This is the leaflet that is handed out to migrants in Sicily by the NGO Oxfam.
Let’s have a look at it. It is called OpenEurope guide to rights.
This is handed out to migrants while Oxfam workers and translators speak to them to help them settle in their new country and seek asylum in the easiest way possible.
Jihad Watch director Robert Spencer appeared on Tucker Carlson’s show on Fox to discuss Jihad Watch’s banning from PayPal, the Southern Poverty Law Center’s spurious “hate group” listing, and the Left’s war against the freedom of speech.
Foreningen Kræv Licensmoms Tilbage er stiftet hos DLA Piper Denmark med henblik på at få moms af licensbetalingen tilbagebetalt fra Danmarks Radio.
Alle, som har betalt licens, kan tilmelde sig Foreningen!
Flere momseksperter har vurderet, at det er muligt at få momsen af licensen tilbagebetalt, og derfor rejser Foreningen nu krav om tilbagebetaling af moms overfor Danmarks Radio. Skatteeksperterne Thomas Booker og Peter Lunau Larsen, DLA Piper Denmark, er enige i vurderingen. Du kan se DLA Piper Denmarks vurdering af sagen her.
Foreningen har derfor den 22. august 2017 fremsat krav overfor Danmarks Radio om tilbagebetaling af den ulovligt opkrævede moms og ansøgt Civilstyrelsen om fri proces til sagens forberedelse.
100 kr.
Det koster 100 kr. at tilmelde sig til Foreningen, og tilmeldingsgebyret dækker alle dine omkostninger.
Tilbagebetalingskravet for hver licensbetaler udgør for perioden 2015 og frem 1.486 kr. + renter, når du har betalt fuld licens.
DLA Piper Denmark fører sagen for Foreningen og varetager alt arbejdet i forbindelse med kravet. Når du tilmelder dig Foreningen Kræv Licensmoms Tilbage, kan du dermed være sikker på ikke at få yderligere omkostninger, uanset hvordan sagen udvikler sig.
For tilmeldingsgebyret rejser DLA Piper Denmark dermed dit krav over for Danmarks Radio og fører retssag herom på vegne af alle Foreningens medlemmer.
MSM elsker at portrætere Trump i et dårligt lys : Trump vender 180 grader , etc, etc
Men kun meget sjældent får folk en beskrivelse af hvad og hvorfor
her er en video, der belyser det:
MSM fake-news synes i øvrigt at aldrig at overveje at en intelligent leder kan skifte mening og ændre sin holdning
Så kan man så være enig med Trumps forrige politik ( ud af Afghanistan) eller den nuværende ( vi kan ikke acceptere et vacuum i Afghanistan)
Jeg har et lidt ambivalent forhold til den nye politik:
På den en side kan jeg godt forstå at USA ikke ønsker et nyt vacuum som det i Irak, der tillod ISIS at erobre store omåder
På den anden side har jeg ingen som helst tiltro til aftaler med Taliban, ISIS eller andre muslimske terrororganistioner – de aftaler vil ikke være det papir værd, de er skrevet på og højst ligne den aftale, som USA indgik med Nordvietnam, og som Nordvietnam blæste på nogle år senere
To summarize, the indictment is an exercise in omission.
No mention of the Awan group’s theft of information from Congress. Not a hint about the astronomical sums the family was paid, much of it for no-show “work.” Not a word about Wasserman Schultz’s keeping Awan on the payroll for six months during which (a) he was known to be under investigation, (b) his wife was known to have fled to Pakistan, and (c) he was not credentialed to do the IT work for which he had been hired. Nothing about Wasserman Schultz’s energetic efforts to prevent investigators from examining Awan’s laptop. A likely currency-transportation offense against Alvi goes uncharged. And, as for the offenses that are charged, prosecutors plead them in a manner that avoids any reference to what should be their best evidence.
Journalist Anne Mette Steen-Andersen skriver i Dagens Medicin 18-8-2017:
Begrebet ‘det postfaktuelle samfund’ er de senere år hyppigst blevet brugt til at beskrive udviklinger og tendenser inden for politik. Bedst eksemplificeret ved USA’s nye præsident Donald Trumps lemfældige omgang med sandheden og medierne. Det engelske nyhedsmagasin The Economist skrev sidste efterår en række artikler om det postfaktuelle samfund. Heri blev begrebet beskrevet således: »Sandheden er ikke forfalsket eller anfægtet, men den er af sekundær betydning.« I et sådant samfund skal politiske løgne ikke generere falske verdensbilleder, men har derimod til formål at forstærke fordomme og skabe polariseringer i samfundet: En ‘os-versus-dem’ tankegang, hvor der slås på følelser frem for fakta.
Det postfaktuelle sniger sig ind allevegne – også i Dagens medicin!
Labour MP and key Corbyn ally shares Twitter message telling Rotherham sex abuse victims to ‘shut their mouths for the good of diversity’ – just days after attacking a fellow party member for speaking out over the issue
Labour MP Naz Shah shared Twitter post telling sex abuse victims to shut up
It came days after she attacked fellow MP for speaking out on Rotheram scandal
Ms Shah’s spokesman later said the Twitter incident was a ‘genuine mistake’
She was previously suspended from Labour for making anti-semitic comments
Naz Shah, who represents Bradford West, shared and liked the post by a parody account of newspaper columnist Owen Jones.
It said: ‘Those abused girls in Rotherham and elsewhere just need to shut their mouths. For the good of diversity.’
Were you shocked by Naz Shah’s outbursts on social media? Were you baffled that an aspiring MP would call to “relocate” (that is, destroy and deport) Israel to America? Did you baulk, wondering why on earth a self-respecting politician would ask supporters to vote in an online poll because “the Jews are rallying”?
Don’t be. Because Naz Shah, and everything she said, is normal politics in Bradford.
Valerie Plame Wilson is fundraising to buy a controlling share of Twitter so that she can ban President Trump from the social media platform.
“From emboldening white supremacists to promoting violence against journalists, his tweets damage the country and put people in harm’s way,” Wilson wrote on her GoFundMe page. “But threatening actual nuclear war with North Korea takes it to a dangerous new level.”
A great public clamor was then created: did Bush “out” Valerie Plame as a secret CIA agent? Did he do so to punish her for her husband’s (politically-motivated) statements about the Yellow Cake? The answer to these questions is, no, Bush did no such thing. It was just another false controversy manufactured by the Democratic Party who views all political opponents as mortal enemies to be destroyed, by any means possible.