Hodjanernes Blog

30 januar 2017


Filed under: Donald Trump, Hykleri, Politik, USA Valg, USA/Canada, Venstrefløjen — Hodja @ 23:28

Rebel Media ved gerningsstedet i Quebec

Filed under: Kriminalitet, Medier DR m.fl., Mord, USA/Canada, Vold — Hodja @ 23:23


Venstrefløjens selvretfærdighed vil fortsætte med at terrorisere os i det uendelige

Pop star Madonna let everyone know that in the era of Donald Trump she’s choosing love over hate—though the decision was apparently very difficult.

madonna1Speaking at the Women’s March on Washington, the aging “material girl” mentioned that she’d spent a lot of time wallowing in thoughts of blowing up the White House. Thankfully she decided against it though not because she had any moral qualms about terrorism. It’s just that, according to her, blowing up the White House “won’t change anything.” It’s good to know that Madonna opposes killing the First Family and a slew of incoming staffers for purely tactical reasons.

It occurs to me that Madonna was doing nothing more than virtue signaling—that is, demonstrating what a good person she is without doing much of anything. She wants a pat on the back for not succumbing to political terrorism as an outlet for her rage. If that’s not a testament to her loving nature, what is?

This is the same woman who produced a music video on the eve of the Iraq War in which she tossed a hand grenade at a George W. Bush look-alike. After filming, she decided not to release that video for fear that it might be misconstrued as anti-military. But can you see the pattern? Whenever someone Madonna doesn’t like occupies the Oval Office she indulges her darkest assassination fantasies.

Madonna’s speech, just like the march itself, relied heavily on the theme of love conquering hate. She began by shouting “Welcome to the revolution of love!” to the adoring audience. The crowd responded with about as many hoots and hollers as when she admitted her terrorism fantasies several minutes later. She ended her speech by leading the crowd in chanting “We choose love.” This basic dichotomy of love on one side—their side—and hate on the other, has become so hackneyed that I can hardly believe that people still use it; but they do. Like a one-trick pony, the American Left reaches for different variations on this dummy-proof bumper sticker slogan over and over again, usually to the exclusion of reasoned argument.


The reason this love-versus-hate juxtaposition is so often employed is because it’s effective. Why learn another trick when the old one works so well? Politics is a propaganda war and we conservatives have been on the losing side of it for a long time because we don’t see it for what it is. A well-framed, emotionally-charged slogan does more to persuade than a million think tank white papers. That’s just reality. The intellect matters less than the heart—and the gut matters most of all.

Far too often, conservatives’ ineffectual response to the love-versus-hate formulation is to point out that the other side is pretty hateful too. Which it is, of course, though I would caution against drawing any equivalence. While the Left is clearly nastier, they are also shameless which means that no amount of highlighting their vitriol ever makes them blush.

Even in Madonna’s speech, the one she kicked off by welcoming the protestors to the “revolution of love,” she still said “F–k you” to her detractors. And the crowd roared. But that’s different, you see, because Madonna was merely hating on haters. As the hack journalist Jonathan Capehart once said on MSNBC, tolerance “should not be a two-way street.”

And clearly it isn’t. On the same day Madonna spoke, across the country in the other Washington, a Trump opponent shot a man in the stomach outside of a Milo Yiannopoulos event, mistakenly believing him to the Trump supporter and a white supremacist. In reality, the victim was a Bernie Sanders supporter.

… Can’t you just feel the love?

‘Isolated incident!’ the Left shouts. Well no, not really. Episodes like these are beginning to feel like Groundhog Day, only less funny. The scene in Washington State wasn’t quite so different than the one in Washington, DC. On Inauguration Day in the nation’s capital 217 leftist “protestors” were arrested and six police officers were injured, in addition to lots of smashed windows and a few scattered fires. The AP report labeled all counter-Trump voices at the event “protestors,” even those who were clearly engaged in wanton destruction. Other media reports were quick to point out that the so-called protests were “mostly peaceful,” a throwaway line that reporters like to include whenever people on the Left engage in mayhem, lest anyone draw broad generalizations. Left-wing riots aren’t really riots, you see, unless it can be proven that every person in attendance took part. The old “mostly peaceful” canard is never used when the protestors are conservative. When conservative protests are entirely peaceful, the media focus instead on what potential violence might happen in the future or on the protestors’ “tone.”

It seems that there are so many “isolated incidents” of leftist mayhem that we should stop seeing each one in a vacuum. For those with eyes to see there is a clear pattern. Leftists convince us to ignore the pattern by accusing us of judging the “protestors” by a few supposed bad apples. Funny how many bad apples seem show up at anti-Trump rallies all across the country, just as they showed up at Black Lives Matter events, Occupy events, anti-Iraq War events, anti-WTO events, and wherever else two or more leftists scheme.

What happened in DC was not a peaceful protest gone wrong. It was a pre-meditated riot gone right. Responsible journalists should stop talking about it as if it were anything else.

