Hodjanernes Blog

28 juli 2015

Katastrofalt HØJE ismængder i Arktis

Filed under: Greenies — Tags: , , — Hodja @ 23:27

‘Klimaforskere’ må have hjælp fra isbryder i juli måned.

29 maj 2015

NASA: Isen på Polerne smelter ikke

Filed under: Greenies, Medier DR m.fl. — Tags: , , , — Hodja @ 16:09

Updated data from NASA satellite instruments reveal the Earth’s polar ice caps have not receded at all since the satellite instruments began measuring the ice caps in 1979.

Since the end of 2012, moreover, total polar ice extent has largely remained above the post-1979 average. The updated data contradict one of the most frequently asserted global warming claims – that global warming is causing the polar ice caps to recede.

[…]

Now, in May 2015, the updated NASA data show polar sea ice is approximately 5 percent above the post-1979 average.

Mere på Forbes

4 november 2014

Isbjørneforskning: Hvorfor har forskere tilbageholdt deres forskning for de sidste mere end 10 år?

What exactly are Western Hudson Bay (WHB) polar bear researchers hiding?

Since 2004, research on the body condition and cub production of Western Hudson Bay (WHB) polar bears has been carried out but none of the results of these mark-recapture studies have been made public. The researchers all claim that WHB polar bears are struggling to survive because of recent sea ice changes but won’t release the 10 years worth of updated information they possess on the bears or the sea ice.

Mere på Polar Bear Science

Frame-filling portrait of a young Polar Bear male jumping in the pack ice

1 september 2014

Kan du huske klimahystaden Al Gore ?

Filed under: TrumfEs — Tags: , , , — trumfes @ 16:44

For 7 år siden mente denne klovn at isen i arktis kunne være smeltet allerede i 2014 ?

Det er – selvfølgelig – gået lige omvendt. Siden 2007 er isen vokset …

Klimafup2

wpid-13883393974051

Taget herfra og herfra

9 september 2013

Ihh, hvor isen smelter i Arktis

Filed under: Godmenneske, Greenies, Journalister, Politisk korrekte, TrumfEs, Videnskab — Tags: , — trumfes @ 13:46

“The poles are smelting” som en vis Villy sagde det …

Virkeligheden er en anden. Mængden af is i Arktis går op og ned over tiden. Her kan du se at den faktisk er steget 60% i det sidste år:
1-3
Ikke nok med det. Mængden af is i Arktis en kun en lille del (ca 10%) af mængden af is på antarktis. Har du lagt mærke til at alle klimahystaderne kun snakker om arktis og næsten aldrig om antarktis ?
20110628_SnowWarming
Tror du det hænger sammen med at mængden af is på antarktis øges … ?
Taget herfra

30 august 2013

69% MERE is på Nordpolen end sidste år

Filed under: Evidens, Greenies, Videnskab — Tags: , , — Hodja @ 15:35

Se det her.

2 december 2012

Giv agt: Nye klimaløgne i sigte

Fredag den 30. november skriver metroXpress i en stor overskrift: “Al tvivl er væk: Isen smelter”

Overskriften baseres på en ny artikel i tidsskriftet Science, hvor 3 danske ‘forskere’ har deltaget. Avisen skriver “10 sattelitter, 47 videnskabsmænd og 19 års indsamling af data. Det var hvad der skulle slå fast, at isen smelter ved polerne.” Vidre skriver de: “I 2011 satte forskerne sig derfor sammen og blev enige om at måle og veje isen i fællesskab.”

Udover at den præstation at veje isen på Arktis, Grønland og Antarktis er en imponerende indsats, glemmer man at fortælle, at det ikke er ny forskning, man fremlægger, men at det drejer sig om en form for metaanalyse, som blot er en analyse af andres videnskabelige arbejder. Det siger sig selv, at det resultat, der kommer ud af en metaanalyse afhænger af, hvilke forskningsresultater, man vælger at inddrage. Forskerne kommer i øvrigt frem til at havene stiger 0,6 mm om året – dvs 6 cm på 100 år.

Hovedforfatteren til artiklen i Science siger i øvrigt:

Scientists note that current climate-change models predict that some parts of the Antarctic ice sheet will grow while other parts will shrink, and that parts of the Greenland ice also will melt. Observations have borne out these projections so far.

“The signals suggest there is no immediate threat” from rising sea levels, Prof. Shepherd said. “But we can at least warn people that there are instabilities that need to be investigated.”

Så drik lige et glas isvand til. Indenfor medicinsk forskning siger man i øvrigt, at hvis konklusionen på et videnskabeligt arbejde er, at der skal mere forskning til – hvorfor udgav forfatterne da i det hele taget dette studie?

Om metaanalyser:

The most severe weakness and abuse of meta-analysis often occurs when the person or persons doing the meta-analysis have an economic, social, or political agenda such as the passage or defeat of legislation. Those persons with these types of agenda have a high likelihood to abuse meta-analysis due to personal bias. For example, researchers favorable to the author’s agenda are likely to have their studies cherry picked while those not favorable will be ignored or labeled as “not credible”. In addition, the favored authors may themselves be biased or paid to produce results that support their overall political, social, or economic goals in ways such as selecting small favorable data sets and not incorporating larger unfavorable data sets.

Angående afsmeltning af havis:

Angående argumenter for og imod – se diskussionen under filmen på Youtube.

15 marts 2009

Isbjørneløgnen

The music is dramatic. The scene is tragic. The message emotional. Polar Bears, holding on for dear life to bits of ice, their artic habitat destroyed by Global Warming. And the narration tells you of the tragic fate of the bears, all because of man and his selfish destruction of the earth. Of course, the ad ends with a plea for funds to help the World Wildlife Fund (WWF) protect the bears and stop Global Warming. Cute, fuzzy animals always do the trick.

Trouble is, it’s all a lie. Not one word of the ad is true. Polar Bears are not endangered. There is no indication of any reduction of their populations. In fact, they are actually being hunted by locals who have to live with them in an effort to keep their populations down. Of 13 Polar Bear populations, 11 are thriving and growing.

The real agenda behind WWF’s Polar Bear campaign is to stop drilling of American oil and to shackle the United States with the UN’s Kyoto Climate Change Treaty. The policy is called Sustainable Development.

Using the Polar Bear, which WWF and the Sierra Club managed to get listed on the Endangered Species (ESA) list last year, the greens can grab control of the U.S. economy, controlling energy production.

The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service stimates that the polar bear population is currently at 20,000 to 25,000 bears, up from as low as 5,000-10,000 bears in the 1950s and 1960s.

A 2002 U.S. Geological Survey of wildlife in the Arctic Refuge Coastal Plain noted that the polar bear populations may now be near historic highs.

Læs her hvilke danskere der medvirker i spøgen. Bemærk isbjørnebillederne på den danske WWF’s hjemmeside!