Hodjanernes Blog

20 maj 2017

En undersøgelse fra Havard University: hvad vi alle ved

MSM bias mod Donald Trump : bare se denne ene illustration

Så når Trump siger at han ikke får en fair behandling i MSM, har han 100% ret

Kun Fox News kan siges at fordele sol og vind ligeligt !

Taget herfra og her, hvor du kan læse mere

18 maj 2017

BBC: “Hvis du skriver noget på vores hjemmeside vi ikke kan lide – kontakter vi din arbejdsgiver!”

Filed under: BBC, Løgnepresse, Medier DR m.fl., Politik, UK — Hodja @ 10:04

9. Offensive or inappropriate content on BBC websites

If you post or send offensive, inappropriate or objectionable content
anywhere on or to BBC websites or otherwise engage in any disruptive
behaviour on any BBC service, the BBC may use your personal
information to stop such behaviour.

Where the BBC reasonably believes that you are or may be in breach
of any applicable laws (e.g. because content you have posted may be
defamatory), the BBC may use your personal information to inform
relevant third parties such as your employer, school email/internet
provider or law enforcement agencies about the content and your
behaviour

Mere her

BBC

15 maj 2017

Rapport: BBC var stærkt imod Brexit

A NEW independent report into the BBC’s coverage of the historic week that Article 50 was triggered to leave the EU has concluded that it “was strongly biased against Brexit”.

The analysis by monitoring group News-Watch looked at Radio 4’s flagship morning news programme Today and concluded that there was “overwhelming negativity” about Leaving the EU.

During the six three-hour morning shows from Monday 29 March to Saturday 4 April, Today fielded 124 guests on Article 50 but only eight, 6.5 per cent, were “given the space to make substantive arguments that the future for the UK outside the EU would yield significant benefits”.

Mere her

7 april 2017

Hvor må BBC (British BIAS Crap) føle sig til grin i dag …

I forgårs anklagede BBC Trump for at stå bag gas angrebet i Syrien !

I går (nat) angreb Trump den syriske flybase, hvorfra gas angrebet kom

MSM fake-news afsløret igen !

Taget herfra

31 marts 2017

Nye tal viser at løgnepressen er døende

New figures prove that the viewing audience for mainstream legacy media TV channels is literally dying, underscoring why the establishment is turning to censorship in a bid to strangle its competition.

TILLIDThe figures, reported by the Guardian, show that those aged 55 and over spend more than double the time (25 hours) listening to or watching the BBC than young people aged 16 to 34 (11 hours).
The results are similar when it comes to the average age of news channels in the United States. The average CNN median primetime viewer is aged 59, while the average Fox News viewer in the same slot is aged 68. Both of these numbers fall outside of the advertiser-coveted 24-54 age demographic.
The numbers emphasize how new media is biting huge chunks out of the mainstream media’s audience share thanks to more dynamic, controversial, interesting and on-demand content.

Mere her

7 marts 2017

Ægte ‘Fake news’

BBC kalder ham ‘muslim fra Kashmir,’ når han bliver nægtet amerikansk visum.

Da han sex-misbruger en mindreårig pige, er han pludselig ‘indisk atlet’.

FAKE_NEWS

6 marts 2017

BBC – Sig sandheden om shariah

Due to on-going government inquiries, the BBC has recently covered sharia councils in the UK.

During debates and discussion on the issue, BBC presenters did not mention the fact that sharia law has been declared, by the European Court of Human Rights, as

“wholly incompatible” with human rights and democratic principles; due overwhelmingly to its treatment of women. Nor has the BBC provided significant details about sharia law, such as that it allows men to use physical force against their wives, mothers have no rights over children, and a woman’s word is worth less than a man’s.

Moreover, secular or Islam-critical voices have not been included in these debates.
As licence-fee payers, we demand that the BBC provide complete coverage of this important matter and to fully inform the public. We also demand that those who believe in a single democratic law for all are given every opportunity to object to sharia councils, for whatever reason, and that our voices be heard. It is not for Muslims alone to determine whether or not the United Kingdom accommodates sharia law, or what form that should take.

Underskriftindsamling her og mere hos Anne Marie Waters

5 marts 2017

Lyder som en præcis beskrivelse af DanMarx Radio

bbc

25 februar 2017

Venstresnoet BBC journalist interviewer Geert Wilders

Geert Wilders ‘This Is a PatriotSpring’ – 2017

19 februar 2017

Nyd Sebastian Gorka totalt smadre en arrogant BBC-“journalist”

Det var tydelig at det gjaldt for BBC om at nedgøre Trump, men det fandt Gorka sig ikke i !

Se, hvordan han flere gange tvinger “journalist”en far British Bias Corp til at forsvare sig

Gorka (og Trump) ved at angreb er bedste forsvar , og nu ved BBC “journalisten” det også 🙂

Gorka skal nok ikke regne med at blive interviewet på BBC mere 🙂

bbcbias02

Taget herfra

1 februar 2017

Sebastian Gorka udsat for BBC + tåbelig SJW

Og han imødegår dem på bedste vis

At tænke at BBC = British Bias Corporation stiller spørgsmålstegn ved en chefs ret til at fyre en ansat, der nægter at gøre, som han har bedt hende om …

Jeg tror ikke at Gorka bliver inviteret mere på BBC …

bbcbias02

29 januar 2017

Nigel Farage Owns Andrew Neil On Muslim Mass Migration Ban !

