Hodjanernes Blog

16 januar 2017

Glimrende forslag til Donald Trump !

Indfør narkotest af “journalister” inden hver pressekonference !

Det burde fjerne mindst halvdelen 🙂 og sikkert flere fra CNN

selection_484

man-bites-dog

abe-lincoln

clinton-news

Taget herfra, og herfra, hvor du kan læse mere

6 januar 2017

Stadig absolut INGEN beviser for russisk hacking af valget

Director of National Intelligence James Clapper mener det er bevist

Hodja har allerede bragt et indlæg om kongresshøring om russisk “hacking” af det amerikanske valg her

James Clapper har tidligere løjet direkte for en tidligere kongreshøring i 2013, hvor han påstod at USA ikke “bevist” lagrede oplysinger om amerikanske statsborgere

Vi ved nu fra wikileaks og whistleblower Snowdon at det var rent LØGN

Så hvorfor skulle nogen stole på ham nu ??

Her er en meget kritisk Gingrich, der bl.a. fortæller at efterretnmingstjenesterne lækkede rapporten til MSNBC ( det mest venstresnoede MSM) inden Obama og Trump fik rapporten !

Og Obama besluttede sig for sanktioner mod Rusland INDEN han fik rapporten …
Han havde vel “bestilt”, indholdet i den !

her bliver Gingrich intreviewet af Tucker Carlson om emnet:

Politisk korrekt “journalist” fra NBC tror åbenbart Trump er socialist

Filed under: Inkompetence, Løgnemedier, MSM manipulation, MSNBC, Multi-kulti, TrumfEs — Tags: — trumfes @ 14:06

Hun har vist glemt at dem, der har sendt flest folk i “lejre”, er socialister som hende selv

Hun – og NBC – var jo også HELT sikre på at Trump ikke kunne blive Præsident …

Her har du den arrogante klovn i færd med at spille klog og nedgøre trumps chancer lige inden valget:

Og her er hendes kommentar, da det gik op for hende at det “umulige” var sket og det amerikanske folk havde valgt Trump:

Her er en video, hvor lydsiden er manipuleret lidt 🙂

Taget herfra

Bemærk at de samme “kloge journalister”, der ikke gav Trump en chance,
er nu de samme “kloge journalister”, som stiller “kritiske” spørgsmål til Trump …

Ville det ikke have været klogere at udskifte dem med dem, der ikke tog fejl …

1 januar 2017

En samling af NBCs værste tåbeligheder i 2016

Der er mange, så det her er bare nogle

Bemærk at de ikke er kronologiske

Taget herfra, hvor du kan læse mere

NBC er venstrefløjens flagskib, selvom NBC mister kunder – folk gider ikke mere deres politisk korrekte ævl

Her er en liste over rating på NBCs shows

screenhunter_297-jan-01-12-03

Her er en sammenligning med fox news og CBS ( eg ved ikke, hvorfor ABC ikke er med)

screenhunter_297-jan-01-12-15

CNN, ABC, CBS og NBC kæmper om det samme politisk korrekte segment, som bliver mindre og mindre, efterhånden som flere og flere går over til Fox News

Her er et link til det seneste eksempel på NBC idioti

13 december 2016

MUST SEE: Sean Spicer Smashes Fake News MSNBC Reporter Over Rusian Hack Claims

MSNBC (FSM = Fake Stream Media) HOST CALLED OUT FOR REPORTING ‘FAKE NEWS’

16 november 2016

Alan Dershowitz forsvarer Steve Bannon

Kudos til Dershowitz, som ikke er Trump tilhænger, men en fornuftig person

http://www.breitbart.com står der at man overvejer en at lægge injuriesag an mod en stor MSM TV station

Jeg håber de gør det og at MSM tvinges til at betale en kæmpe erstatning

Magen til ikke alene udokumenteret, men også tydligvis falsk hetz mod en person skal man lede længe efter

Og det er ikke kun MSM i USA
MSM i Danmark kopierer lystigt fra ritSAUs svinerier
Jeg har ikke set et eneste MSM fortælle noget, der taler i mod hetzen

Det eneste positive er at http://www.breitbart.com får mange flere hits, da folk selv vil undersøge sagen, idet de ved at man ikke kan stole på MSM

14 november 2016

Når CNN taber valget, bruger de racistiske udtryk …

CNN = Clinton Network News samarbejdede med DNC og fik spørgsmål til Trump fra dem !

