Dette er bare en af dagens adskillige forbrydelser med udlændinge som gerningsmænd.
En ung kvinde blev tidligt fredag morgen skubbet ind i en varebil i Meløse. Mens den ene mand kørte bilen, voldtog den anden mand kvinden, skriver Frederiksborg Amts Avis.
The population of Britain comprises 86% native Brits, and 14% non-Brits (defined earlier). That means that for every one non-Brit of all kinds in Britain there are six native Brits. It follows from that, that if immigrants and Brits are murdering each other at equal rates, then for every one murder of a Brit by an immigrant there should be six murders of immigrants by Brits. That would make us equally lethal towards each other.
Is this what the numbers say? Hardly.
For the two and a half years from January 2005 up until the beginning of this month, June 2007, exactly 8 non-Brits of all kinds have been murdered by native Brits. So to be approximately equal in our rates of murdering each other, just one – or perhaps two – native Brits should have been murdered by non-Brits. What is the actual number of native Brits murdered by non-Brits in this time: one? two? Well no actually, it’s 123.
If we look at it the other way around: as 123 native Brits have been murdered by non-Brits in that two and a half years, then to maintain proportionality in our rates of murdering each other, according to our numbers in the population, we should have murdered 123 (murder of Brits by non-Brits) x 6 (number of times by which Brits outnumber non-Brits in the population) = 738 non-Brits.
Instead : 8.
We murdered 8 of them. To maintain proportionality with relative numbers in the population, they should have murdered 8/6 = 1.33 (recurring) of us. They actually murdered 123 of us. So their rate of murdering us is 123/1.33 = 92.48 times our rate of murdering them (the slight difference is caused by the recurrence). Again, by the same mathematical rules, this comes out as a straight 92.
There doesn’t seem to be much doubt about it: non-Brits – in Britain – are murdering Brits at a rate 92 times higher than Brits are murdering non-Brits.
We can translate that number into a measure of the murderous inclinations of our people/culture as against the murderous inclinations of the aggregate of all the other people/cultures present here:
The aggregate of the other peoples/cultures present here is 92 times more murderously inclined than is our own people/culture.
Of course, this minor study takes no account of other crimes such as rape, paedophilia, grooming, robbery with violence (mugging), etc. Be nice if the authorities published nationality/race/culture statistics for all these other crimes …
I suppose it should be possible to pin down exactly which peoples/cultures are the really dangerous ones. After all, there are plenty of Germans, French, Dutch, Australians, Chinese, Hindu and Sikh Indians, etc here, but they don’t seem to be much in the news for murdering (etc) Brits.
I used the figures 86% – 14%, which meant there were 6 times more Brits than non-Brits. Suppose I had used the figures 90% – 10%, which is closer to what the multiculturalists claim in an effort to convince us there’s no immigration problem. Well, that would mean that there are 9 Brits here for every 1 non-Brit. So, to maintain proportionality relative to numbers, to be equally murderously inclined, Brits would have had to have murdered 123 x 9 = 1107 non-Brits in that two and a half years. Brits actually murdered 8, so non-Brits would be murdering Brits at 1107/8 = 138.375 times the rate at which Brits would be murdering non-Brits. Therefore the murderous inclination of the aggregate of the non-Brit people/cultures here in Britain would be 138 (mathematical rule) times worse than that of the native Brit people/culture.
So you see, when the multiculturalists try to allay our fears by claiming the percentage of non-Brits is lower, then in actual fact they are increasing our fears by telling us that these other cultures are even more murderously inclined than we already know they are.
Take care on your way home tonight.
Det drejer sig IKKE om briter, der dræber briter eller indvandrere der dræber indvandrere. Kun om indvandrere der dræber briter og vice versa. Altså drab der finder sted som følge af det multikuturelle samfund.
Limewoody
Selvfølgelig kan de nuttede kræ svømme 🙂
Og det er selvfølgelig uden burkini.
Måske kan vor ven Griseavleren komme med nogle indspark her?
Tak til Homer S.
“Jeg vil gerne komme med den her bemærkninig til en heks som Pia Kjærsgaard og deres racistiske udtalelser, hvad angår islam og muslimer – det kan vi ikke bruge til noget. Vi har ikke fået noget ud af den lov i Danmark, der er handikappet”
Hvor lavt skal vi synke? Påstår Islamisk Trossamfund nu at der findes en race af landsforrædere?
Hodja udtaler: Kasem Ahmad er den største og mest ubegavede narrøv vi længe har set. Hvad vil han og hans ligesindede egentlig her i landet, når de alligevel ikke vil anerkende vore domstoles afgørelser (når de går muslimerne imod), men straks efter domsafsigelsen begynder at råbe op om muftier og fatwaer?
