Hodjanernes Blog

23 april 2017

Steve Milloy fra JunkScience slås videre med EPA (Enviroment Protection Agency) og NAS (National Academy of Sciences)

EPA og NAS prøver på at feje ham ind under gulvtæppet, men han har bidt sig fast.

Scare-Pollution-Cover-Final-122116-300x433Meget kort fortalt drejer det sig om, at EPA påstår, at luftforurening (PM2.5) er øjeblikkeligt dræbende, samtidig med at de har udført medicinske eksperimenter med luftforurening på lungesyge patienter og børn, efter de har informeret forsøgspersonerne om at det var ufarligt. Altså eksperimenter, der ifølge Nürnberlovene er uetiske og ulovlige. NAS har hvidvasket EPA.

Steve Milloy vil tvinge myndighederne til enten at indrømme, at luftforurening med partikler er ufarlig – eller at EPA principielt har udført menneskeeksperimenter etisk på linje med nazisternes forsøg på KZ-fanger. Der er kun de to muligheder.

Hvilken betydning har kampen? Det drejer sig om milliarder i forskningsbevillinger, afgifter og ødelagte industrier over hele verden. Kulindustrien, partikelfiltre på biler. Forbud mod brændeovne etc etc.

Det er forståeligt, at myndighederne kæmper med næb og kløer for at opretholde illusionen om, at luftforurening med partikler er livsfarlig.

Læs bogen – hele argumentationen er der – meget letforståeligt.

Følg med her.

23 september 2012

Biggest Announcement in JunkScience.com History Coming on Monday!

We will rock you. I promise.

Steve Milloy

Det har noget med klimaforskning at gøre 🙂

2 august 2017

Spermkvaliteten på rutschetur nedad

Filed under: Evidens, Læger, Medicin, Politik, Videnskab — Hodja @ 22:58

Skrev medierne i sidste uge.

Nej – det er et metastudie, og forfatteren Shanna Swan er aktivistisk anti-kemi forsker.

Junk-Science.

1 juli 2017

‘Forskere’ har forfalsket videnskabelige data om luftforurening i The New England Journal og Medicine

Epidemiologen J. Enstrom gennemhuller artikel der taler for strammere regulering af luftforurening.

“The authors have falsified their research findings.”

Nyt studie har analyseret mere end 2 millioner dødsfald i Californien i relation til luftforurening med PM2,5.

Konklusionen lyder:

In summary, our empirical evidence, supported by literature and logic, is that current levels of air quality, ozone and PM2.5, are not associated with or causally related to acute deaths for California. Our results, well summarized in Fig. 4 ;  Fig. 5, show no effect of ozone or PM2.5 at 12 μg/m3 or across all doses examined. There is no indication of any effect at low doses, for example. These results should be taken into account in any future revisions of the NAAQS for PM2.5 and O3.

ANTI-GREEN

Læs også: It’s unprecedented in the history of business — the largest U.S. oil company Exxon Mobil (XOM)  has been officially captured by anti-oil political activists.

BOOK REVIEW: ‘Scare Pollution’ a Pulitzer Prize-worthy Piece of Investigative Journalism

Most of the American public is unaware the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), with the help of the American Lung Association and radical environmental groups, has nearly succeeded in an attempted takeover of absolutely all industry in the United States. How could EPA accomplish such a grand scheme? By claiming exposure to particles in the air as small as 2.5 millionths of a meter can cause death in a matter of minutes, hours, or days.

It is called the PM2.5 rule, and the best scientific research shows these particles are ubiquitous and, contrary to EPA’s claims, are harmless.

11 juni 2017

Junk science i New England Journal of Medicine: Stress from Trump election to kill minorities

Boston, MA – Stress, increased risk for disease, babies born too early, and premature death are among the negative health impacts that could occur in the wake of the 2016 U.S. presidential election, according to a new article from Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health and Massachusetts General Hospital/McLean Hospital.

Marginalized groups are likely to be most affected, the authors said. That’s because hostile attitudes toward racial and ethnic minorities, immigrants, and Muslims–which appear to have been brought more to the surface with the presidential candidacy of Donald Trump–have been linked in previous studies with both mental and physical adverse health effects.

