Colin Flaherty i UK – skal møde Tommy Robinson

Mediernes endeløse anti-Trump dækning

Islamofile BBC forsøger at normalisere niqab

Løgnepressens guide til at skelne mellem ægte og falske nyheder

Mere på Curmudgeonly&Skeptical om hvordan MSM og Google vil kontrollere os.

BBC = British Biased Crap leverer en fakenews overskrift

3 arabiske terrorister angriber politifolk 2 steder, og myrder en 23 årig politikvinde

De blever alle tre skudt under terroraktionen

Og hvad er så BBCs “overskrift” ?

Hvor perfid kan et statsfinansieret TV-kanal være …

Jeg går ud fra at hvis BBC idag skulel skrive overskriften fra 11 september 2001 om, så ville der stå:

“19 arabere brutalt myrdet af 2 skyskrabere og Pentagon” …

Den oprindelige artikel fra BBC indeholdt også denne sætning:

“Israeli police have shot dead three Palestinians after a deadly knife attack outside the Old City of Jerusalem, in which a policewoman died.”

Så BBC laver ofre til bødler og bødler til ofre , når det drejer sig om Israel og arabiske terrorister

Hvis jeg var Netanyahu, ville jeg kyle BBCs “journalister” ud af Israel

Kilde: JL

Taget herfra, hvor du kan læse mere

Og – sikke en overraskelse: – Først siger ISIS stolt at de er gerningsmændene,
og så siger HAMAS at det er løgn: Hamas er skyldige :

Tager herfra

Citizen journalisten Mike Cernovich dokumenterer CNN i færd med at lave Fake News

CNN was caught staging news in a video captured by citizen journalist, who posted the footage to his Twitter account @markantro.

Becky Anderson of CNN is seen in London handing props to a “peace group.”

BBC also wanted to use this fake news footage.

CNN mister en af sine store annoncører.

En undersøgelse fra Havard University: hvad vi alle ved

MSM bias mod Donald Trump : bare se denne ene illustration

Så når Trump siger at han ikke får en fair behandling i MSM, har han 100% ret

Kun Fox News kan siges at fordele sol og vind ligeligt !

Taget herfra og her, hvor du kan læse mere

BBC: “Hvis du skriver noget på vores hjemmeside vi ikke kan lide – kontakter vi din arbejdsgiver!”

9. Offensive or inappropriate content on BBC websites

If you post or send offensive, inappropriate or objectionable content
anywhere on or to BBC websites or otherwise engage in any disruptive
behaviour on any BBC service, the BBC may use your personal
information to stop such behaviour.

Where the BBC reasonably believes that you are or may be in breach
of any applicable laws (e.g. because content you have posted may be
defamatory), the BBC may use your personal information to inform
relevant third parties such as your employer, school email/internet
provider or law enforcement agencies about the content and your
behaviour

Mere her

Rapport: BBC var stærkt imod Brexit

A NEW independent report into the BBC’s coverage of the historic week that Article 50 was triggered to leave the EU has concluded that it “was strongly biased against Brexit”.

The analysis by monitoring group News-Watch looked at Radio 4’s flagship morning news programme Today and concluded that there was “overwhelming negativity” about Leaving the EU.

During the six three-hour morning shows from Monday 29 March to Saturday 4 April, Today fielded 124 guests on Article 50 but only eight, 6.5 per cent, were “given the space to make substantive arguments that the future for the UK outside the EU would yield significant benefits”.

Mere her

Hvor må BBC (British BIAS Crap) føle sig til grin i dag …

I forgårs anklagede BBC Trump for at stå bag gas angrebet i Syrien !

I går (nat) angreb Trump den syriske flybase, hvorfra gas angrebet kom

MSM fake-news afsløret igen !

Taget herfra

Nye tal viser at løgnepressen er døende

New figures prove that the viewing audience for mainstream legacy media TV channels is literally dying, underscoring why the establishment is turning to censorship in a bid to strangle its competition.

The figures, reported by the Guardian, show that those aged 55 and over spend more than double the time (25 hours) listening to or watching the BBC than young people aged 16 to 34 (11 hours).
The results are similar when it comes to the average age of news channels in the United States. The average CNN median primetime viewer is aged 59, while the average Fox News viewer in the same slot is aged 68. Both of these numbers fall outside of the advertiser-coveted 24-54 age demographic.
The numbers emphasize how new media is biting huge chunks out of the mainstream media’s audience share thanks to more dynamic, controversial, interesting and on-demand content.

Mere her

Ægte ‘Fake news’

BBC kalder ham ‘muslim fra Kashmir,’ når han bliver nægtet amerikansk visum.

Da han sex-misbruger en mindreårig pige, er han pludselig ‘indisk atlet’.

