Hodjanernes Blog

1 maj 2016

Fornuftige ord om klimaet fra medstifteren af GreenPeace Patrick Moore

Filed under: Almindelig fornuft, Klima, TrumfEs, Videnskab — Tags: , , — trumfes @ 15:53

Patrick Moore har for lang tid siden forladt GreenPeace, da den er overtaget af nyttige idioter

Her er en video i serien Prager University.

Den er så god at du kan sende den til dem af dine venner, som stadig tror på menneskeskabt global opvarming …

Videon er 3/4 år gammel, men jeg har først opdaget den nu 🙂

12 december 2015

Greenpeace grundlæggeren Patrick Moore melder Greenpeace til FBI

Greenpeace, in furtherance of what is in effect its war against every species on the planet, has now turned to what, on the face of things, looks to me like outright breach of the RICO, wire-fraud, witness-tampering and obstruction-of-committee statutes. I have called in the FBI.

Greenpeace appears to have subjected Dr Will Happer, Cyrus Fogg Brackett Professor of Physics at Princeton University, to a maladroit attempt at entrapment that has badly backfired on it.

The organization I co-founded has become a monster. When I was a member of its central committee in the early days, we campaigned – usually with success – on genuine environmental issues such as atmospheric nuclear tests, whaling and seal-clubbing.

When Greenpeace turned anti-science by campaigning against chlorine (imagine the sheer stupidity of campaigning against one of the elements in the periodic table), I decided that it had lost its purpose and that, having achieved its original objectives, had turned to extremism to try to justify its continued existence.

Now Greenpeace has knowingly made itself the sworn enemy of all life on Earth. By opposing capitalism, it stands against the one system of economics that has been most successful in regulating and restoring the environment.

[…]

I am profoundly dismayed that the organization I founded – an organization that once did good work addressing real environmental concerns – has descended to what I consider to be criminality and also proposes to descend to libel.

Accordingly, I have decided to inform the Federal Bureau of Investigation of Greenpeace’s dishonest and disfiguring attempt at entrapment of Professor Happer, whom I know to be a first-rate scientist, one of the world’s half-dozen most eminent and experienced physicists, and one who would never provide any scientific advice unless in his professional opinion that advice was correct.

The organization’s timing was clearly intended to spring the trap on Professor Happer hours before he was due to appear in front of Congress. This misconduct constitutes a serious – and under many headings criminal – interference with the democratic process that America cherishes.

I have reported Greenpeace to the FBI under 18 USC 96 (RICO statute); 18 USC 1343 (wire fraud); 18 USC 1512 (tampering with a witness due to appear at a Congressional hearing); and 18 USC 1505 (obstruction of proceedings before committees).

I shall also be asking the Bureau to investigate Greenpeace’s sources of funding. It is now an enemy of the State, an enemy of humanity and, indeed, an enemy of all species on Earth.

Læs historien på Wutts Up With That

Mere om Patrick Moore

29 juli 2015

Patrick Moore forklarer, hvorfor han dannede Greenpeace og hvorfor han forlod den !

Filed under: Bøger, Grønt, Greenies, Greenpeace, TrumfEs — Tags: , — trumfes @ 18:03

GreenPeace var oprindeligt en idealistisk organisation. Det er den ikke mere !

 Videoen er fra Prager University .

 

 Patrick Moore har skrevet bogen: Confessions of a Greenpeace Dropout: The Making of a Sensible Environmentalist. Beatty Street Publishing Inc. ISBN 978-0-9864808-2-9

 Den er værd at læse !

 Her er et link til en video, hvor Ezra interviewer Patrick Moore

 Her er et link til 4 andre interessante videoer om emnet klima og miljø fra Prager University

20 april 2012

Ezra Levant interviewer Patrick Moore, Greenpeace’s grundlægger, idag modstander

Filed under: Økofascisme, Bøger, Evidens, Grønt, Greenpeace, TrumfEs, Videnskab — trumfes @ 21:21

Greenpeace ændrede sig til en religiøs gruppe ved at blæse på videnskab

 Patrick Moore har skrevet bogen :

Confessions of a Greenpeace Dropout: The Making of a Sensible Environmentalist. Beatty Street Publishing Inc. ISBN 978-0-9864808-2-9

Den har jeg anskaffet og læst – den kan bestemt anbefales til alle med en videnskabelig interesse i økologi.

