Hodjanernes Blog

20 februar 2011

Mark Steyn om deltids-pædofili

Den nye dyd for denne verdens stampister, Lars Barfødder, voldtægtsonkler, pædofile og alle andre politisk korrekte: vedholdenhed!

Mark Steyn: “Well, that’s what Perry Mason would have called it. But 21st century Europe is a long way from Erle Stanley Gardner. On Tuesday, in a story headlined “Austrian Court Upholds Islam’s Blasphemy Rules“, Nina Shea reported:

Today, Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff, a young Viennese mother, was convicted under section 283 of the Austrian penal code of vilifying religious teachings for her negative commentary on Islam in a lecture before a political-party gathering in Vienna; she was fined 480 Euros. Sabaditsch-Wolff, a diplomat’s daughter, had lived and worked for several years in various Middle Eastern Muslim countries, and at the lecture in question spoke critically of the treatment of women and the practice of jihad in Iran, Libya, and other places that she had lived in.

Frau Sabaditsch-Wolff’s case came up while I was off with various health issues, but I said a few words about it when I was in Ottawa. This was Austria’s contribution to the hottest trend on the Continent – heresy trials. Officially, Mrs Sabaditsch-Wolff and Geert Wilders and Lars Hedegaard are in the dock as heretics against post-Christian Europe’s new religion of “multiculturalism”. But that’s just a transitional stage. As I wrote of the Wilders trial: The good news is that the Openbaar Ministerie is doing such a grand job with its pilot program of apostasy prosecutions you’ll barely notice when sharia is formally adopted.

Elisabeth’s case attracted less attention than most of the others. In a follow-up, Nina Shea speculated as to why that might be: This is probably due to the fact that she is an ordinary person and not an acclaimed writer, politician, or celebrity (think Mark Steyn, Geert Wilders, and Brigitte Bardot) — the most prominent examples of the growing ranks of Western Europeans and Canadians who have faced legal problems for criticizing Islamic teachings. I think it’s also that Austria does not resonate in the imagination as a beacon of individual liberty in the way that the anglophone democracies and certain Continental countries do – or did. Nevertheless, this is a very dark decision. If Lars Hedegaard was acquitted on a technicality, Mrs Sabaditsch-Wolff was convicted on one. See if you can follow the judge’s “thinking“: The integration of Muslims is surely a question of particular public interest – you are allowed to be critical – but not incitement of hatred…

The language used in the seminars were not inciting hatred, but the utterances regarding muhammad and paedophilia were punishable. “Paedophilia” is factually incorrect, since paedophilia is a sexual preference which solely or mainly is directed towards children. Nevertheless, it does not apply to Mohammad. He was still married to Aisha when she was 18. It is a “denigration of religious teachings” and are found guilty and sentenced to 120 days, which approaches the minimum of € 480. So, although Mohammed deflowered Aisha when she was nine, it is “factually incorrect” to call him a pedophile because he was still hot for her when she was in her late teens? As a point of law, it’s not where you start, it’s where you finish – and you’re gonna finish on top! Does this judicial ruling apply to all Austrians partial to a piece of underage totty? For example, Wolfgang Priklopil:

The Austrian girl who was kidnapped at the age of ten and imprisoned for eight years in a dungeon-like basement room by a pedophile predator who committed suicide when she escaped last week… Whoa, whoa, hold up there. How can you say Herr Priklopil was a “pedophile” when he was still having sex with her when she was 18? And so were all his friends: A dormant investigation into one of Austria’s most notorious kidnap cases is likely to be reopened after suggestions that Natascha Kampusch, the schoolgirl who vanished for eight years, was not held in a cellar throughout her ordeal as had been widely believed and may have been the victim of a paedophile ring rather than of a lone perpetrator.

Hey, don’t worry, says an Austrian judge. It’s not a “pedophile ring” if she still turns you on a week after she reaches the age of consent. Or does this dispensation only apply to the Prophet (peace and get-out-of-jail-free cards be upon him)?  – In 1998, Terrence McNally wrote Corpus Christi, a hit Broadway play about a gay Jesus. Could you write one about a gay Mohammed? Or would that also be ruled “factually incorrect”? – During my difficulties with the “human rights” regime in Canada, Kathy Shaidle liked to taunt the state enforcers with the line “You’re not smart enough to tell me how to live.” They’re certainly too stupid to tell us what to think. Yet, in torturing logic and law and liberty in ever more inane ways, judges and prosecutors send a consistent message that makes perfect sense to Islamic imperialists – that Islam is hedged off from the norms of intellectual scrutiny that apply to any other ideology, and that in recognition of that privileged protection judges, prosecutors and governments are happy to toss core western values overboard.