“Retten mener, at udtryk som landsforræderi, femte kolonne virksomhed, misinformation og løgnehistorier må opfattes som Pia Kjærsgaards vurdering af delegationernes aktivitet, og at udtalelserne derfor er udtryk for en værdidom.”
Islamisk Trossamfund havde krævet 30.000 kroner for tort, men er istedet dømt til at betale sagens omkostninger på 40.000 kroner. I sandhed en fredag den 13. for Trossamfundet.
Iøvrigt kan man roligt sige, at det ikke bare er Pia Kjærsgaards vurdering af imamernes opførsel, det er rigtig mange danskeres holdning. Tillykke Pia! Vi har ikke shariah i Danmark endnu.
Pia Kjærsgaards pressemeddelse
Talsmand for Islamisk Trossamfund, der overvejer at anke til Landsretten, Kasem Ahmad udtaler at:
“Der er åbenbart ingen grænser for de injurierende udtalelser, der kommer fra politikerne om det muslimske trossamfund.”
Hov min fine ven, hvem var det der rejste rundt i de muslimske lande med forfalskede muhammedbilleder og løgnagtige oplysninger, som medførte boykot af danske varer, afbrænding af skandinaviske ambassader samt 70-80 menneskers død?
Men det er klart, at hvis man ikke betragter sig selv som dansker, så er man jo ikke landsforræder i egne øjne.
De personer Pia Kjærsgaard er frikendt for at kalde landsforrædere:
Mohamad Al Khaled Samha (Abu Bashar), Zeki Kocer, Ahmed Mohamad Mostafa Harby, Sarvar Shoudri, Nour-Edin Fattah, Raed Hlayhel, Kasem Said Ahmad, Ahmed Akkari, Mahmoud Mansour.
Denne gang vil delegationerne kræve, at der bliver udstedt en fatwa mod Jyllands-Posten.
Fatwa mig her og fatwa mig der. Indse da for helvede at I har tabt – både her og i Frankrig (Hebdo-affæren).
Men de danske imamer er måske indstillet på at være skyld i tabe af endnu 70-80 menneskeliv på grund af nogle tegninger?
READ MY LIPS: R-E-J-S H-J-EM T-I-L M-E-L-L-E-M-Ø-S-T-E-N O-G B-L-I-V D-E-R !!!
Following is an excerpt from an interview with Ahmad Jibril, Secretary-General of the PFLP General Command, which aired on Al-Manar TV on July 5, 2007:
Ahmad Jibril: When Abu Mazen came to Damascus with his team, I asked them: “What happened to the investigation into the death of Abu Ammar [Arafat]? The Israelis killed him. He was my colleague ever since 1965 and used to sleep at my home. He and I followed the same path.” Is it conceivable that when Rafiq Al-Hariri was killed, all hell broke loose, even though he was just a merchant in Saudi Arabia, who later entered politics, whereas the death of Yasser Arafat, who for 40 years had been carrying his gun from one place to another, is not investigate? Is this conceivable? They were silent, and then one of them said to me: “To be honest, the French gave us the medical report, that stated that the cause of Abu Ammar’s death was AIDS.” I am not saying this, they did. Now they pretend that they miss Yasser Arafat, and complain that [Hamas] entered his house in [Gaza] and so on… I say to every honorable member of the Fatah movement that he should be happy that we got rid of the plague, which had been imposed upon them and upon the Palestinian people. The Fatah movement now has an opportunity to renew itself.
Disse oplysninger stemmer jo godt overens med hvad jeg tidligere har skrevet om Arafat.
Limewoody
Artiklen er fyldt med misinformation, palæstinensisk propaganda og venstreorienteret sludder.
Så ved vi hvor vi IKKE skal handle. De ryger ud sammen med Arla mm.
Forlaget Egmont, som udgiver Tintin, fortæller, at den allerede i dag bliver leveret til forretningerne med en advarende banderole om.
Her står, at tegneserien indeholder
»..småborgerlige, patriarkalske stereotyper fra perioden – en fortolkning nogle læsere kan finde stødende«.
Mere på Politiken
Hvad med at forbyde alt? Sådan at kun det der er godkendt må være offentligt tilgængeligt?
The politically correct directives are believed to be behind ministers not using words such as “Muslim’’ about Britain’s terrorism crisis.
Yesterday the Daily Express reported how Gordon Brown’s ministers had been told to avoid inflammatory language when speaking about the attempted car bomb attacks in London and Glasgow.
Neither the Prime Minister in a major interview nor Home Secretary Jacqui Smith in the Commons referred to Muslims or Islam.
Last night critics pointed to a classified EU document sent out to all European governments offering “non-offensive’’ phrases to use when discussing terrorism.
Banned terms were said to include “jihad’’, “Islamic’’ or “fundamentalist”.
Mere på Daily Express
Og her kunne vi igen indsætte Basil fra ‘Fawlty Towers’ – Don’t mention the war’!
Hodjanernes Blog 