Of course, not everyone in attendance necessarily got the memo that the whole thing was slated to be an orgy of destruction, though they would have to have been naïve not to foresee what eventually happened. An organized coalition promised that they would wreak so much havoc that DC would be shut down. Does that mean that every protestor who attended was part of this coalition? No, though they would have been treated that way if it had been conservatives crashing a hypothetical Hillary inauguration. Even still, anyone who attended the Washington riot and pretends that he thought he was taking part in a nonviolent protest is either lying or stupid.

Yet no matter how many times we point out that there is just as much hate on their side—if not more—they brush it off. In their minds, their hate is not hate because they only hate people who deserve it. Never for a moment do these people lose faith in their own goodness. They don’t doubt that they are the most benevolent, the most open-minded, and the most accepting of all people; in other words, that they are liberals in the truest and finest sense of the word. If they occasionally fantasize about killing the president that’s not really hate because a) they don’t actually follow through with it, and b) the president kind of deserves it.

My hope is that some day the scales will fall from their eyes and they will see what grotesque monsters they have become. It’s a long shot, I know, but it may be our only chance for survival. As long as the Left remains self-righteousness, it will continue to terrorize the rest of us. If only we could strip them of their unshakeable conviction that they are the good guys they might start to see what demented psychos they have become. This is will be no easy task, of course, because most leftists have dehumanized their opponents so thoroughly that they don’t see hating them as a fault. It isn’t even hate. …

Skriver Benny Huang via No-Pasaran: https://no-pasaran.blogspot.dk/2017/01/isolated-incident-violent-episodes-from.html

Rebel Media om terroren i Quebec

Filed under: Kriminalitet, Mord, Moske, Minaret, Terror i Danmark, USA/Canada, Vold — Hodja @ 20:40

What’s really going on at the mosque in Quebec City?

Last night, two armed gunmen burst in, killing 6 and wounding 19 more. It was a horrendous attack that must be condemned.

And immediately it was. But within minutes, before any facts were in, the mainstream media had already made up their mind about what happened: it was “Islamophobia”. Some journalists — and even a Muslim Quebec politician — said that Donald Trump was to blame.

But an eyewitness at the mosque said one of the gunmen shouted “Allah Akbar”. That’s what a Muslim terrorist says, not an “Islamophobe”.

At their press conference this morning, Quebec police refused to name the two suspects taken into custody last night. Why?

But the names leaked out anyways: Alexandre Bissonnette — and a Muslim named Mohamed Khadir, who was later called a “witness” by police.

What’s going on here — did a Muslim attack a mosque? And who is Bissonnette — a friend of Khadir? A convert to Islam? Or an anti-Muslim murderer?

What are the facts? And can we trust the mainstream media to tell us the truth?

I don’t know the answers. But I know this for sure: we won’t get the whole story from the CBC, or the rest of the mainstream media. They’re less concerned about straight reporting, and more concerned with protecting the official narrative — Muslims are victims, not terrorists; Canadians are racists; anyone worried about radical Islam is a bigot.

You could practically hear their disappointment to learn that one of the men arrested last night is named Mohamed.

Well, we don’t know all the facts yet either. But unlike the CBC, we intend to uncover the truth, not bury it.

So this morning, our own Faith Goldy went to Quebec City with our cameraman Alex — as I write this e-mail, they on her way to the crime scene. She’ll ask real questions, and follow the facts wherever they lead.

We’ve set up a special website for all of Faith’s reports from Quebec — click here or visit http://www.QuebecTerror.com. Make sure you go there for the other side of the story, especially if you’re getting your news from the Trudeau propagandists at the CBC.

Booking a flight for Faith and Alex on short notice cost us $1,276. And two hotel rooms, for two nights, was another $560. Add in cab fare and some meals, and we’ll be close to $2,000. If you can help us crowdfund the costs of this trip, please do — by clicking here, or visiting http://www.QuebecTerror.com.

Thanks for your support.

Yours truly,

Ezra Levant

P.S. This is a very important story, and it will be covered extensively by the CBC — in fact, Faith told me that Peter Mansbridge, and his whole luxury entourage, were on the same flight to Quebec City as her.

You can see why: the CBC is already working hard to downplay the fact that at least one of the arrested men is Muslim himself. On the front page of the CBC’s website right now, they’re literally promoting a story claiming Trump is causing hatred here in Canada.

P.P.S. Our entire budget for this trip is $2,000 — that’s probably Mansbridge’s nightly hotel bill. Unlike him, we don’t get $1.5 billion a year from Justin Trudeau. We rely 100% on viewers like you. If you can help us, please do, by clicking here. And tell all your friends to tune into http://www.QuebecTerror.com too.

Terroristerne i Quebec identificeret

Filed under: Mord, Politi, USA/Canada, Vold — Hodja @ 17:40

The two men arrested following the deadly shooting at a Quebec City mosque Sunday night are Alexandre Bissonnette and Mohamed Khadir, Radio-Canada has learned.

Sources told CBC’s French-language service the identities of the two men on Monday morning.