BBC – Sig sandheden om shariah

Due to on-going government inquiries, the BBC has recently covered sharia councils in the UK.

During debates and discussion on the issue, BBC presenters did not mention the fact that sharia law has been declared, by the European Court of Human Rights, as

“wholly incompatible” with human rights and democratic principles; due overwhelmingly to its treatment of women. Nor has the BBC provided significant details about sharia law, such as that it allows men to use physical force against their wives, mothers have no rights over children, and a woman’s word is worth less than a man’s.

Moreover, secular or Islam-critical voices have not been included in these debates.
As licence-fee payers, we demand that the BBC provide complete coverage of this important matter and to fully inform the public. We also demand that those who believe in a single democratic law for all are given every opportunity to object to sharia councils, for whatever reason, and that our voices be heard. It is not for Muslims alone to determine whether or not the United Kingdom accommodates sharia law, or what form that should take.

Underskriftindsamling her og mere hos Anne Marie Waters

Lyder som en præcis beskrivelse af DanMarx Radio

Venstresnoet BBC journalist interviewer Geert Wilders

Geert Wilders ‘This Is a PatriotSpring’ – 2017

Nyd Sebastian Gorka totalt smadre en arrogant BBC-“journalist”

Det var tydelig at det gjaldt for BBC om at nedgøre Trump, men det fandt Gorka sig ikke i !

Se, hvordan han flere gange tvinger “journalist”en far British Bias Corp til at forsvare sig

Gorka (og Trump) ved at angreb er bedste forsvar , og nu ved BBC “journalisten” det også 🙂

Gorka skal nok ikke regne med at blive interviewet på BBC mere 🙂

Taget herfra

Sebastian Gorka udsat for BBC + tåbelig SJW

Og han imødegår dem på bedste vis

At tænke at BBC = British Bias Corporation stiller spørgsmålstegn ved en chefs ret til at fyre en ansat, der nægter at gøre, som han har bedt hende om …

Jeg tror ikke at Gorka bliver inviteret mere på BBC …

Nigel Farage Owns Andrew Neil On Muslim Mass Migration Ban !

BBC=British BIAS crap og andre MSM skjuler sandheden

I følge dem sagde morderen i Tyrkiet kun noget om Aleppo

Men vi ved fra videoen at morderen også råbte Allahu Achbar = Gud er størst ( Hodja har allerede bragt videoen)

Så det er sikkert at morderen ikke var budist/hinduist/kristen/jøde,men muslim !

Det prøver MSM-fake-news organisationen BBC ( og andre) at skjule

Her er en Fox News video, hvor man ikke skjuler noget …

Utroligt at de MSM-fake-news “journalister” tror at vi kan narres – som om man ikke kan finde sandheden på blogs !

Taget fra Vlad

Easy Meat: Inside Britain’s Grooming Gang Scandal

Peter McLoughlin spent years believing the Leftist narrative, namely it was ‘a racist myth’ that organised Muslim groups in Britain and the Netherlands (‘grooming gangs’) were luring white schoolgirls into a life of prostitution.

But in 2009 he first encountered people who said their children had been groomed like this. These informants had non-white people in their immediate and extended family, and were thus unlikely to be racists. So McLoughlin dug deeper and what he found shocked him: there were mounds of evidence that social workers, police officers, Muslim organisations, journalists and even some Members of Parliament must have known about these grooming gangs for decades, and they had turned a blind-eye to these crimes. He also came across references to incidents where any proof had since vanished. McLoughlin spent several years uncovering everything he could and documenting this scandal before the evidence disappeared. He demonstrates that the true nature of this grooming phenomenon was known about more than 20 years ago. While he was writing this book, Parliament was forced by rising anger in Britain to conduct its own low-key investigation. The eventual report concluded the grooming problem was basically in one town: Rotherham. Official reports finally admitted there were more than 1400 victims in this otherwise unremarkable town. McLoughlin argues the authorities will continue their cover-up of this scandal, with many thousands of new victims across the country every year. The criminal indicators in Rotherham are to be found in scores of towns across Britain. McLoughlin’s book is an attempt to get the public to wake up, for them to demand civilised solutions, because if the social contract breaks down, people may turn to vigilante justice as the prostituting of schoolgirls continues unabated. The book documents the hidden abuse of Sikh victims by grooming gangs, and how Sikhs in Britain have already resorted to vigilante justice. The book exposes how political correctness was used to silence potential whistle-blowers, and how this grooming phenomenon demonstrates that multiculturalism does not work. Every layer of authority in the British state comes under detailed examination to expose their part in the scandal. McLoughlin leaves no stone unturned, and at 130,000 words in length, it is likely to be the most detailed critique of this scandal for years to come.

Fra Amazon