Hodjanernes Blog

31 januar 2017

Hykleriet er grænseløst

USA har åbenbart haft begrænsninger på muslimers indrejse siden februar 2016!

Så det er altså indført af mediernes og venstrefløjens darling Hussein Obama.

muslim_immigration

Hussein Obama bombede 5 af de 7 lande, som Trump lægger restriktioner på – medierne var ligeglade.

chartoftheday_7781_trump_wants_to_ban_immigration_from_these_countries_n

Trump har lige sparet USA og EU for nogle flere flygtninge …

Filed under: Donald Trump, Muslim World, Saudi, TrumfEs, USA/Canada, Yemen — trumfes @ 18:01

Trump har lavet en aftale med SaudiArabien om flygtninge fra Syrien og Yemen !

Ezra Levant mener at Donald Trump har udeladt SaudiArabien fra listen over terrorist-lande
og derefter forlangt noget for noget af Saudi Arabien:

Det ville forklare, hvorfor SaudiArabien ikke var på listen,
men det forklarer IKKE, hvorfor Pakistan, et andet land, der har opfostret mange terrorister ikke er på listen

Strengt taget burde Trump’s liste ( som jo viser sig at være Obamas liste) også have inkluderet muslimer fra Frankrig og Belgien, der har begået mange terror handlinger
Tag den, Hollande …

Her er en anden video om samme emne:

Det skal nok blive morsomt at se de (Soros betalte ?) evige protest deltagere protestere mod det

Obama var ligeglad , Trump indkalder FNs sikkerhedsråd om Iransk provokation

Filed under: Donald Trump, FN, Iran, TrumfEs, USA/Canada — trumfes @ 17:23

Iran har lige “testet” Donald Trump ved – imodstrid med Iran-aftalen – af fyre et missil af

Det har Iran gjort flere gange før, og derved testet Obama’s reaktion
Som ventet af Teheran var der inegn reaktion, det ville jo have afsløret at Obama’s “fine”
Iran aftale intet er værd og at Iran sk….. på den, når Iran vil det

Nu har Iran så fyret et nyt missil af – men Trump reagerer !

selection_588

England og Frankrig har før villet have sanktioner mod iranske brud på aftalen, men Rusland og Kina ville ikke

Det her kan blive en win-win situation for Trump:

– Hvis FNs sikkerhedsråd bøjer sig og pålægger Iran sanktioner,er det klart at der er kommet en ny sheriff til byen

– Hvis FNs sikkerhedsråd nedstemmer eller vetoer Trump, har han al mulig grund til at rive Iran-“aftalen” i stykker !

Taget herfra, og her ,hvor du kan læse mere

Herlig satirisk tysk valgvideo !

Den gør tykt grin med SPD (Tysklands socialdemokrater) og Merkel

🙂

Taget fra Vlad

Ingen kan sige det så kort og præcist som Donald Trump

Han får stillet et “standard” spørgsmål fra en “standard” journalist og lammer ham fuldstændigt

Det er tydeligt at “journalisten” bagefter ikke, hvad han skal sige … 🙂

Kun tåbelige “journalister” kan stille den slags “spørgsmål”:

selection_589

Selvfølgelig er ISIS sur: nu er det ikke så nemt at fragte terrorister ind i USA,
og hvem ved – måske lærer EU noget …
(læs mere her)

Taget herfra

DNC Chair Candidate Trashes White People in Bizarre Meltdown

Et klart flertal af amerikanere støtter Trumps indrejseforbud

A new Rasmussen poll finds that 57 per cent of Americans support President Trump’s travel ban on people arriving from terror-linked countries, with just 33 per cent opposing the measure.

Asked if they support a temporary 90 day ban on “refugees” from Syria, Iraq, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen, a clear majority of Americans back Trump, despite widespread media criticism of the executive order.

The poll also found that Americans support a visa block on all individuals from those same countries by a margin of 56 per cent to 32 per cent.

Imens får Løgnepressen det til at se ud som om ALLE er imod forbuddet – hvilket klart viser mediernes ståsted.

I DDR TV-Avisen i aften kl. 21.30 blev Johannes Hest Langkilde spurgt direkte: “Hvor mange amerikanere støtter Donald Trumps indrejseforbud?”

Man kunne se, at Langkilde var pinligt berørt, fordi han ganske sikkert kender ovenstående undersøgelse, men svaret var “Mange.” Seerne skal ikke vide, at flertallet af amerikanere støtter Trump.

Fake tears – Falske Tårer :-))

Filed under: Donald Trump, Grænsekontrol, Illegale, Politik, USA/Canada — Hodja @ 13:18

Flere Falske Nyheder fra Løgnepressen

Niels Lillelund: Sande rygter bringer vi gerne, hvis de ikke opildner til ‘afvigende stemmeafgivninger’

57.424 personer i Danmark risikerer ikke at kunne rejse ind i USA under landets midlertidige indrejseforbud for personer fra syv specifikke lande.

Det er det antal personer, som samlet set har et statsborgerskab i et af de syv lande på listen.

Det drejer sig om Syrien, Iran, Irak, Somalia, Libyen, Yemen og Sudan.

Antallet dækker over folk, der bor i Danmark med udenlandsk statsborgerskab – og altså ikke nødvendigvis folk med dobbelt statsborgerskab, understreger Danmarks Statistik.

Bureauet oplyser, at tallet derfor godt kan vokse. Men det kan ikke skrumpe, når myndighederne får overblik over, hvor mange personer der er med dobbelt statsborgerskab i Danmark og et af de syv lande.