Interviewet med Ezra er relativt langt, men til gengæld kommer han ind på
hvad Greenpeace stod for oprindeligt og hvad der fik han til at undsige greenpeace i detaljer.

Moore er nu tilhænger af kernekraft.

Jeg har tidligere vist en anden video med Patrick Moore:

21 september 2016

Grundlæggeren af Greenpeace fortæller, hvorfor CO2 er en god ting !

Filed under: Klima, Multi-kulti, TrumfEs, Videnskab — Tags: , , — trumfes @ 16:03

I modsætning til alle de “lærde”, som hævder at CO2 farlig

Jeg har for ikke så længe siden bragt et andet indslag med Patrick Moore

Jeg kan se at han har genbrugt noget herfra, men det gør jo ikke hans argumentation dårligere

Taget fra Vlad

14 september 2016

“CO2 er IKKE vores fjende” , tværtimod !

Filed under: FN, Greenies, IPCC, TrumfEs — Tags: , — trumfes @ 15:04

Siger Patrick Moore, grundlæggern af Greenpeace

Og han dokumenterer på smukkeste vis at der IKKE er nogen sammenhæng mellem CO2 og temperatur (dvs. der er en sammenhæng: CO2 lagger temperatur med 800 år- det vil sige at først om 800 år vil CO2 vise samme tendens som temperaturen nu)

The Rebel Media har lavet videon sammen med Patrick Moore

9 oktober 2014

LEGO har rygrad som en regnorm

Lego har i dag meddelt, at legetøjsgiganten ikke vil forlænge det samarbejde med Shell, som har kørt i de sidste par år.

Beslutningen kommer efter en kampagne som Greenpeace har ført mod Lego – med det formål at ramme Shell.

This isn’t the first time Lego bowed to Greenpeas pressure.  Maybe they hope Greenpeas won’t notice that Lego bricks are made of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene terpoloymers and is rather connected to the petrochemical industry. A company is not allowing a petrochemical company to hand out set of toys made from petrochemicals? This has got to be the most ironic situation I have seen in a long time. Let’s see how far Greenpeace would get without any oil for their ships, planes, and cars. No less the medications, clothes, food and many other items used in daily life, even in Europe. Maybe it is time to put them all on an island for a true low impact resistance.

Mere på Junk Science

Se dette interview med Greenpeace’s grundlægger Patrick Moore – han river dem totalt fra hinanden. Interviewet er fyldt med guldkorn. Alene denne: “Greenpeace vil forbyde halvdelen af det Periodisk System”. Og – Greenpeace vil ikke diskutere med ham – for de har ingen modargumenter.

Spring evt over de første 11 minutter.

31 marts 2014

Klimahystaderne kommer snart med en ny rapport… (opdateret)

Og så ved vi jo at MSM helt ukritisk vil agere papegøjer

 IPCC, FNs klimapanel har ikke engang udgivet rapporten endnu.

Men de har selvfølgelig lækket den.

Og TV2′ “journalister” gør, som de bliver bedt om og bringer et totalt ukritisk indlæg, der – som sædvanligt – maler fanden på væggen.

TV2 nævnte ikke med et eneste ord at der ikke har været nogen stigning i den gennemsnitlige temperatur på jorden de sidste 17-18 år !
Eller at samtlige klimamodeller inkl. FN har skudt helt over målet.

For hvis man bringer den slags fakta, så kunne det danske folk jo tro at det bare var hysteri.

Hvis du vil vide mere om emnet, har Synopsisolsen gjort et stort arbejde med at oversætte en glimrende artikel, hvor Patrick Moore, – en af grundlæggerne af GreenPeace, dengang det var en miljøorganisation og ikke en venstreorienteret troesretning – fortæller om hvorfor man ikke kan stole på klimahystaderne (mit ordvalg)

Få lidt modgift ved at læse artiklen her

Jeg ville gerne have kopieret hele artiklen, men jeg er ikke helt sikker på om Synopsisolsen synes det er ok. Så du må klikke på ovenstående link – det fortjener det.

TV2 er ikke det eneste medie, som helt ukritisk maler fanden på væggen og ikke modererer på nogen måde.

Bare se Ekstrabladet her, som har klippet et indlæg fra Ritzau . EB burde vide bedre.