The article appears in the June 8, 2017 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine.

Videnskab er efterhånden noget, der hører fortiden til, alt bliver politiseret og kun få stiller spørgsmål til vrøvlet.

Her er flere eksempler på, at læger tror de har forstand på klimavidenskab:

Using words such as a “dangerous step backwards” and a “rejection of science-based decision-making,” a phalanx of medical societies is denouncing President Donald Trump’s decision on June 1 to withdraw from the Paris climate-change accord and pursue a new accord.

Trump’s rejection of the Paris Agreement met with swift disapproval from the Medical Society Consortium on Climate and Health (MSCCH), which consists of 12 associations. His decision “is the wrong choice that puts Americans at unnecessary risk,” said MSCCH Director, Mona Sarfaty, MD, MPH, in a news release. “Climate change is the greatest public health challenge of our time.”

MSCCH members are the ACP, the American Academy of Family Physicians; the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP); the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; the National Medical Association; the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma. and Immunology; the American College of Preventive Medicine; the American Podiatric Medical Association; the American Geriatrics Society; the Society of General Internal Medicine; the Academy of Integrative Health and Medicine; and the American Association of Community Psychiatrists.

og:

Climate change is a major threat to mental health, the American Psychiatric Association (APA), warns. The association has joined the growing ranks of physician groups that are sounding the alarm about the multifactorial effects that rising seas, temperature extremes, and changing environments are having on individuals’ physical and mental health.

In a new position statement, the APA focuses on the profound impact of climate change on mental health, which may include the development or exacerbation of mental illnesses such as anxiety, depression, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), or substance abuse.

Det danske Ugeskrift for Læger abonnerer også på klima pseudovidenskaben.

23 april 2017

Trump dræber syrere med CO2

The Other Poison Gas Killing Syrians: Carbon Dioxide Emissions

MORONS

If Trump and his cronies really cared about children killed by noxious gases, they wouldn’t be trying to spew ever more CO2 into the atmosphere.

CO2 is a deadly greenhouse gas that turned Venus into a torrid hellhole hot enough to melt lead.”

Mere gak-gak her. Via Junk-Science.

10 april 2017

The EPA Lied — Nobody Died

The EPA human experiments controversy is now over.

As between choosing whether EPA committed multiple felonies vs. lying to the Congress/public about PM2.5 killing people, the National Academy of Sciences has chosen the “lying’ option. Total victory achieved.

A controversy that first appeared in these pages five years ago, came to an end last week. The National Academy of Sciences (NAS) concluded that human experiments with air pollutants conducted by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) were not dangerous — meaning EPA has been lying to the public and Congress for years about the extreme danger of the “pollutants” in question.

[…]

So when the first Obama EPA administrator, Lisa Jackson, testified to Congress that “Particulate matter causes premature death. It does not make you sick. It is directly causal to dying sooner than you should,” that was a lie, one compounded by her next false claim that particulate matter kills about 570,000 Americans per year.

[…]

As it turns out, the only time EPA told the truth about particulate matter was when it told its human guinea pigs that the experiments were harmless. Meanwhile the Obama EPA used the phony killer particulate matter scare — backed by almost $600 million in utterly fraudulent scientific research and fueled with secret scientific data — to virtually wipe out the U.S. coal industry, severely harming coal miners, their families and their communities.

Mere på Junk Science

Hvad siger danske miljømyndigheder? Ingenting! De vil fortsætte med at lade som om PM2.5 er sundhedsskadeligt og indføre alskens begrænsninger på danskerne.

5 april 2017

Ny forskning om luftforurening

Filed under: Almindelig fornuft, Evidens, Medicin, USA/Canada, Videnskab — Tags: , — Hodja @ 17:17

Udendørs luft er farligere end tobaksrygning!

Og en mindre mængde af luftforurening er farligere end en større mængde.

Fra JunkScienceJunkScience:

The National Academy of Sciences was hired by the EPA to whitewash the agency’s program of illegal human experiments. And it did. But in doing so it vindicated the basic point about EPA — the agency lied to the public about the alleged dangers of PM2.5.

21 marts 2017

Epidemiologiske studier over luftforurening er utroværdige

LUFTFORURENING

Læs mere på Junk Science og læs Steve Milloys bog “Scare pollution” – den kan anbefales.

