Vi “ved” fra fake-news MSM at Trump ikke er populær, ikke har lavet noget somhelst etc
Selvfølgelig er det meste at det ævl LØGN
Har du f.eks. hørt i fake-news MSM, udenlandske såvel som de danske
at den amerikanske økonomi (GNP) steg med næsten 4 % i det tredie kvartal af 2017 !! ?
Nej vel … til gengæld ved du “alt” om Trumps påståede valgsamarbejde med Rusland : dvs ingenting ..
Her er en ganske interessant oversigt over, hvad fake-news MSM har valgt IKKE at bringe om Trump og hans regering:
Her er en oversigt over Trump’s succeser:
the current NAFTA negotiations
Kim Jong-un blinking
China threatening a trade war and then blinking
the U.S. becoming a net energy exporter
our diminishing trade imbalance
the amazing rise to nearly 4% GDP growth in the 2017 third quarter
forecasters suggesting that GDP could grow to 5 or 6% annualized
a rise in manufacturing investments in the U.S.
more full-time jobs among the middle class
the Syrian crisis
the continuing fall of ISIS in the Middle East
Wall Street’s record highs as they turn to embrace Main Street
the public’s opposition to the destruction of historic statues and memorials
an abhorrence of radical and violent activists on all sides, most all of whom abide on the left fringe
Russian collusion
the Awan brothers
Debbie Wasserman Schultz
Hillary and the Clinton Foundation entities
the wall
immigration
The letter lists 14 specific inquiries the congressmen would like this potential second special counsel to look into:
Then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch directing Mr. Comey to mislead the American people on the nature of the Clinton investigation;
The shadow cast over our system of justice concerning Secretary Clinton and her involvement in mishandling classified information;
FBI and DOJ’s investigative decisions related to former Secretary Clinton’s email investigation, including the propriety and consequence of immunity deals given to potential Clinton co-conspirators Cheryl Mills, Heather Samuelson, John Bentel and possibly others;
The apparent failure of DOJ to empanel a grand jury to investigate allegations of mishandling of classified information by Hillary Clinton and her associates;
The Department of State and its employees’ involvement in determining which communications of Secretary Clinton’s and her associates to turn over for public scrutiny;
WikiLeaks disclosures concerning the Clinton Foundation and its potentially unlawful international dealings;
Connections between the Clinton campaign, or the Clinton Foundation, and foreign entities, including those from Russia and Ukraine;
Mr. Comey’s knowledge of the purchase of Uranium One by the company Rosatom, whether the approval of the sale was connected to any donations made to the Clinton Foundation, and what role Secretary Clinton played in the approval of that sale that had national security ramifications;
Disclosures arising from unlawful access to the Democratic National Committee’s (DNC) computer systems, including inappropriate collusion between the DNC and the Clinton campaign to undermine Senator Bernie Sanders’ presidential campaign;
Post-election accusations by the President that he was wiretapped by the previous Administration, and whether Mr. Comey and Ms. Lynch had any knowledge of efforts made by any federal agency to unlawfully monitor communications of then-candidate Trump or his associates;
Selected leaks of classified information related to the unmasking of U.S. person identities incidentally collected upon by the intelligence community, including an assessment of whether anyone in the Obama Administration, including Mr. Comey, Ms. Lynch, Ms. Susan Rice, Ms. Samantha Power, or others, had any knowledge about the “unmasking” of individuals on then candidate-Trump’s campaign team, transition team, or both;
Admitted leaks by Mr. Comey to Columbia University law professor, Daniel Richman, regarding conversations between Mr. Comey and President Trump, how the leaked information was purposefully released to lead to the appointment of a special counsel, and whether any classified information was included in the now infamous “Comey memos”;
Mr. Comey’s and the FBI’s apparent reliance on “Fusion GPS” in its investigation of the Trump campaign, including the company’s creation of a “dossier” of information about Mr. Trump, that dossier’s commission and dissemination in the months before and after the 2016 election, whether the FBI paid anyone connected to the dossier, and the intelligence sources of Fusion GPS or any person or company working for Fusion GPS and its affiliates; and
Any and all potential leaks originated by Mr. Comey and provide to author Michael Schmidt dating back to 1993.
Don’t look to the mainstream media to tell you how troubling the situation with the Awan brothers is. It’s worse than you think. After Imran Awan was arrested this week for trying to flee the country, WikiLeaks’ Julian Assange reminded his 279,000 Twitter followers of an email link between Imran Awan and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi.