En lille update: en professor trækker sig, fordi rapporten blev for alarmerende,
Læs her

18 januar 2012

Grundlæggeren af Greenpeace undsiger nu Greenpeace

Filed under: Økofascisme, Grønt, Greenies, Greenpeace, TrumfEs — Tags: , — trumfes @ 17:18

Patrick Moore, som var med til at starte Greenpeace, har skrevet en bog “Confessions of a Greenpeace Dropout: The Making of a Sensible Environmentalist”, hvori han gør op med Greenpeace og menneskeskabt global warming

Her et et link til Erza Levants indslag om ham og Greenpeace

20 oktober 2011

RAF regeringen vil lægge store biler for had bl. a. på grund af CO2-påvirkningen

Consider the effect of the realisation of the Greenpeace dream: the owners of every single SUV in the United States – all 28.3 million of them – trading in their vehicles for an average compact, the former to be sensitively destroyed (or delivered to deserving Mongolian film teams).

According to the DoE figures, to do so would result in a savings of 2.6 tons (9.8 vs 7.2) of per vehicle CO2 equivalent per year, for a total of 74 million tons (67.3 million metric tonnes). Given the total US level of 7.122 billion tonnes annually (PDF), our analysis reveals that American emissions after the big SUV trade-in would decrease by less than one percent, to 99.0554% of their previous levels. Global emissions of 28 billion tonnes would decline to a mere 99.7597% of the original total.

In other words, it is inconceivable that even this impossibly extreme response to the Greenpeace anti-SUV campaign would have the slightest effect on climate change this century. It’s clear in light of the numbers that to maintain otherwise is irrational – if one is indeed motivated by environmental considerations.

Fra en tidligere Hodja post.

Så er det man spørger – de danske tal er selvfølgelig en del mindre – hvor stor er CO2 besparelsen på at udskifte bilparken? Har det overhovedet nogen effekt i det samlede billede af den danske CO2 produktion? Det er selvfølgelig, hvis man overhovedet tror på, at CO2 har nogensomhelst betydning.

Eller er det et udslag af, at når man ikke kan få indført millionærskatten, så kan man ramme de ‘rige’ på bilerne?

Vi giver det sidste ord til Greenpeacegrudlæggeren Patrick Moore:

“Since I left Greenpeace, I have seen the movement drift into extremism, abandoning common sense and logic. To a large extent, it is being hijacked by activists who are using green rhetoric to launch agendas that don’t have much to do with ecology.”

6 april 2006

Greenpeace kører en kampagne mod SUV’er og DR har selvfølgelig været med på vognen

Scott Burgess har regnet på det:

Consider the effect of the realisation of the Greenpeace dream: the owners of every single SUV in the United States – all 28.3 million of them – trading in their vehicles for an average compact, the former to be sensitively destroyed (or delivered to deserving Mongolian film teams).

According to the DoE figures, to do so would result in a savings of 2.6 tons (9.8 vs 7.2) of per vehicle CO2 equivalent per year, for a total of 74 million tons (67.3 million metric tonnes). Given the total US level of 7.122 billion tonnes annually (PDF), our analysis reveals that American emissions after the big SUV trade-in would decrease by less than one percent, to 99.0554% of their previous levels. Global emissions of 28 billion tonnes would decline to a mere 99.7597% of the original total.

In other words, it is inconceivable that even this impossibly extreme response to the Greenpeace anti-SUV campaign would have the slightest effect on climate change this century. It’s clear in light of the numbers that to maintain otherwise is irrational – if one is indeed motivated by environmental considerations.

Han giver det sidste ord til Greenpeacegrudlæggeren Patrick Moore:

“Since I left Greenpeace, I have seen the movement drift into extremism, abandoning common sense and logic. To a large extent, it is being hijacked by activists who are using green rhetoric to launch agendas that don’t have much to do with ecology.”

Så DR – den der kampagne kan I godt putte i mølposen, og næste gang I kører med på noget, skulle I måske selv undersøge det selv istedet for at gå ud fra, at bare det kommer fra de grønne er det rigtigt. Som han skriver, så handler det ikke om økologi, men om klassekamp og kamp mod kapitalismen.

Læs resten hos Scott, han er næsten altid meget morsom og sarkastisk.