Derfor hulkede de også, da deres kandidat tabte : det var “Whitelash” …

The Rebel Media beretter :

CNN taber seere : under en million hardcore venstreløjsere gider se CNN i prime time !

CNN har nu – forståeligt – mindre ratings end “have nyt” kanalen !

selection_192

Interessant nok har selv MSNBC 25 % flere hardcore venstreløjsere – det må være fordi MSNBC er endnu længere ude til venstre end CNN !

Taget herfra via DKA

13 november 2016

Her er, hvad MSM og “eksperterne” burde have vist og lagt mærke til

Så kan det være, at en Trump valgsejr ikke havde overrasket dem så meget

Jeg har skrevet om det før: tilskuerantal er en langt bedre strømpil end polls, der er baseret på en population på 10%, specielt når der er SÅ stor forskel på tilslutningen

Her er den bedste, jeg har set til at illustrere forskellen i tilskuerantal:

Ovenstående video er fra august 2016 !

Både MSM og trump vidste præcis, hvad der forgik : at MSM prøvede at vise så få Trump-tilhængere som muligt og så mange Hillary-tilhængere, de kunne manipulere med

Men Donald Trump var rigtig god til at skamme MSM ud og det gik rent ind på publikum

190905_image

Taget herfra (kommentar # 24)

11 november 2016

Et sjældent syn: en MSNBC rapporter drager den korrekte konklusion

Morning Joe fra MSNBC erkender at “journalister” har været Hillary Cheerleaders !

Bedre MEGET SENT end aldrig … !

MSNBC var nok den mest ivrige Hillary-supporter blandt MSM – og det siger ikke så lidt !

Hvis nogen skulle være i tvivl om det, så bare se denne her !

Her kan du se, hvordan Joe – helt uhørt – stiller kritiske spørgsmål til sine MSNBC kolleger !

Interessant . Læg mærke til, hvordan gruppeadfæren gør at de andre – pludseligt – er enige !

Men han er en enlig svale

De fleste gentager blot at Trump og Trumptilhængerne er racistiske, nazistiske osv

Bare se denne tåbelige artikel:

selection_184

selection_185

Ih, hvor Hillary Clinton fulgte reglerne …
Er det reglerne om at man IKKE må have sin egen ubeskyttede mail-server, hun tænker på ?
Eller er det reglene om pay for play ifbm Clinton-foundation, hun tænker på ?

Det er – selvfølgelig – helt umuligt at nogen kunne have mistro til Hillary Clintons evner og vilje til at være præsident – det kan KUN være fordi at piger ikke må være præsidenter …

sowell-speaks-the-truth

Venstreorienteret logik for viderekomne …

racist2

Taget herfra, hvor du kan læse feministens artikel

Og vi snakker om forkælede børns reaktioner, så er her – utroligt nok – en CEO = direktør for et madudbringningsfirma GrubHub
som kræver af sine ansatte at hvis de er Trump tilhængere, skal de sige deres stilling op !

Bu Hu – hvis I ikke er enige med mig, er I dumme … 😦

selection_186

(der skal vist stå “disagree” i stedet for “agree”, ellers passer det jo ikke )

Der må vist være muligheder for et KÆMPE sagsanlæg her, hvis der ellers er nogle, der tør !

Taget herfra, hvor du kan læse mere

Det frådende respons på Trumps sejr viser præcis hvorfor han vandt

If you want to know why Trump won, just look at the response to his winning.