21 december 2016

BBC=British BIAS crap og andre MSM skjuler sandheden

I følge dem sagde morderen i Tyrkiet kun noget om Aleppo

Men vi ved fra videoen at morderen også råbte Allahu Achbar = Gud er størst ( Hodja har allerede bragt videoen)

Så det er sikkert at morderen ikke var budist/hinduist/kristen/jøde,men muslim !

bbcbias02

Det prøver MSM-fake-news organisationen BBC ( og andre) at skjule

Her er en Fox News video, hvor man ikke skjuler noget …

Utroligt at de MSM-fake-news “journalister” tror at vi kan narres – som om man ikke kan finde sandheden på blogs !

Taget fra Vlad

15 november 2016

Easy Meat: Inside Britain’s Grooming Gang Scandal

Peter McLoughlin spent years believing the Leftist narrative, namely it was ‘a racist myth’ that organised Muslim groups in Britain and the Netherlands (‘grooming gangs’) were luring white schoolgirls into a life of prostitution.

easy_meatBut in 2009 he first encountered people who said their children had been groomed like this. These informants had non-white people in their immediate and extended family, and were thus unlikely to be racists. So McLoughlin dug deeper and what he found shocked him: there were mounds of evidence that social workers, police officers, Muslim organisations, journalists and even some Members of Parliament must have known about these grooming gangs for decades, and they had turned a blind-eye to these crimes. He also came across references to incidents where any proof had since vanished. McLoughlin spent several years uncovering everything he could and documenting this scandal before the evidence disappeared. He demonstrates that the true nature of this grooming phenomenon was known about more than 20 years ago. While he was writing this book, Parliament was forced by rising anger in Britain to conduct its own low-key investigation. The eventual report concluded the grooming problem was basically in one town: Rotherham. Official reports finally admitted there were more than 1400 victims in this otherwise unremarkable town. McLoughlin argues the authorities will continue their cover-up of this scandal, with many thousands of new victims across the country every year. The criminal indicators in Rotherham are to be found in scores of towns across Britain. McLoughlin’s book is an attempt to get the public to wake up, for them to demand civilised solutions, because if the social contract breaks down, people may turn to vigilante justice as the prostituting of schoolgirls continues unabated. The book documents the hidden abuse of Sikh victims by grooming gangs, and how Sikhs in Britain have already resorted to vigilante justice. The book exposes how political correctness was used to silence potential whistle-blowers, and how this grooming phenomenon demonstrates that multiculturalism does not work. Every layer of authority in the British state comes under detailed examination to expose their part in the scandal. McLoughlin leaves no stone unturned, and at 130,000 words in length, it is likely to be the most detailed critique of this scandal for years to come.

Fra Amazon

11 november 2016

Det frådende respons på Trumps sejr viser præcis hvorfor han vandt

If you want to know why Trump won, just look at the response to his winning.

The lofty contempt for ‘low information’ Americans. The barely concealed disgust for the rednecks and cretins of ‘flyover’ America who are apparently racist and misogynistic and homophobic. The haughty sneering at the vulgar, moneyed American political system and how it has allowed a wealthy candidate to poison the little people’s mushy, malleable minds. The suggestion that American women, more than 40 per cent of whom are thought to have voted for Trump, suffer from internalised misogyny: that is, they don’t know their own minds, the poor dears. The hysterical, borderline apocalyptic claims that the world is now infernally screwed because ‘our candidate’, the good, pure person, didn’t get in.
This response to Trump’s victory reveals why Trump was victorious. Because those who do politics these days — the political establishment, the media, the academy, the celeb set — are so contemptuous of ordinary people, so hateful of the herd, so convinced that the mass of society cannot be trusted to make political decisions, and now those ordinary people have given their response to such top-down sneering and prejudice.

Oh, the irony of observers denouncing Middle America as a seething hotbed of hatred even as they hatefully libel it a dumb and ugly mob. Having turned America’s ‘left behind’ into the butt of every clever East Coast joke, and the target of every handwringing newspaper article about America’s dark heart and its strange, Bible-toting inhabitants, the political and cultural establishment can’t now be surprised that so many of those people have turned around and said… well, it begins with F and ends with U.

The respectable set’s allergy to Trump is fundamentally an allergy to the idea of democracy itself. To them, Trump’s rise confirms the folly of asking the ignorant, the everyday, the non-subscribers to the New York Times, to decide on important political matters. They’re explicit about this now. In the run-up to election day, big-name commentators wondered out loud if democracy is all it’s cracked up to be. Trump’s ascendancy showed we need better checks and balances on ‘the passions of the mob’, said Andrew Sullivan. We should ‘cool and restrain [these] temporary populist passions’, he said, and refuse to allow ‘feeling, emotion’ to override ‘reasoned deliberation’. The little folks only feel and wail, you see, and it’s down to the grown-ups in the system to think coolly on their behalf.

