Hodjanernes Blog

17 juli 2017

Klimareligionen for retten

Filed under: Økofascisme, Eksperter, Greenies, IPCC, Istid, Jura, Klima, Politik, Videnskab — Hodja @ 15:08

A little-known court case is taking place in the Supreme Court of British Columbia in Vancouver.

This case involves two scientists and two set of graphs. One of the graphs is very famous, and the basis for every man-made climate change believer’s faith, while the other…is not.

Michael Mann is a climatologist and geophysicist working at Penn State University. In 1998, he was the leader of a group using statistical techniques that created a graph showing the earth’s temperature over the last 1,000 years. The graph would gain international fame and become known as the “hockey stick graph.”

The worldwide climate change industry is valued to be worth $1.5 trillion. That’s a lot of money for “research.” Enter Dr. Timothy Ball.

Dr. Ball has a PhD in climatology from Queen Mary University of London, and was a professor at the University of Winnipeg. He is an avid critic of the man-made climate change theory. It is not that he does not believe in climate change, but he does not believe humans are having the impact the church of man-made climate change says they are.

Dr. Ball also created his own version of the “hockey stick graph,” but it looked nothing like Mann’s. Ball’s graph shows what is known as the Medieval Warm Period.

Dr. Ball is enemy number one for the church of man-made climate change. One article he wrote made light of the connection between Mann and the Climatic Research Unit email controversy. Mann did not take to kindly to the slight, and decided to sue for libel.

Dr. Ball did not lay down and instead decided to fight the case. The case was filled in Canada and known as a Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation suit. It was filed six years ago, and is going sideways for Mann. The judge in the case has ordered all data used to make both graphs be handed over by all parties. Dr. Ball has cooperated, but Mann has not.

Dr. Ball recently stated, “We believe he [Mann] withheld on the basis of a U.S. court ruling that it was all his intellectual property. This ruling was made despite the fact the U.S. taxpayer paid for the research and the research results were used as the basis of literally earth-shattering policies on energy and environment. The problem for him is that the Canadian court holds that you cannot withhold documents that are central to your charge of defamation regardless of the U.S. ruling.”

John O’Sullivan reports on the punishment that Dr. Ball’s lawyers could ask for if Mann is found to be in contempt, “Ball is entitled to have the court serve upon Mann the fullest punishment. Contempt sanctions could reasonably include the judge ruling that Dr. Ball’s statement that Mann “belongs in the state pen, not Penn. State’ is a precise and true statement of fact. This is because under Canada’s unique ‘Truth Defense’, Mann is now proven to have willfully hidden his data, so the court may rule he hid it because it is fake. As such, the court must then dismiss Mann’s entire libel suit with costs awarded to Ball and his team.”

If this holds true, then the basis of the entire Paris climate agreement, IPCC, and every climate change agreement is in jeopardy. If it was all formed from faulty data, it is all at risk. The hockey stick graph is responsible for hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars being spent around the world, and hundreds of job-killing regulations being enacted on the American worker. It is time we find out if it was all fake.

Læs hele artiklen her.

Læs også: Verdenshistoriens største økononomiske svindelnummer.

Prager University kurerer vor fatteevne.

Filed under: det offentlige, Politik, Prager University — husmanden @ 14:54

Når man er syg, fungerer hjernen ofte bedre, end når man er rask.

Det har jeg som så mange måttet sande.  Klage over behandlingen i det syge system? Tør man overhovedet? – for hvem behandler klagen?  Som med alle systemer er problemet systemet.  Ikke de ansatte – de er bare mennesker som alle andre.

SIAD demonstration ved Ayasofya moskéen i Roskilde d. 15/7 2017

SIAD (Stop Islamiseringen af Danmark) afholdte i dag en demonstration foran moskéen i Allehelgensgade i Roskilde.

Demonstrationen skyldes at byrådet i Roskilde har givet tilladelse til at der må bygges minareter på den nybyggede moské – noget der ellers kun er givet tilladelse til på de 2 stormoskéer i København, og i det hele taget ikke hører til i Danmark. Samtidigt gjorde SIAD demonstrationen der klart, at man mente at det blot var et spørgsmål om tid, før der gives tilladelser til at indkalde til bøn fra minareterne. Anders Gravers Pedersen fra SIAD havde i dagens anledning inviteret Rasmus Paludan til at holde en tale, hvor Paludan ville tale om truslen fra Islam og Stram Kurs – en nyt politisk parti der lanceres i næste uge med Rasmus Paludan i spidsen. Derudover fortalte Anders Gravers selv hvad grundlaget for demonstrationen var, og hvordan SIAD ville blive ved med at lægge pres på politikerne, for at få dem til at stoppe deres leflen for muslimerne, og i det hele taget at stoppe islamiseringen af Danmark.

Demonstrationen forløb fredeligt og roligt, og tog lidt mere end en times tid. Fremmødet var ca. 100 personer, hvilket fyldte godt op i den smalle gade i Roskilde. Udover moddemonstrationen afholdt af Mennesker for Mangfoldighed, som SIAD demonstrationen ikke så noget til, så mødte alt-i-alt 8-10 af de venstreradikale personer fra København op til SIAD demonstrationen, og selvom de ankom enkeltvis eller 2 sammen, og endda fik en gennemkørende bus til at sætte en gruppe på 4 af dem af midt i SIAD demonstrationen, så fik politiet hurtigt ført de sørgelige og destruktive elementer væk. På vej væk fra demonstrationen blev en mindre gruppe af deltagerne i SIAD demonstrationen forfulgt af en sortklædt ung mand på cykel, som konstant havde gang i telefonen. Der skete dog ikke yderligere, selvom manden på cykel fulgte SIAD deltagerne helt til Roskildes bygrænse.