The lofty contempt for ‘low information’ Americans. The barely concealed disgust for the rednecks and cretins of ‘flyover’ America who are apparently racist and misogynistic and homophobic. The haughty sneering at the vulgar, moneyed American political system and how it has allowed a wealthy candidate to poison the little people’s mushy, malleable minds. The suggestion that American women, more than 40 per cent of whom are thought to have voted for Trump, suffer from internalised misogyny: that is, they don’t know their own minds, the poor dears. The hysterical, borderline apocalyptic claims that the world is now infernally screwed because ‘our candidate’, the good, pure person, didn’t get in.
This response to Trump’s victory reveals why Trump was victorious. Because those who do politics these days — the political establishment, the media, the academy, the celeb set — are so contemptuous of ordinary people, so hateful of the herd, so convinced that the mass of society cannot be trusted to make political decisions, and now those ordinary people have given their response to such top-down sneering and prejudice.

Oh, the irony of observers denouncing Middle America as a seething hotbed of hatred even as they hatefully libel it a dumb and ugly mob. Having turned America’s ‘left behind’ into the butt of every clever East Coast joke, and the target of every handwringing newspaper article about America’s dark heart and its strange, Bible-toting inhabitants, the political and cultural establishment can’t now be surprised that so many of those people have turned around and said… well, it begins with F and ends with U.

The respectable set’s allergy to Trump is fundamentally an allergy to the idea of democracy itself. To them, Trump’s rise confirms the folly of asking the ignorant, the everyday, the non-subscribers to the New York Times, to decide on important political matters. They’re explicit about this now. In the run-up to election day, big-name commentators wondered out loud if democracy is all it’s cracked up to be. Trump’s ascendancy showed we need better checks and balances on ‘the passions of the mob’, said Andrew Sullivan. We should ‘cool and restrain [these] temporary populist passions’, he said, and refuse to allow ‘feeling, emotion’ to override ‘reasoned deliberation’. The little folks only feel and wail, you see, and it’s down to the grown-ups in the system to think coolly on their behalf.

Elsewhere, a writer for the New York Times asked Americans to consider installing a monarchy, which could rise above the ‘toxic partisanship’ of party politics — that is, above open, swirling, demos-stuffed political debate. In a new book called ‘Against Democracy’ — says it all — Georgetown philosopher Jason Brennan argues for an epistocracy, an ‘aristocracy of the wise’, who might decide political matters for those of us who are ‘low information’ (ie. stupid). This echoes the anti-democratic turn of liberals in the 2000s, when it was argued that daft, Bush-backing Americans increasingly made decisions, ‘not with their linear, logical left brain, but with their lizard, more emotional right brain’, in Arianna Huffington’s words. Such vile contempt for the political, democratic capacities of the ordinary person has been in great evidence following Trump’s win — across Twitter and in apocalypse-tinged instant responses — and it is likely to intensify. Anti-Trump will morph more explicitly into anti-democracy.

If this all sounds familiar, that’s because it’s the same kind of pleb-fearing horror that greeted the Brexit result four months ago. ‘Why elections are bad for democracy’, a headline in the Guardian said. The people are deluded and it is the task of those with ‘reason and expertise’ to ‘un-delude’ them, said a writer for Foreign Policy. ‘What if democracy doesn’t work? What if it never has and never will?’, wondered a pained George Monbiot. Boom. That’s it. The secret and not-so-secret cry of the elites and the experts and the observers over both Brexit and Trump is precisely that: ‘What if democracy doesn’t work?’ It’s not so much Trump they fear as the system that allowed him to get to the White House: that pesky, ridiculous system where we must ask ordinary people — shudder — what they think should happen in the nation.

The anti-Brexit anti-democrats claimed they were merely opposed to using rough, simplistic referendums to decide on huge matters. That kind of democracy is too direct, they said. Yet now they’re raging over the election of Trump via a far more complicated, tempered democratic system. That’s because — and I know this is strong, but I’m sure it’s correct — it is democracy itself that they hate. Not referendums, not Ukip’s blather, not only direct democracy, but democracy as an idea. Against democracy — so many of them are now. It is the engagement of the throng in political life that they fear. It is the people — ordinary, working, non-PhD-holding people — whom they dread and disdain. It is what got Trump to the White House — the right of all adults, even the dumb ones, to decide about politics — that gives them sleepless nights

This nasty, reactionary turn against democracy by so many of the well-educated both explains the victory of Trump, which neatly doubles up as a slap in the face of the establishment, and confirms why democracy is more important today than it has ever been. Because it really would be folly, madness in fact, to let an elite that so little understands ordinary people, and in fact loathes them, to run society unilaterally. Now that would be dangerous, more dangerous than Trump.