Som jeg så ofte har skrevet: epidemiologi er statistik, der intet sikkert siger om årsager, det fatter journalister ikke.

Læs mere om The Secret Science Reform Act, der kan vende hele forskningen om luftforurening på hovedet.

Aktivister overdriver skader på Great Barrier Reef

The chairman of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Russell Reichelt says that activist groups are distorting surveys, maps and data to exaggerate the coral bleaching on the reef.

The bleaching affects 22% of the reef and is mostly localized to the far northern section, which has good prospects of recovery.

Two reef groups are in conflict. One is Reichelt’s GBR Authority, and the other is a special “National Coral Bleaching Taskforce” run by a guy called Terry Hughes. The Australian media was overrun with stories last week about how a report was censored to hide the damage. What was under-reported was the conflict and the propaganda.

The real problem appears to be that yet another agency was set up to find a crisis, and their existence depends on finding one. The Taskforce was set up in October last year.

We have the largest coral reef structure in the world, but sometimes the ABC can’t find a picture of bleaching from it, instead using an image from Samoa (top right). Greenpeace used the same trick.

Læs mere om svindelen her

Oops… ‘scientists’ overlooked effect of ‘dead zones’ on coral reefs. Not global warming. Not ocean acidification.

24 februar 2017

Interview med Steve Milloy forfatter til ‘Scare Pollution’

EPA er USA’s superaktivistiske miljøagentur Environmental Protection Agency.

EPA står bag junk forskning i bl.a. luftforurening, som er medvirkend51lat5pxpfl-_sx322_bo1204203200_e til enorme unødvendige udgifter for den vestlige verden.

Steve Milloy har stillet myndighederne i USA overfor et kæmpe dilemma. EPA går officielt ud og siger (EPA administrator Lisa Jackson som vidnede overfor en underkommitte fra House Energy and Commerce Committee 22. september 2011):

“Particulate matter causes premature death. It doesen’t make you sick. It’s directly causal to dying sooner than you should”

Samtidig har Milloy med ihærdigt arbejde gennem flere år påvist, hvordan EPA har fået gennemført illegale forsøg på mennesker (inklusive børn) med udsættelse for meget store doser luftforurening uden at informere forsøgspersonerne om risikoen for bl.a. at dø.

Så systemet har kun 2 muligheder: ENTEN er luftforurening ikke så farlig, som EPA påstår (hvilket er Milloys egentlige ærinde), og så kan myndighederne ikke regulere ‘luftforurening så rigidt, som de gør, ELLER EPA og adskillige amerikanske universiteter (som modtager i 100-vis af millioner dollar fra EPA til forskning) har overtrådt alle medicinske etiske regler for menneskeforsøg, som er blevet indført efter ‘Lægeprocessen’ ved Nürnbergdomstolen efter 2. Verdenskrig. Hertil kommer de læger som har udført forsøgene og de videnskabelige tidsskrifter, der har udgivet dem.

Der findes ikke andre muligheder.

Der er selvfølgelig ingen i Danmark, der har refereret sagen, som naturligvis også har betydning for dansk miljøforskning og -lovgivning. Man er for eksempel i gang med tiltag, der skal lægge afgifter på alle brændeovne i landet, og måske på længere sigt forbyde dem.

Mere om JunkScience

Congress is reading ‘Scare Pollution’… are you?

31 august 2016

DEBUNKED: Top 5 “Climate Change” Myths

Debunking the top 5 Climate Change myths and defining what it really means to be a “Climate science denier”.

References at http://louderwithcrowder.com/top-5-cl…

U.S. College Professors Tell Students: ‘Climate Skeptics Verboten!’

Donald Trumps Green Wall

3 juli 2016

De amerikanske miljømyndigheder EPA frikender Roundup

Men trækker rapporten tilbage efter krav fra konspirationsteoretiske aktivister.