Six men died in the shooting during evening prayers at the Centre Culturel Islamique de Québec (Islamic cultural centre of Quebec). Nineteen people were also wounded.

Police refuse to reveal any information about the men other than the fact they are in their late 20s or early 30s.

Police also said it’s too early to know the motive, what charges may be laid or when they will appear in court.


Her er et godt bud på de “vetting” proedurer, Trump har sat igang

Filed under: Almindelig fornuft, Donald Trump, Muslim World, Teknologi, TrumfEs, USA/Canada — Tags: , — trumfes @ 17:08

Vetting, altså checke at en person er, hvad han påstår at være , er ikke nemt


Daniel Pipes har her en rigtig god artikel om problemerne ved vetting
samt en række forslag til spørgsmål !

Jeg læste for nylig en interessant artikel om et automatiseret israelsk system til at vette folk – det er solgt til en række lande

Det kunne Trump også overveje !

Jeg har ledt efter det, men kan desværre ikke genfinde artiklen 😦

Læs hele Pipes glimrende artikel her

Hvad holder den arabiske verden tilbage ?

I følge Bret Stephens,Prager University , er det antisemtisme

Alt det han siger, er korrekt og spiller utvivlsomt en stor rolle i hvorfor den arabiske verden ikke er kommet længere

Men der mangler noget :

Stærkt medvirkende til at den arabiske – og muslimske ! – verden ikke er kommet længere er også Islam’s manglende selvkritik,
manglende lyst/evne/muligheder for at stille kritiske spørgsmål og ulyst til at lære fra andre lande

F.eks. fandt Arab Projekt ( under FN !) at antallet af oversatte bøger til arabisk siden 1500-tallet var mindre end det antal bøger, der hvert år oversættes til spansk !

Svenskere er så “kloge” at de kan undvære hovedet …

Her har vi en (halv)kongelig politisk korrekt tosse:


Det er sandelig godt at Sverige har den slags “kloge” hoveder

Bare se på Malmø, hvad den svenske “klogskab” har betydet for Sverige:


Taget herfra

Det er da helt utroligt at den “dumme” Trump ikke vil have den slags kulturberigelse i USA

Forstå det, hvem som kan … !

Taget herfra, hvor du kan læse mere

Milo lægger grundstenen til muren

Halløj ved Miss Universe konkurrence

Filed under: Donald Trump, Politik, USA/Canada — Hodja @ 12:18

CNN kilde bringer Fake News om angreb på moske i Quebec

Filed under: CNN, Journalister, Medier DR m.fl., Mord, Moske, Minaret, USA/Canada, Vold — Hodja @ 12:11

MSMs hysteri over Trump dekret om flygtninge m.m.

Venstrefløjen og MMS nærmest fråder af raseri over at Trump gør, som han har lovet

Jeg så (lidt af) TV2 “reportage” om dekret i går

Jeg skriver reportage i gåseøjne, fordi det ikke havde noget som helst med reportage at gøre …

Det var bare totalt ukritisk mikrofonholderi af diverse anti-Trump tåber
Selv ikke, da jurist og senator fra det demokratiske parti Elisbeth Warren ævlede løs om at dette var “a ban on muslims” , kunne mikrofonholderen fra TV2 rive sig løs fra mikrofonholderiet og stille et kritisk spørgsmål..

Han kunne f.eks. have spurgt , hvorfor det ikke gjaldt alle 57 muslimske lande, men “kun” 7 ?
Han kunne have spurgt hende, om hun vidste at de 7 lande var udvalgt af Hussein Obama og IKKE af Trump,
og Obama har flere gange gjort det samme – selvfølgelig uden hulk og klynk fra MSM og vestrefløjen

Men nej: det gjaldt bare om at læsse en masse følelsesporno uden baggrund over på licensbetalerne…



TV2 var – selvfølgelig – ikke alene om den slags “reportage”
Jeg så også DR og svensk TV klynke og rase over den væmmelige Trump

Derfor er det interessant at svensk tekst-tv faktisk havde den bedste oversigt over dekret, jeg har set ! :



Hvis du gerne vil læse hele Trumps dekret, er her et link

Men det er IKKE nemt at læse, der har været sagførere på det …

Nu er MSM og eliten pludselig meget hurtige til at benævne et angreb terror

Filed under: Multi-kulti, TrumfEs, USA/Canada — trumfes @ 11:30

Det kan meget vel være terror, men hvorfor er de så hurtige denne gang …

Svar: fordi det er en moske, der er blevet angrebet …


Når man betænker at angriberne brugte AK-47 , lyder det for mig snarere, som om angrebet er foretaget af en konkurrende muslimsk gruppe …

Men det vil jo vise sig

Taget herfra

Jeg har bagefter læst Uriasposten, som bl.a. skriver at canadiske medier omtaler de to arresterede som havende muslismke navne …


Det viser sig af angriberne (ifølge The Mirror) har åbet Allahu Achbar !


Mere sandhed om Trumps ‘muslim-forbud’

Shia LaBeouf er en Komplet Idiot

Ku Klux Klan møde på Universitet