4. Why Aren’t The Media Reporting This Story? Thus far, only Politico among the mainstream media news outlets has covered the Awan story. Nothing from ABC News. Nothing from NBCNews.com. Nothing from CNN. Nothing from The New York Times. That’s pretty stunning, considering the potential scope of the story. One suspicion: are mainstream outlets concerned that perhaps Awan might be in some way connected to DNC leaks that damaged Democrats, or that will do so in the future?
This is a major story. We’re just beginning to learn the ramifications. It’s certainly bizarre that it’s being buried by mainstream outlets.
Donald Trump Junior’s meeting with a Russian lawyer is now uncovering alleged ties between Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign and Russia.
An email released by Wikileaks shows the campaign worked to cover up its opposition to sanctions against Russia, and its ties to a speech Bill Clinton gave in Moscow for $500,000. One America’s Sani Unutoa has the story.
Bill Still var manden, der bedst forudsagde valgets resultat. Vi må alle håbe, at han er længere fra sandheden denne gang, da det ellers bliver lidt for korrupt derovre – for min smag i hvert fald.
In early June, Sen. Chuck Grassley, chairman of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, launched a new probe of former Secretary of State Clinton’s attempts to deflect a Bangladesh government corruption investigation of Muhammad Yunus, a Clinton Foundation donor and friend of Hillary and Bill Clinton.
“If the Secretary of State used her position to intervene in an independent investigation by a sovereign government simply because of a personal and financial relationship stemming from the Clinton Foundation rather than the legitimate foreign policy interests of the United States, then that would be unacceptable,” Grassley said in a letter to Secretary of State Rex Tillerson.
Sanders and his wife are both under investigation over a bank loan Jane Sanders got to expand Burlington College while she was its president, CBS News reported last week.
The couple has sought legal protection over federal agents’ allegations from a January 2016 complaint accusing then-President of Burlington College, Ms. Sanders, of distorting donor levels in a 2010 loan application for $10 million from People’s United Bank to purchase 33 acres of land for the institution.
And former Attorney General Loretta Lynch is now under investigation, too. The Senate Judiciary Committee last week opened a probe into Lynch’s efforts to control the FBI’s investigation into Clinton’s email scandal.
Former FBI Director James Comey testified this month, that she tried to get the FBI to downplay that probe. “At one point, she directed me not to call it an ‘investigation’ but instead to call it a ‘matter,’ which confused me and concerned me,” Comey said. Comey said Lynch’s request “gave the impression the attorney general was looking to align the way we talked about our investigation with the way a political campaign was describing the same activity.”
From the nonstop coverage of Trump’s alleged collusion with Russia during the 2016 presidential election, you’d think he was under FBI investigation. But he isn’t. Instead, three big Democratic players are.
Havde det ikke været fordi, det er den kloge og besindige Bill Still, der bringer beretningen til torvs, så ville jeg have sagt konspirationsævl, men kombineret med venstrefløjens paniske angst for Trump synes den del at det hele at falde på plads.
The Clintons har ganske enkelt drevet et forbrydersyndikat som ikke lader noget tilbage. Det hele var planlagt – turen ind i det hvide hus – og alle tropperne var på plads. I fbi var den gamle Clinton soldat placeret, klar til at tage sig af alle sager, der kunne blive rejst mod de kriminelle Clintons.
Og så blev Trump valgt. Oh ve oh skræk. Det havde man ikke forestillet sig kunne ske – pressen var jo både købt og betalt, og nu stikker skeletterne op af slammet. Og Trump er langt snedigere og mere snu, end de havde forestillet sig. Stille og roligt tager han verden rundt, og fortæller korrupte magthavere, hvad han mener, og de er paniske Se bare eussr. Og derhjemme tager Demokraterne og Clintons livet af sig selv, medens de graver sig stadig dybere ned i russisk salat.
Som salig Mark Twain sagde, så burde politikere og bleer skiftes ofte – og af samme grund. Overalt ser vi de uoprettelige skader vestlige politikere laver. Helt generelt bør politikere max vælges for fire år, og jobbet bør være ringe lønnet. Staten bør generelt begrænses til at forsvare nationen og sørge for lov og orden. Resten klarer borgerne selv inden for civilisationens grænser.
Selv om Obama sagde at han ville tage det som en personlig fornærmelse ikke at stemme på Hillary !
Se fra 1:48 her:
Men nu er alt det “glemt” …
Obama har givet et interview til magazine “Rolling Stone”
Heri kommmer han bl.a med følgende
“… , I can say without any equivocation that the country is a lot better off: The economy is stronger, the federal government works better, and our standing in the world is higher.”