This is a disgraceful decision. Elisabeth is appealing it, and she deserves your full support. – In related multiculti Euro-news: Swedish laws against forced marriages and child marriages are not effective, the country’s migration board stated…But what’s the big deal about that? I mean, it’s not like she’ll be a child forever, right?”

8 kommentarer »

  1. Vi har da heldigvis et dansk ord, der ‘dækker fuldt ud’ – børneskænder….


    Kommentar af Fidibus — 20 februar 2011 @ 10:36

    • Du har ganske ret. Det viser, at selv vi hodjanere ligger under for den grasserende fremmedordsmani. Vi beklager. Men det er fint, at du gør os danskere opmærksom på ordet, idet der antagelig vil gå nogen tid inden Lars “Allah-hu-ak” Barfoed og hans PK-Schutz-Staffel af statsadvokater opdager at det betyder det samme som det forbudte “pædofil”. Vi kan således kalde en børneskænder for en børneskænder og en spade for en spade indtil stampisterne har lært dansk. Hvilket nok vil tage sin tid…


      Kommentar af Skjoldungen — 20 februar 2011 @ 11:15

  2. Islam for begyndere.

    Hvis du er pædofil og forgriber dig seksuelt på et barn på ni år, kan du slippe for en anklage hvis du stadig er varm på barnet, når hun er blevet 18.

    Og selv om du fortsætter dine seksuelle overgreb på hende de næste 8 år, kan du ikke blive anklaget for at gøre noget forkert, fordi du stadig kommer sammen med hende, når hun er 18.

    Dette gælder dog foreløbig kun i Østrig, hvor dommerne – særlig kvinderne – er styret af et særligt gen for logik og sunde fornuft.

    Men husk på du skal være muslim, ellers gælder det ikke. Og hvis du samtidig har lyst til at udtale offentligt, at Jesus var en led homokarl, pædofil og voldtog små drenge ned i vuggealderen, behøver du intet at frygte. Du skal bare sige de gyldne ord: Allah! Gud er stor, så forstår den offentlige anklager straks din specielle status som omvandrende kulturberiger. Særligt hvis det er en kvinde.

    Og er du klog, skal du dog ikke protestere over at blive hivet i retten, for når du igen forlader den, er du beriget med en passende stor sum penge i erstatning og kan udskifte din Mercedes med en Porsche.


    Kommentar af machiavelli — 20 februar 2011 @ 11:53

    • Man bør nok ikke glemme et efterhånden temmelig udbredt mellemnavn: ali ‘jeg ved hvor du og din familie bor’ mohamged…..


      Kommentar af Fidibus — 20 februar 2011 @ 13:36

    • De der muslimsvin skulle udryddes.


      Kommentar af Nielsen — 20 februar 2011 @ 21:33

  3. Ja nu bør østrigste forsvarsadvokater begynde, at henvise til den her sag.

    Jura omkring pædofili har fået en helt ny betydning.


    Kommentar af jernhesten — 20 februar 2011 @ 13:53

  4. Absurd teater! Kafka kunde ikke have forestillet sig dette.!


    Kommentar af karl — 20 februar 2011 @ 17:19

  5. Ja nu er der skabt præcedens på området. Og enhver pædofil, der bliver behandlet i retssystemet kan udtale:

    “Ja! fru dommer, pigen er ganske vist kun 9 år gammel, men en dag bliver hun atten. Husk! Muhammed-dommen”.

    “Hm! ja det er rigtigt. Hvad er din religion?”

    “Jeg er en god Kristen, fru dommer.”

    “Hm! Den anklagede er hermed dømt 3 md. i fængsel plus en bøde på 480 euro. Retten er hævet”.


    Kommentar af machiavelli — 21 februar 2011 @ 08:51

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Skriv et svar

Udfyld dine oplysninger nedenfor eller klik på et ikon for at logge ind:

WordPress.com Logo

Du kommenterer med din WordPress.com konto. Log Out /  Skift )

Google photo

Du kommenterer med din Google konto. Log Out /  Skift )

Twitter picture

Du kommenterer med din Twitter konto. Log Out /  Skift )

Facebook photo

Du kommenterer med din Facebook konto. Log Out /  Skift )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: