Hodjanernes Blog

11 juni 2015

PET-dokumenter sparker på ny gang i historisk injuriesag

15 dokumenter fra Politiets Efterretningstjeneste er blevet offentliggjort i forbindelse med injuriesagen mellem koldkrigsforsker Bent Jensen og journalist Jørgen Dragsdahl.

Bent Jensen-Foreningen har lagt både citater fra originale dokumenter fra PET og affotografering af dokumenterne ud på foreningens hjemmeside.

Mere på Berlingske

Du kan finde dokumenterne her, hvor du også kan støtte Bent Jensen økonomisk.

25 oktober 2013

Østre Landsret har den 25. oktober 2013 afsagt dom i en injuriesag anlagt af journalist Jørgen Dragsdahl mod historiker Bent Jensen.

Selv om Jørgen Dragsdahl således aldrig har været sigtet, tiltalt eller dømt for overtrædelse af straffelovens § 108, og der ikke er ført bevis for, at Jørgen Dragsdahl rent faktisk var agent for KGB, finder landsretten efter en samlet afvejning af hensynet til ytringsfrihed over for hensynet til respekt for privatliv, at Bent Jensens fremsættelse af ærefornærmende sigtelser mod Jørgen Dragsdahl om agentvirksomhed og desinformation var berettiget efter straffelovens § 267 og § 269, stk. 1, som fortolket i lyset af artikel 8 og artikel 10 i Den Europæiske Menneskerettighedskonvention.

Mere på Østre Landsret

Læs en gammel artikel om Dragsdahls økonomiske bagmænd – de får forhåbentlig mægtig ondt i tegnebøgerne nu 🙂

6 november 2011

KGB-chef: Jeg gav DKP-toppen penge til det sidste

KGB’s sidste chef i Danmark står for første gang frem og fortæller, at Danmarks Kommunistiske Parti, DKP, modtog kontanter fra Moskva frem til kort før Sovjetunionens sammenbrud i 1991, og at nuværende erhvervs- og vækstminister Ole Sohn (SF) som DKP-formand vidste det.

Mere på Jyllands-Posten

7 oktober 2011

Ole Sohn i lommen på KGB

Sovjetekspert Flemming Rose skriver i Jyllands-Posten: Vidne: Ole Sohn var hæler for Moskva.

De illegale overførsler til Danmark og Ole Sohn foregik på følgende måde: Den internationale afdeling i centralkomiteen bestilte de aftalte beløb i kontanter hos den sovjetiske nationalbank.
Derpå ankom en betroet officer fra KGB’s første hoveddirektorat til centralkomiteen, modtog pengene og kvitterede for dem. Dernæst blev pengene ad sikre kanaler bragt til Danmark, hvor enten den lokale KGB-chef eller formanden for ambassadens partikomite afleverede dem til Ole Sohn. Han blev bedt om at kvittere for modtagelsen, hvorpå der gik et dokument fra den sovjetiske ambassade i København tilbage til KGB’s hovedkvarter og centralkomiteens internationale afdeling i Moskva. Af dokumentet fremgik det, at operationen var gennemført.
Anatolij Smirnov, hvordan kan du være sikker på, at netop Ole Sohn modtog de næsten 1,2 mio. kr., som der i oktober 1989 er kvitteret for i den dokumentation, du er i besiddelse af? Kan det ikke have været en anden? »Nej, jeg er 100 pct. sikker på, at det forholder sig sådan.
« Men kunne det ikke være en anden end Sohn, der modtog pengene? »Ikke når hans navn står på dokumenterne. Ifølge den instruks, der beskrev, hvordan overførslerne skulle finde sted, var det den danske partiformand eller en person, han havde givet fuldmagt, der kunne modtage pengene. Ingen andre.

Jyllands-Posten 5. oktober 2011

Det fremgår, at ikke alene Ole Sohn men også Helle Thorning-Schmidt har et stort problem her. Det er mærkeligt, at vor nye statsmedister i går aftes på landsdækkende TV kunne påstå ‘intet at kende til sagen’. Mon ikke hun kommer til at beskæftige sig med den i den nærmeste fremtid? Hvad siger NATO til, at vi har en tidligere KGB-associeret person i regeringen?

24 august 2010

Dommen i Dragsdahl sagen

Hverken Berlingeren, Weekendavisen, Politiken eller Information er interesserede i en juridisk gennemgang af dommen i Dragsdahl-sagen.

Her er det, denne landsdækkende presse ikke vil have.

Af professor, jur. dr. Ole Hasselbalch

29 juni 2010

McCarthy og Verona papirerne

Following the fall of the Soviet Union in the 1990s, enormous amounts of data became available, including the Venona papers:

Coded messages from the KGB and other communist intelligence agencies about communist agents in the United States   (Evans, M. Stanton.  Blacklisted By History:  The Untold Story of Senator Joe McCarthy and His Fight Against America’s Enemies).

We also know now that CPUSA was a faithful creature of the Soviet Union.  “Far from being mere indigenous radicals working for peace and social justice, as sometimes argued, the party and its members were subservient tools of Moscow-and those who weren’t subversive didn’t stay very long as members.”  (Evans, Pg.  20):

From a composite of all these data, it’s evident the Soviet/Communist operation in the United States, as elsewhere, was vast, sophisticated, and effective, nowhere more so than in seeking positions of official influence.  The Red networks reached into virtually every important aspect of the US government, up to very high levels, the State Department notably included.  All of which was obviously congruent with the warnings of McCarthy and others who sounded the alarm about such matters in the late 1940s and early ’50s.  There was in fact an immense conspiracy afoot, there were secret Communists burrowing in the woodwork, and these Communists were, in case after case, devoted agents of the Soviet Union. (Evans, Pg.  21).

Læs mere på Joy Tiz

18 maj 2010

Bæltedyret

Frank Aaen er i disse dage i alle medier for at udtrykke sin kritik af krigen i Afghanistan i anledning af filmen Armadillo.

Da bemeldte person i 1980 besøgte KGB-fængslet i Afghanistan, udtrykte han da sin afsky for Sovjetunionens krigsførelse og tortur af fanger? Og hvis han havde gjort det, hvad var da sket med ham?

1 april 2009

Monster: Stalins hemmelige politi

Filed under: Øst-Europa, Evidens, Historie, Sovjet/Rusland, Totalitære, Venstrefløjen, WWII — Tags: , , , , — Hodja @ 09:14

11 februar 2008

Soviet Subversion of the Free World Press – 1984

Yuri Bezmenov, a Russian born, KGB trained subverter tells about the influence of the Soviet Union on Western media and describes the stages of communist takeovers.This interview was conducted by G. Edward Griffin in 1984

Tid: 1 time 22 minutter.

This video has been remastered and is now available on DVD. See http://realityzone.com/bezmenov.html 

2 november 2007

Gensyn med Afghanistan

Det forlyder i nyhederne, at Frank Aaen følger efter AFR’s kampagnebus iført Guantanamodragt.

kgb.jpg

Er der nogen, der følger efter Frank Aaen i afghansk KGB-fangedragt?

6 oktober 2007

Kremlologi

Programmed to Kill

Frontpage Interview’s guest today is Lt. Gen. Ion Mihai Pacepa, the highest ranking intelligence official ever to have defected from the Soviet bloc. In 1989, Romania’s president Nicolae Ceausescu and his wife were executed at the end of a trial where most of the accusations had come word-for-word out of Pacepa’s book, Red Horizons, republished in 27 countries. Pacepa’s newest book is Programmed to Kill: Lee Harvey Oswald, the Soviet KGB, and the Kennedy Assassination.

FP: Lt. Gen Ion Mihai Pacepa, welcome to Frontpage Interview.

Pacepa: It is a great honor for me to be here. Yours is one of the few magazines that truly understand the Kremlin.

FP: Mr. Pacepa, you had direct knowledge of the KGB’s ties to Oswald and you also have had access to newly disclosed KGB documents. Tell us a bit about your own personal expertise in terms of this subject and the recently declassified evidence you have seen. Then kindly share with us the conclusions you have arrived at.

Pacepa: Moscow, of course, admitted nothing to us, the leaders of the Soviets’ surrogate intelligence services, about any involvement in the Kennedy assassination. The Kremlin knew that any indiscretion could start World War III. But for 15 years of my other life at the top of the Soviet bloc intelligence community, I was involved in a world-wide disinformation effort aimed at diverting attention away from the KGB’s involvement with Lee Harvey Oswald, the American Marine who had defected to Moscow, returned to the U.S., and killed President Kennedy.

We launched rumors, published articles and even produced books insinuating that the culprits were in the U.S., not in the Soviet Union. Our ultimate “proof” was a note addressed to “Mr. Hunt,” dated November 8, 1963 and signed by Oswald, copies of which turned up in the U.S. in 1975. We knew the note was faked, but American graphological experts certified that it was genuine, and conspiracy theorists connected it to the CIA’s E. Howard Hunt, by then well known from the Watergate affair, and used it to “prove” that the CIA was implicated in the Kennedy assassination.

Original KGB documents in the Mitrokhin Archive, brought to light in the 1990s, finally proved that the note was forged by the KGB during the Watergate scandal. The forged note was twice checked for “authenticity” by the KGB’s Technical Operations Directorate (OTU) and approved for use. In 1975 the KGB mailed three photocopies of the note from Mexico to conspiracy buffs in the United States.[1] (The KGB rules allowed only photocopies of counterfeited documents to be used, to avoid close examination of the original).

After the Soviet Union collapsed, I hoped the new leaders in Moscow might reveal the KGB hand in the Kennedy assassination. Instead, in 1993 they published Passport to Assassination: the Never-Before-Told Story of Lee Harvy Oswald by the KGB Colonel Who Knew Him, a book claiming that a thorough investigation into Oswald had found no Soviet involvement with him whatsoever.[2] Hangmen do not incriminate themselves.

FP: Can you go into a bit of detail about what the Mitrokhin Archive is?

Pacepa: In the 1990s, retired KGB officer Vasily Mitrokhin, helped by the British MI6, smuggled ca 25,000 pages of highly confidential KGB documents out of Moscow. They represent a minuscule part of the KGB archive, estimated to be some 27 billion pages (the East German Stasi archive had 3 billion). Nevertheless, the FBI described the Mitrokhin Archive as “the most complete and extensive intelligence ever received from any source.” According to this archive, the first American book on the assassination, Oswald: Assassin or Fall Guy?, which blames the CIA and the FBI for the crime, was masterminded by the KGB. The book’s author, Joachim Joesten, a German-born American communist, spent five days in Dallas after the assassination, then went to Europe and disappeared from sight. A few months later Joesten’s book was published by American communist Carlo Aldo Marzani (New York), who received $80,000 from the KGB to produce pro-Soviet books, plus an annual $10,000 to advertise them aggressively. Other documents in the Mitrokhin Archive identify the first American reviewer of this book, Victor Perlo, as an undercover KGB operative.

Joesten’s book was dedicated to American Mark Lane, described in the Mitrokhin Archive as a leftist who anonymously received money from the KGB. In 1966 Lane published the bestseller Rush to Judgment, alleging that Kennedy was killed by a right-wing American group. These two books encouraged people with any remotely related background expertise to join the fray. Each viewed events from his own perspective, but all accused elements in the U.S. of that crime. New Orleans district attorney Jim Garrison looked around his home district and in 1967 arrested a local man, whom he accused of conspiring with elements of U.S. intelligence to murder Kennedy in order to stop the latter’s efforts to end the Cold War. The accused was acquitted in 1969, but Garrison clung to his story, first writing A Heritage of Stone (Putnam, 1970) and eventually publishing On the Trail of the Assassins (Sheriden Square, 1988), one of the books that inspired Oliver Stone’s movie JFK.

The Kennedy assassination conspiracy was born-and it never died. According to another document, in April 1977 KGB chairman Yury Andropov informed the Politburo that the KGB was launching a new desinformatsiya campaign to further implicate “American special services” in the Kennedy assassination. Unfortunately, the Mitrokhin Archive is silent on the subject after that.

FP: You have discovered documents personally written by the assassin, Lee Harvey Oswald, suggesting that he was linked to the KGB’s department for assassination abroad, and that he had returned to the U.S. from the Soviet Union only temporarily, on a mission. Two federal investigations and over 2,500 books have looked into the assassination, but no one has raised this matter. How come?

Pacepa: Because no assassination investigators or researchers were sufficiently familiar with KGB operational codes and practices. The FBI recently told the U.S. Congress that only a native Arabic speaker could catch the fine points of an al-Qaida telephone intercept-especially one containing intelligence doubletalk. I spent 23 years of my other life speaking in such codes. Even my own identity was codified. In 1955, when I became a foreign intelligence officer, I was informed that from then on my name would be Mihai Podeanu, and Podeanu I remained until 1978, when I broke with communism. All my subordinates-and the rest of the Soviet bloc foreign intelligence officers-used codes in their written reports, when talking with their sources, and even in conversations with their own colleagues. When I left Romania for good, my espionage service was the “university,” the country’s leader was the “Architect,” Vienna was “Videle,” and so on.

In an interview published in the U.S., KGB general Boris Solomatin, a long-time deputy chief of the PGU (Soviet foreign intelligence), once stated: “I don’t make out of myself a man who knows everything in intelligence-as some former officers of the First Department [i.e., the PGU] who have written their books try to do. In intelligence and counterintelligence only the man who is heading these services knows everything. I am saying this because all the questions concerning ciphers and cipher machines were under another department-in a directorate outside of mine, similar to your National Security Agency.”[3]

During my last ten years in Romania I also managed the country’s equivalent of NSA, and I became familiar with the code systems used throughout the Soviet bloc intelligence community. This knowledge allowed me to realize that the innocuous-sounding letters from Oswald and his Soviet wife to the Soviet embassy in Washington, D.C. (made available to the Warren Commission) constituted veiled messages to the KGB. In them I found proof that Oswald was sent to the U.S. on a temporary mission, and that he planned to return to the inscrutable Soviet Union after accomplishing his task.

It took me many years to sift the wheat from the chaff in going through the piles of investigative reports generated by the violent death of the young American president, but when I finished I was fascinated by the wealth of KGB fingerprints all over the story of Oswald and his killer, Jack Ruby.
(more…)

17 marts 2007

Den nyttige idiot Frank Aaen var i Afghanistan og overværede afhøring af fanger

Senere kom han hjem og skrev om afhøringerne uden at tage afstand fra dem.

Ovenikøbet fører han også i forbindelse med Guldbrandsens film sig frem som moralens vogter (som altid).

Så kom jeg i tanker om dette om nyttige idioter:

“I have recently been reading the Mitrokhin Archive by Christopher Andrew and Vasili Mitrokhin. It is an analysis of the Papers that Vasili Mitrokhin, a KGB Archivist smuggled out of Russia and sheds light on many KGB operations over a number of years.In a passage describing the history of the KGB, I encountered this little gem. It seems that some things never change, sigh…

In the mid 1930s, many westerners felt compelled to visit the USSR to observe at first-hand the wonders of Socialism, where the myth-image of the world’s first peasant-worker state was so powerful that, for true believers, it even survived the contrary evidence of their own eyes.

Malcolm Muggeridge a British journalist in Moscow, later wrote of the British pilgrims he encountered.

“Their delight in all they saw and were told, and the expression they gave to that delight, constitute unquestionably one of the wonders of our age. There were earnest advocates of the humane killing of cattle who looked up at the massive headquarters of the OGPU [later the KGB] with tears of gratitude in their eyes, earnest advocates of proportional representation who eagerly assented when the necessity for the Dictatorship of the Proletariat was explained to them, earnest clergymen who reverently turned the pages of atheistic literature, earnest pacifists who watched delightedly as tanks rattle across red square and bombers darkened the sky, earnest town-planning specialists who stood outside ramshackle tenements and muttered; “If only we had something like this in England!”
The almost unbelievable credulity of these mostly university educated tourists astounded even Soviet officials used to handling foreign visitors…”.”

Det er også noget af en kovending Enhedslistemedlemmet Frank Aaen har gjort. I Sovjettiden gik han ind for kommunisternes fængslinger af islamiske mujahediner. Idag er Enhedslisten varme fortalere for islamister som HamaSS og HetZZbollah. Hvordan forklarer han det for partikammeraten Asmaa Abdol Hamid?