Elsewhere, a writer for the New York Times asked Americans to consider installing a monarchy, which could rise above the ‘toxic partisanship’ of party politics — that is, above open, swirling, demos-stuffed political debate. In a new book called ‘Against Democracy’ — says it all — Georgetown philosopher Jason Brennan argues for an epistocracy, an ‘aristocracy of the wise’, who might decide political matters for those of us who are ‘low information’ (ie. stupid). This echoes the anti-democratic turn of liberals in the 2000s, when it was argued that daft, Bush-backing Americans increasingly made decisions, ‘not with their linear, logical left brain, but with their lizard, more emotional right brain’, in Arianna Huffington’s words. Such vile contempt for the political, democratic capacities of the ordinary person has been in great evidence following Trump’s win — across Twitter and in apocalypse-tinged instant responses — and it is likely to intensify. Anti-Trump will morph more explicitly into anti-democracy.

If this all sounds familiar, that’s because it’s the same kind of pleb-fearing horror that greeted the Brexit result four months ago. ‘Why elections are bad for democracy’, a headline in the Guardian said. The people are deluded and it is the task of those with ‘reason and expertise’ to ‘un-delude’ them, said a writer for Foreign Policy. ‘What if democracy doesn’t work? What if it never has and never will?’, wondered a pained George Monbiot. Boom. That’s it. The secret and not-so-secret cry of the elites and the experts and the observers over both Brexit and Trump is precisely that: ‘What if democracy doesn’t work?’ It’s not so much Trump they fear as the system that allowed him to get to the White House: that pesky, ridiculous system where we must ask ordinary people — shudder — what they think should happen in the nation.

The anti-Brexit anti-democrats claimed they were merely opposed to using rough, simplistic referendums to decide on huge matters. That kind of democracy is too direct, they said. Yet now they’re raging over the election of Trump via a far more complicated, tempered democratic system. That’s because — and I know this is strong, but I’m sure it’s correct — it is democracy itself that they hate. Not referendums, not Ukip’s blather, not only direct democracy, but democracy as an idea. Against democracy — so many of them are now. It is the engagement of the throng in political life that they fear. It is the people — ordinary, working, non-PhD-holding people — whom they dread and disdain. It is what got Trump to the White House — the right of all adults, even the dumb ones, to decide about politics — that gives them sleepless nights

This nasty, reactionary turn against democracy by so many of the well-educated both explains the victory of Trump, which neatly doubles up as a slap in the face of the establishment, and confirms why democracy is more important today than it has ever been. Because it really would be folly, madness in fact, to let an elite that so little understands ordinary people, and in fact loathes them, to run society unilaterally. Now that would be dangerous, more dangerous than Trump.

Fra The Spectator via No-Pasaran

5 november 2016

BBC-rapporter på selvmordsmission: prøver PC-argumenter mod Milo

Hvor dum har man lov til at være …

Milo finder sig ikke i den slags politisk korrekt BAVL:

Tåbelige BBC spørgsmål a la disse:
er du ikke bange for at “nogen” ikke kan skelne mellem dine jokes og din mening ?

er du ikke bange for at “nogen” kan/vil misforstå dig ?

betragter du dig selv som en “hvid nationalist” ?

BBC = British BIAS Corporation

Taget fra snaphanen

24 oktober 2016

Paul Weston, State of the Nation

Vesten er en supertanker i fuld fart mod et islamo-venstrefløjs isbjerg.

“Whitehall ser britiske soldater som fjenden og islamister som frihedskæmpere!”

20 oktober 2016

Til MSM

15 oktober 2016

Rabbi Sachs tale i europaparlamentet om den nye antisemitisme

Sachs er tidligere chefrabbiner i England – det her er nok hans bedste tale !

Han nævner at den nuværende version af antisemitisme er hadet til den jødiske stat Israel
af udøverne kaldet “antizionisme” – det er helt korrekt

Jeg synes godt at han kunne nævne at udviklingen først og fremmest skyldes den venstreorienterede propaganda mod Israel i alle MSM medier

Vi snakker om 40 års ukritisk anti-israelsk propaganda

Jeg kan ikke se – på nuværende tidspunkt – at udviklingen vil vende

Ikke med mindre den folkelige bølge mod den muslimske masseindvandring og mod MSM’s misbrug af medierne vinder majoritet i Europas lande og i EU

Taget fra Vlad

14 oktober 2016

Hussein Obama til forsvar for løgnepressen

President Barack Obama on Thursday decried America’s “wild, wild west” media environment for allowing conspiracy theorists a broad platform and destroying a common basis for debate.

Recalling past days when three television channels delivered fact-based news that most people trusted, Obama said democracy require citizens to be able to sift through lies and distortions.

“We are going to have to rebuild within this wild-wild-west-of-information flow some sort of curating function that people agree to,” Obama said at an innovation conference in Pittsburgh.

Mere på Breitbart

Det gør mere og mere ondt på politikerne og løgnepressen, at de ikke kan styre informationerne og manipulere befolkningerne.

msnbc

hillary_support

Older Posts »