Jeg går ud fra at Obama har spurgt Castro(Raul), Irans Ayatollaer, FN, Lykketoft og Abbas , siden han synes at lide under den illusion at “our standing in the world is higher” !
Og Obama fortsætter lidt senere:
“.. there is a cohort of working-class white voters that voted for me in sizable numbers, but that we’ve had trouble getting to vote for Democrats in midterm elections. In this election, [they] turned out in huge numbers for Trump.”
Og her er så “årsagen” til at Obamas legacy og Hilary tabte:
“And I think that part of it has to do with our inability, our failure, to reach those voters effectively. Part of it is Fox News in every bar and restaurant in big chunks of the country, but part of it is also Democrats not working at a grassroots level, being in there, showing up, making arguments”
Det er altså først og fremmest Fox News skyld …
Prøv lige at høre Obama tale ( i juli 2016) for at vælge Hillary Clinton og læg også mærke til, hvor dårligt og stammende Obama taler, når han ikke har en teleprompter:
Her påstår han at det er republikanernes skyld det hele : de har i de sidste 8 år nedstemt alt hvad han har kæmpet for ( stakkels lille uskyldige Barrack Hussein …)
Obama håber at ingen kan huske at da han kom til magten i 2008, havde han – ligesom Trump har nu 🙂 – et flertal både i senatet og repræsentanternes hus :
Han kunne mao. have fået gennemført, hvad han ville
Denne løgn slynger han ud med samme overbevisning som Hillary, da hun påstod at hun ikke hvad begået noget ulovligt ifbm hendes private ulovlige server
Og Obama påstår også i videoen at det er Hillary som taler for arbejderen på gulvet …
Det er åbenbart det, alle de mange donationer fra Wall Street og arabiske sheriker til Hillarys ClintonFoundation er gået til …
Det må have undgået de mange arbejdere i “The Rust Belt”s opmærksomhed i Pensylvania, Wisconsin og Michigan.
Måske fordi Obamas politik fik dem fyret
Sammenhold dette ( og hele videon) med hvad Obama nu siger : det er en helt anden historie
Det eneste Obama er sikker på er at det ikke er hans skyld …
Det er det jo … aldrig
Taget herfra, jvor du kan læse hele interviewet med Obama, hvis du ikke allerde har fået nok
Her er et godt eksempel på forskellem mellem Obama og Donald Trump:
Trump reagerede med det samme, da et firma ville flytte til Mexico
Læg mærke til sidste sætning i ovenstående klip : det er forskellen !
“House Oversight Committee Chair” Jason Chaffet siger at Hillary ikke er sluppet endnu
MSM elskede at Donald Trump sagde at han ikke ville “forfølge” Hillary Clinton
Men der mange andre, der synes hun bør stå til ansvar for sine handlinger:
Jeg tror at en af de vigtigste årsager til at Donald Trump blev valgt var hans kompromisløse udtalelser om at alle er lige, og det gælder også for Clinton -dynastiet
I betragtning af at mange sidder i fængsel/ er blevet fyret for langt mindre forbrydelser mod den amerikanske sikkerhed virker det helt forkert at give Hillary et “get out of jail” frikort
Hun må stå til ansvar for sin email-skandale – og så mangler vi også hendes ansvar for Benghazi-krisen og hendes ( og Bill’s) Clinton Foundation : den sidste tror jeg vil være langt den alvorligste !
Morning Joe fra MSNBC erkender at “journalister” har været Hillary Cheerleaders !
Bedre MEGET SENT end aldrig … !
MSNBC var nok den mest ivrige Hillary-supporter blandt MSM – og det siger ikke så lidt !
Hvis nogen skulle være i tvivl om det, så bare se denne her !
Her kan du se, hvordan Joe – helt uhørt – stiller kritiske spørgsmål til sine MSNBC kolleger !
Interessant . Læg mærke til, hvordan gruppeadfæren gør at de andre – pludseligt – er enige !
Men han er en enlig svale
De fleste gentager blot at Trump og Trumptilhængerne er racistiske, nazistiske osv
Bare se denne tåbelige artikel:
Ih, hvor Hillary Clinton fulgte reglerne …
Er det reglerne om at man IKKE må have sin egen ubeskyttede mail-server, hun tænker på ?
Eller er det reglene om pay for play ifbm Clinton-foundation, hun tænker på ?