ROUNDUP

Mere på Junk Science

15 marts 2016

Klimaforsker arresteret for svindel

Filed under: Greenies, Klima, Politik, Videnskab — Tags: — Hodja @ 14:14

Screen-Shot-2016-03-14-at-5.32.32-PM

Fra Junk Science

1 februar 2016

Millioner af menneskeliv gået tabt på grund af politisk korrekthed

“To only a few chemicals does man owe as great a debt as to DDT…

In little more than two decades, DDT has prevented 500 million human deaths, due to malaria, that otherwise would have been inevitable.”

100 Things You Should Know About DDT

The battle has abruptly become more pressing by what the World Health Organization has called the “explosive” spread of the mosquito-borne Zika virus through Brazil and other parts of Latin America.

One old method that is not getting serious attention would be to use DDT, a powerful pesticide that is banned in many countries because of the ecological damage documented in the 1962 book “Silent Spring.” Still, it is being mentioned a bit, and some experts defend its use for disease control.

“That concern about DDT has to be reconsidered in the public health context,” said Dr. Lyle R. Petersen, director of the division of vector-borne diseases at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Mere på New York Times

27 oktober 2015

Ny fødevareskræmmekampagne: Forarbejdet kød påstås at medføre cancer

Filed under: Evidens, Journalister, Læger, Medicin, Medier DR m.fl. — Hodja @ 22:25

Challenge: Not a single epidemiological study credibly links meat-eating with cancer

Don’t believe me? Show me one. I’ll debunk it before your eyes.

Consider this excerpt from a November 2007 column I wrote for FOXNews.com about a report from the American Institute for Cancer Research claiming that processed meat caused cancer.

Consider the data presented for processed meat, which the AICR report claims to be too dangerous to eat.

Of the 17 study results concerning processed meat and colon cancer comparing high consumption to low consumption 15 are way below, and one is at the 100 percent-risk threshold. Thirteen studies aren’t statistically significant. Not only is the lone study claiming a risk above 100 percent (a reported 250 percent increase in risk) barely statistically significant, it has a margin of error four times the size of the reported risk.

Of the seven studies reporting a cancer risk per serving of processed meat, all reported risks are substantially below the 100 percent threshold. Four results are clearly not statistically significant and two are borderline insignificant.

On the basis of these dubious statistical results, the AICR report concludes that “processed meat is a convincing cause of colorectal cancer.” This is an appalling and unsupported conclusion.

Nothing has changed since this column,except perhaps that more junky studies have been published.

Læs resten på junk Science, læs også kommentarerne, der er nogle interessante udregninger i komentarerne!

18 oktober 2014

6 grunde til at panikke over ebola

As a rule, one should not panic at whatever crisis has momentarily fixed the attention of cable news producers.

But the Ebola outbreak in West Africa, which has migrated to both Europe and America, may be the exception that proves the rule. There are at least six reasons that a controlled, informed panic might be in order.

Skal vi lukke grænserne?

As the Ebola crisis surges to the top issue on the minds of Americans, a new poll finds that 82 percent of those following the issue closely want to quarantine anybody who has recently traveled to the virus-stricken nations.

The Economist/YouGov poll found that women are more concerned than men and would refuse entry to anybody from those nations. Just 16 percent would allow them into the nation.

The poll is the latest proof that the nation is in an Ebola frenzy that believes Washington and President Obama have fallen down on their job of protecting Americans. For the first time in two months of polling on the issue, more Americans disapprove of the president’s handling of the issue than approve.

But the headline is support for banning or quarantining those who have been in the Ebola countries. That is a far more hardline view than limiting or ending flights from the countries, of which there are few.

— 72 percent of all polled believe “we should quarantine people who have recently been in any of the countries in western Africa where there is a major Ebola outbreak.”

— 82 percent of those following the issue very closely want a quarantine

— 56 percent said the federal government should bar those who have “recently” been in Ebola nations from entering the U.S. It rises to 66 percent for those following the issue closely.

Imens øger HusseinObama importen af potentielle smittebærere.

According to the Washington Post, the number of visas issued to Liberians by the United States has spiked, with about 3,500 visitor visas granted to Liberians last year, and another 10,000 granted to people from Guinea and Sierra Leone during that same time period. The Post also reported that Liberians also have a very high rate of “visa overstays.”

Og vi skal bruge billioner af kroner på imaginære trusler, men hvor meget bliver der brugt på en særdeles realistisk fare, hvor der hverken findes vaccine eller medicinsk behandling.