Fra The Spectator via No-Pasaran

10 november 2016

Hillarys ‘landslide’ valgsejr

9 november 2016

Nyd amerikanske MSM fra begyndelsen af valgnatten

https://pjmedia.com/video/remember-all-the-media-outlets-predicting-a-hillary-landslide/

Her snakker de om valgskredssejtr – til Hillary ! 🙂

screenhunter_287-nov-09-10-31

Du er nødt til at klikke her for at se videoen

Vi har lov til at være skadefro en dag som dag 🙂

24 oktober 2016

Rigging the Election – Video III: Creamer Confirms Hillary Clinton Was PERSONALLY Involved

Part III of the undercover Project Veritas Action investigation dives further into the back room dealings of Democratic politics.

It exposes prohibited communications between Hillary Clinton’s campaign, the DNC and the non-profit organization Americans United for Change. And, it’s all disguised as a duck.

In this video, several Project Veritas Action undercover journalists catch Democracy Partners founder directly implicating Hillary Clinton in FEC violations.

“In the end, it was the candidate, Hillary Clinton, the future president of the United States, who wanted ducks on the ground,” says Creamer in one of several exchanges. “So, by God, we would get ducks on the ground.”

It is made clear that high-level DNC operative Creamer realized that this direct coordination between Democracy Partners and the campaign would be damning when he said: “Don’t repeat that to anybody.”

The first video explained the dark secrets and the hidden connections and organizations the Clinton campaign uses to incite violence at Trump rallies. The second video exposed a diabolical step-by-step voter fraud strategy discussed by top Democratic operatives and showed one key operative admitting that the Democrats have been rigging elections for fifty years. This latest video takes this investigation even further.

clinton_stooge

Stooge:

a person who is forced or paid by someone in authority to do an unpleasant or secret job for them:

 

Clinton News Network og andre MSM dækker Project Veritas

Damage control

Og mere damage control:

Top Clinton Strategist Discusses Project Veritas Action Videos With George Stephanopoulos

George Stephanopoulos and Eric Trump Discuss Project Veritas Action Videos

Al Sharpton Tries To Discredit Project Veritas Action Videos

21 oktober 2016

Paul Watson retter et direkte og velfortjent angreb på MSM

Og han lægger – som sædvanligt – ikke fingrene imellem 🙂

msm-lies

Nu, hvor der kun er godt 2½ uge til valget, begynder MSM at komme med nogle Hillary kritiske indslag, her et om Apple og Google’s “samarbejde” med Hillary :

20 oktober 2016

Til MSM

17 oktober 2016

Newt Gingrich på ABC om mediamishandlingen af Trump

Han argumenterer glimrende, selv om ABC-værten gør, hvad hun kan for at forvirre

Gingrich: sidste fredag brugte MSM 23 minutter ! på videoen med Trump for 12 år siden og MINDRE end 1 minut ! – samlet – for 3 MSM ( CNN, ABC, MSNSC) på nyheder om Hillary Clintons hemmeliger taler, som er lækket via WikiLeaks !

Taler, hvori Hillary fortæller at hun har to synspunkter : et offentligt og et privat !
Hvor hun fortæller at hun er tilhænger af fri indvandring og ingen grænser !

Læg mærke til at media-gimpen overhovedet ikke forholder sig til det kæmpe misforhold, som Gingrich nævner – det, der interesser hende er at en enkelt Trump tilhænger har sagt at han ikke vil acceptere et nederlag og indirekte truer en (forhåbentlig) eventuel præsident Hillary Clinton

wa_po

the-presstitutes

16 oktober 2016

20.000 Trump tilhængere udskammer Løgnepressen

15 oktober 2016

Medie black-out: Tusinder af sorte marcherer mod Hillary

Older Posts »

Skab en gratis hjemmeside eller blog på WordPress.com.