Det er – selvfølgelig – helt umuligt at nogen kunne have mistro til Hillary Clintons evner og vilje til at være præsident – det kan KUN være fordi at piger ikke må være præsidenter …
Venstreorienteret logik for viderekomne …
Taget herfra, hvor du kan læse feministens artikel
Og vi snakker om forkælede børns reaktioner, så er her – utroligt nok – en CEO = direktør for et madudbringningsfirma GrubHub
som kræver af sine ansatte at hvis de er Trump tilhængere, skal de sige deres stilling op !
Bu Hu – hvis I ikke er enige med mig, er I dumme … 😦
(der skal vist stå “disagree” i stedet for “agree”, ellers passer det jo ikke )
Der må vist være muligheder for et KÆMPE sagsanlæg her, hvis der ellers er nogle, der tør !
Nye lækkede mails på wikileaks fra det demokratiske parti dokumenterer “Pay To Play”
“Pay To Play” er, hvad amerikanerne kalder “noget for noget”
Et af de lækkede dokumenter viser en liste over folk, som har doneret meget store pengebeløb op til valget i USA i 2008 til DNC ,og hvor bagefter mange har opnået vigtige poster i det amerikanske udenrigsministerium
Her er et par screendumps af den øverste del af listen:
Hvis man ellers kan stole på dokumenterne, og det er der ikke noget, der tyder på at man ikke kan,
viser det sig af blandt de 53, der har givet flest penge til Det demokratiske parti, så er 19 ! blevet udnævnt til USA ambassadører i forskellige lande – af udenskruppelmininster/udenrigsminister Hillary Clinton !
Og 4 andre har også fået “gevinst”.
Ialt er altså 23 af 53 blevet belønnet svarende til 43-44 % !
Pay To Play, så det basker
Ikke kun den, der betalte stort til det demokratiske parti blev kompenseret:
Hvis man ville have et møde med Hillary som udenrigsminister ( og ikke var en del af regeringen), hjalp det kraftigt at donere til Bil og Hillarys Foundation …
P.S. jeg er opmærksom på at også det republikanske parti tidligere har givet ambassadørposter til store donorer, men mig bekendt slet ikke i samme omfang …
Her er den bedste karrikaturtegning, jeg har set , som forklarer hvorfor Hillary Clinton sagde nej tak til den mexikanske præsidents invitation:
Hvis du vil have et møde med Hillary, skal du ligge donere til The Clinton Foundation først 🙂 🙂
Her er en video ( vi har bragt før).
Videoen er værd at se i sin helhed , men hvis du har kort tid,
så se mere om Hillarys underlige hoste 2:00 minut inde :
Her er en anden video, hvor en læge kommer med sit besyv mht hosteanfaldene :
Hillary Clinton and her media allies have been working overtime to put out numerous fires that continue to pop up and spread during the final weeks of her campaign for president.
Recently, the flames have gotten more difficult to smother as reports of Clinton’s frail health have bled into the mainstream media, despite the unanimous and unilateral decision by the MSM to treat anyone who even raises a question as akin to a Holocaust denier. (On Sunday night, for example, Huffington Post fired contributor David Seaman and deleted his columns simply for linking to a Hillary health video that’s been viewed four million times.)
[…]
Despite these ongoing scandals, Clinton’s close yet questionable ties to media outlets such as Google, CNN, PBS and The New York Times have seemed to pay off. These entities have gone out of their way to censor negative stories about Clinton, particularly ones involving the Clinton Foundation. There’s one common thread though these media outlets suppressing harmful Clinton stories all share: they’ve donated to the Clinton Foundation.
Det amerikanske statedepartment kan ikke “nå” at udgive resten af Hillarys kalender
Før efter valget …
Det skulle jo nødigt genere Hillary, vel
Det første batch fra Hillarys kalender som udenrigsminister viste jo af over halvdelen af dem, som havde fået lov til at besøge Hillary ( og som ikke var med i regeringen ) var bidragydere til The Clinton Foundation …
New York Times var engang en god avis. I dag er den bare et menighedsblad …
Forleden bragte jeg en artikel om nye opdagelser af Hillarys korruption md The Clinton Foundation:
“Mens Hillary var udenrigminister, mødtes hun med 154 personer ( som ikke var i regeringen/administrationen).
Af dem har 85 , svarende til over 55 % , doneret penge til Hillarys Clinton Foundation !
De har doneret 156 millioner $ ! Play for Play”
Hodja
husmanden
Jernhesten
nicolaisennels
trumfes
Hodjanernes Blog 