9 oktober 2014

LEGO har rygrad som en regnorm

Lego har i dag meddelt, at legetøjsgiganten ikke vil forlænge det samarbejde med Shell, som har kørt i de sidste par år.

Beslutningen kommer efter en kampagne som Greenpeace har ført mod Lego – med det formål at ramme Shell.

This isn’t the first time Lego bowed to Greenpeas pressure.  Maybe they hope Greenpeas won’t notice that Lego bricks are made of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene terpoloymers and is rather connected to the petrochemical industry. A company is not allowing a petrochemical company to hand out set of toys made from petrochemicals? This has got to be the most ironic situation I have seen in a long time. Let’s see how far Greenpeace would get without any oil for their ships, planes, and cars. No less the medications, clothes, food and many other items used in daily life, even in Europe. Maybe it is time to put them all on an island for a true low impact resistance.

Mere på Junk Science

Se dette interview med Greenpeace’s grundlægger Patrick Moore – han river dem totalt fra hinanden. Interviewet er fyldt med guldkorn. Alene denne: “Greenpeace vil forbyde halvdelen af det Periodisk System”. Og – Greenpeace vil ikke diskutere med ham – for de har ingen modargumenter.

Spring evt over de første 11 minutter.

27 september 2013

I anledning af at eventyret IPCC’s klimarapport er udkommet i dag

Varmisterne leder febrilsk efter forklaringer på den manglende opvarmning.

CO2 medfører opvarmning af Verdenshavene, der koncentrerer energien op og derefter forsvinder i ‘sorte huller’.

Sidst skyldtes den manglende havvandstigning unaturligt store mængder nedbør i Australiens ørkner, som sugede alt vandet til sig som en stor svamp.

Det næste bliver, at politikere, forskere og medier vil forklare det med, at deres tiltag virker. De vil aldrig indrømme, at de har skræmt befolkningerne fra vid og sans, samtidig med, at de har kostet os enorme summer i fuldstændig unødvendige miljøafgifter, energiomlægninger osv.

The problem is that numerous IPCC personnel have ties to environmental groups, many of which raise funds by hyping the alleged dangers of climate change. This relationship raises a legitimate question about their objectivity.

11 maj 2013

Ny CO2-rekord sender jorden mod forhistorisk klima – skriver DanMarx Radio

For første gang i menneskehedens historie er der blevet målt 400 CO2-molekyler per million molekyler luft (i én måling på toppen af en aktiv vulkan) på Hawaii.

Skriver de – dog uden at nævne det med vulkanen, det har jeg tilføjet  – og så fortsætter de med det sædvanlige alarm – alarm. Hvorfor skriver de ikke ændringen i % af atmosfæren? Fordi ‘millioner af molekyler’ får de uvidene til at få skrækvisioner! Det, tallet betyder, er, at CO2 indholdet i atmosfæren, der er på 0,038 % i en enkelt måling er målt til 0,04%. Og målingen ser ud til at være snyd: Den er fremkommet ved at manipulere med tidszoner.

De skriver envidere: “Jorden har ikke oplevet så højt et niveau i tre til fem millioner år, længe før mennesket eksisterede.”  New York Times skriver: The best available evidence suggest…”

Og det hele hænger garanteret ikke sammen med, at forberedelserne til COP-19 netop er gået i gang?

Jeg kom i tanke om en post, jeg skrev i 2006, hvor der stod:

Appearing before the Commons Committee on Environment and Sustainable Development last year, Carleton University paleoclimatologist Professor Tim Patterson testified, “There is no meaningful correlation between CO2 levels and Earth’s temperature over this [geologic] time frame. In fact, when CO2 levels were over ten times higher than they are now, about 450 million years ago, the planet was in the depths of the absolute coldest period in the last half billion years.” Patterson asked the committee, “On the basis of this evidence, how could anyone still believe that the recent relatively small increase in CO2 levels would be the major cause of the past century’s modest warming?”

Patterson concluded his testimony by explaining what his research and “hundreds of other studies” reveal: on all time scales, there is very good correlation between Earth’s temperature and natural celestial phenomena such changes in the brightness of the Sun.

Older Posts »