ..
Test dig selv her
Husk at klikke ind på svaret 🙂
(svarene findes også nederst)
4 marts 2017
25 februar 2017
Georgetown University professor of Islamic Studies Jonathan Brown is under fire following a lecture he gave defending slavery and rape under Islamic law, arguing that slavery is not an absolute “moral evil.”
Brown, the director of the Prince Alwaleed bin Talal Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding at Georgetown’s School of Foreign Service, attempted to distinguish slavery in the Muslim world from slavery in the United States.
“You don’t find the brutality that you see in American slavery in Muslim Empires,” he said. “Generally, it is simply not very common. Slaves in Islamic civilization were mostly investments.”
Brown was also criticized for his response to a question about sexual relations with slaves, during which he asserted that consent is not legally necessary under Islamic law, suggesting that marital rape is not prohibited in Islam.
4 februar 2017
Bill Warner og Sandra Solomon forklarer hvorfor en terrorist forsøgte at angribe Louvre med malingbomber – Jahiliyya
17 januar 2017
«Kåte muslimer» holder seg til den islamske staten for å få «full verdi for sine syke, djevelske lyster,» skrev den svenske politikeren fra Sverigedemokratene, Stefan Vestling, på Facebook.
Det får man ikke lov til å mene i vårt naboland. Nå må han betale en bot til den svenske statskassen på 3000 kroner.
Han ble dømt av Svea Lagmannsrett for å ha vist mangel på respekt for gruppen av muslimer.
‘Kåte’ = liderlige.
15 december 2016
15 november 2016
Peter McLoughlin spent years believing the Leftist narrative, namely it was ‘a racist myth’ that organised Muslim groups in Britain and the Netherlands (‘grooming gangs’) were luring white schoolgirls into a life of prostitution.
But in 2009 he first encountered people who said their children had been groomed like this. These informants had non-white people in their immediate and extended family, and were thus unlikely to be racists. So McLoughlin dug deeper and what he found shocked him: there were mounds of evidence that social workers, police officers, Muslim organisations, journalists and even some Members of Parliament must have known about these grooming gangs for decades, and they had turned a blind-eye to these crimes. He also came across references to incidents where any proof had since vanished. McLoughlin spent several years uncovering everything he could and documenting this scandal before the evidence disappeared. He demonstrates that the true nature of this grooming phenomenon was known about more than 20 years ago. While he was writing this book, Parliament was forced by rising anger in Britain to conduct its own low-key investigation. The eventual report concluded the grooming problem was basically in one town: Rotherham. Official reports finally admitted there were more than 1400 victims in this otherwise unremarkable town. McLoughlin argues the authorities will continue their cover-up of this scandal, with many thousands of new victims across the country every year. The criminal indicators in Rotherham are to be found in scores of towns across Britain. McLoughlin’s book is an attempt to get the public to wake up, for them to demand civilised solutions, because if the social contract breaks down, people may turn to vigilante justice as the prostituting of schoolgirls continues unabated. The book documents the hidden abuse of Sikh victims by grooming gangs, and how Sikhs in Britain have already resorted to vigilante justice. The book exposes how political correctness was used to silence potential whistle-blowers, and how this grooming phenomenon demonstrates that multiculturalism does not work. Every layer of authority in the British state comes under detailed examination to expose their part in the scandal. McLoughlin leaves no stone unturned, and at 130,000 words in length, it is likely to be the most detailed critique of this scandal for years to come.
1 november 2016
Eller historien om, hvordan Jyllands-Posten blev til Politiken.
Eller Politiken Vest, som vi kalder JP.
26 oktober 2016
21 oktober 2016
8 oktober 2016
The Hajj (pilgrimage to Mecca) is one of the Five Pillars of Islam.
Every Muslim who is physically and financially able to perform the Hajj must do so at least once in life. The Hajj takes place annually during the last month (Dhu al-Hijjah) of the Islamic lunar calendar.
Many Muslims, however, fail to realize that the pilgrimage to Mecca was once a pagan practice, and that many of the traditions associated with the Hajj have pagan origins. In this video, David Wood explores the Muslim sources to discover the truth about the Hajj.
7 oktober 2016
1 oktober 2016
Child brides as young as 14 are being reunited with their older, migrant husbands in Denmark after authorities decided that upholding Danish law breached their “human rights”.
The legal minimum age for marriage is 18 in the Nordic nation, yet the exemptions are being made for migrants because separating the couples is said to violate the right to family life guaranteed in the European convention on human rights.
Hvad siger Støjsenderen og Limpinden?
25 september 2016
Rice University sociology lecturer Dr. Craig Considine has tweeted:
“Prophet Muhammad protected ethnic and religious minorities with all his might. A far, far cry from Trump’s approach.”
Is Dr. Considine correct that Muhammad treated religious minorities better than Donald Trump? In this video, David Wood examines the evidence.
22 september 2016
Someone sent me a request for another installment of “Leaving Islam.”
In “Volume Two,” we read the short testimonies of ten former Muslims.
17 september 2016
Christianity and Islam are the largest religions in history, and around half the people in the world consider themselves to be either Christians or Muslims.
But Christianity and Islam disagree on fundamental doctrines and practices, so they can’t both be right. Is there a way to judge these two religions? Some people judge religions based on the worst adherents of the religions. Others insist that we should judge religions by their best adherents. However, rather than judging religions by their adherents at all, we should turn to the central figures of the religions. In this video, David Wood compares Muhammad and Jesus.