Hodjanernes Blog

1 juli 2017

‘Forskere’ har forfalsket videnskabelige data om luftforurening i The New England Journal og Medicine

Epidemiologen J. Enstrom gennemhuller artikel der taler for strammere regulering af luftforurening.

“The authors have falsified their research findings.”

Nyt studie har analyseret mere end 2 millioner dødsfald i Californien i relation til luftforurening med PM2,5.

Konklusionen lyder:

In summary, our empirical evidence, supported by literature and logic, is that current levels of air quality, ozone and PM2.5, are not associated with or causally related to acute deaths for California. Our results, well summarized in Fig. 4 ;  Fig. 5, show no effect of ozone or PM2.5 at 12 μg/m3 or across all doses examined. There is no indication of any effect at low doses, for example. These results should be taken into account in any future revisions of the NAAQS for PM2.5 and O3.

ANTI-GREEN

Læs også: It’s unprecedented in the history of business — the largest U.S. oil company Exxon Mobil (XOM)  has been officially captured by anti-oil political activists.

BOOK REVIEW: ‘Scare Pollution’ a Pulitzer Prize-worthy Piece of Investigative Journalism

Most of the American public is unaware the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), with the help of the American Lung Association and radical environmental groups, has nearly succeeded in an attempted takeover of absolutely all industry in the United States. How could EPA accomplish such a grand scheme? By claiming exposure to particles in the air as small as 2.5 millionths of a meter can cause death in a matter of minutes, hours, or days.

It is called the PM2.5 rule, and the best scientific research shows these particles are ubiquitous and, contrary to EPA’s claims, are harmless.

10 april 2017

The EPA Lied — Nobody Died

The EPA human experiments controversy is now over.

As between choosing whether EPA committed multiple felonies vs. lying to the Congress/public about PM2.5 killing people, the National Academy of Sciences has chosen the “lying’ option. Total victory achieved.

A controversy that first appeared in these pages five years ago, came to an end last week. The National Academy of Sciences (NAS) concluded that human experiments with air pollutants conducted by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) were not dangerous — meaning EPA has been lying to the public and Congress for years about the extreme danger of the “pollutants” in question.

[…]

So when the first Obama EPA administrator, Lisa Jackson, testified to Congress that “Particulate matter causes premature death. It does not make you sick. It is directly causal to dying sooner than you should,” that was a lie, one compounded by her next false claim that particulate matter kills about 570,000 Americans per year.

[…]

As it turns out, the only time EPA told the truth about particulate matter was when it told its human guinea pigs that the experiments were harmless. Meanwhile the Obama EPA used the phony killer particulate matter scare — backed by almost $600 million in utterly fraudulent scientific research and fueled with secret scientific data — to virtually wipe out the U.S. coal industry, severely harming coal miners, their families and their communities.

Mere på Junk Science

Hvad siger danske miljømyndigheder? Ingenting! De vil fortsætte med at lade som om PM2.5 er sundhedsskadeligt og indføre alskens begrænsninger på danskerne.

5 april 2017

Ny forskning om luftforurening

Filed under: Almindelig fornuft, Evidens, Medicin, USA/Canada, Videnskab — Tags: , — Hodja @ 17:17

Udendørs luft er farligere end tobaksrygning!

Og en mindre mængde af luftforurening er farligere end en større mængde.

Fra JunkScienceJunkScience:

The National Academy of Sciences was hired by the EPA to whitewash the agency’s program of illegal human experiments. And it did. But in doing so it vindicated the basic point about EPA — the agency lied to the public about the alleged dangers of PM2.5.

21 marts 2017

Epidemiologiske studier over luftforurening er utroværdige

LUFTFORURENING

Læs mere på Junk Science og læs Steve Milloys bog “Scare pollution” – den kan anbefales.

Som jeg så ofte har skrevet: epidemiologi er statistik, der intet sikkert siger om årsager, det fatter journalister ikke.

Læs mere om The Secret Science Reform Act, der kan vende hele forskningen om luftforurening på hovedet.