Interessante tal

Trumpmodstandernes sko bliver mindre og mindre

Filed under: Donald Trump, Internet, Politik — Hodja @ 11:43

Lørdag aften amerikanske tid valgte Ivanka Trump så at dele et billede fra en festlig aften i med sin mand, Donald Trump-rådgiveren Jared Kushner, fra den sociale organisation, Alfalfa Club, i Washington.

ivanka

‘Underligt tonedøvt at vise denne glitrende, stanniol-kjole frem, når man tænker på den nuværende, humanitære krise,’ citerer det engelske medie Twitter-brugeren Josh Morgerman for.

‘Åh gud, verden er i flammer og familier bliver flået fra hinanden, men du er stadset ud i stanniol. Cool,’ skriver Christopher Ehlers på Twitter ifølge Independent.

Mere på metroXpress

30 januar 2017

Hyklere

Filed under: Donald Trump, Hykleri, Politik, USA Valg, USA/Canada, Venstrefløjen — Hodja @ 23:28

Rebel Media ved gerningsstedet i Quebec

Filed under: Kriminalitet, Medier DR m.fl., Mord, USA/Canada, Vold — Hodja @ 23:23

WOMAN WHO BEGGED FOR TRUMP TO BE ASSASSINATED GETS IMMEDIATE JUSTICE – SHE’LL NEVER DANCE AGAIN

Venstrefløjens selvretfærdighed vil fortsætte med at terrorisere os i det uendelige

Pop star Madonna let everyone know that in the era of Donald Trump she’s choosing love over hate—though the decision was apparently very difficult.

madonna1Speaking at the Women’s March on Washington, the aging “material girl” mentioned that she’d spent a lot of time wallowing in thoughts of blowing up the White House. Thankfully she decided against it though not because she had any moral qualms about terrorism. It’s just that, according to her, blowing up the White House “won’t change anything.” It’s good to know that Madonna opposes killing the First Family and a slew of incoming staffers for purely tactical reasons.

It occurs to me that Madonna was doing nothing more than virtue signaling—that is, demonstrating what a good person she is without doing much of anything. She wants a pat on the back for not succumbing to political terrorism as an outlet for her rage. If that’s not a testament to her loving nature, what is?

This is the same woman who produced a music video on the eve of the Iraq War in which she tossed a hand grenade at a George W. Bush look-alike. After filming, she decided not to release that video for fear that it might be misconstrued as anti-military. But can you see the pattern? Whenever someone Madonna doesn’t like occupies the Oval Office she indulges her darkest assassination fantasies.

Madonna’s speech, just like the march itself, relied heavily on the theme of love conquering hate. She began by shouting “Welcome to the revolution of love!” to the adoring audience. The crowd responded with about as many hoots and hollers as when she admitted her terrorism fantasies several minutes later. She ended her speech by leading the crowd in chanting “We choose love.” This basic dichotomy of love on one side—their side—and hate on the other, has become so hackneyed that I can hardly believe that people still use it; but they do. Like a one-trick pony, the American Left reaches for different variations on this dummy-proof bumper sticker slogan over and over again, usually to the exclusion of reasoned argument.

[…]

The reason this love-versus-hate juxtaposition is so often employed is because it’s effective. Why learn another trick when the old one works so well? Politics is a propaganda war and we conservatives have been on the losing side of it for a long time because we don’t see it for what it is. A well-framed, emotionally-charged slogan does more to persuade than a million think tank white papers. That’s just reality. The intellect matters less than the heart—and the gut matters most of all.

Far too often, conservatives’ ineffectual response to the love-versus-hate formulation is to point out that the other side is pretty hateful too. Which it is, of course, though I would caution against drawing any equivalence. While the Left is clearly nastier, they are also shameless which means that no amount of highlighting their vitriol ever makes them blush.

Even in Madonna’s speech, the one she kicked off by welcoming the protestors to the “revolution of love,” she still said “F–k you” to her detractors. And the crowd roared. But that’s different, you see, because Madonna was merely hating on haters. As the hack journalist Jonathan Capehart once said on MSNBC, tolerance “should not be a two-way street.”

And clearly it isn’t. On the same day Madonna spoke, across the country in the other Washington, a Trump opponent shot a man in the stomach outside of a Milo Yiannopoulos event, mistakenly believing him to the Trump supporter and a white supremacist. In reality, the victim was a Bernie Sanders supporter.

… Can’t you just feel the love?

‘Isolated incident!’ the Left shouts. Well no, not really. Episodes like these are beginning to feel like Groundhog Day, only less funny. The scene in Washington State wasn’t quite so different than the one in Washington, DC. On Inauguration Day in the nation’s capital 217 leftist “protestors” were arrested and six police officers were injured, in addition to lots of smashed windows and a few scattered fires. The AP report labeled all counter-Trump voices at the event “protestors,” even those who were clearly engaged in wanton destruction. Other media reports were quick to point out that the so-called protests were “mostly peaceful,” a throwaway line that reporters like to include whenever people on the Left engage in mayhem, lest anyone draw broad generalizations. Left-wing riots aren’t really riots, you see, unless it can be proven that every person in attendance took part. The old “mostly peaceful” canard is never used when the protestors are conservative. When conservative protests are entirely peaceful, the media focus instead on what potential violence might happen in the future or on the protestors’ “tone.”

It seems that there are so many “isolated incidents” of leftist mayhem that we should stop seeing each one in a vacuum. For those with eyes to see there is a clear pattern. Leftists convince us to ignore the pattern by accusing us of judging the “protestors” by a few supposed bad apples. Funny how many bad apples seem show up at anti-Trump rallies all across the country, just as they showed up at Black Lives Matter events, Occupy events, anti-Iraq War events, anti-WTO events, and wherever else two or more leftists scheme.

What happened in DC was not a peaceful protest gone wrong. It was a pre-meditated riot gone right. Responsible journalists should stop talking about it as if it were anything else.

Of course, not everyone in attendance necessarily got the memo that the whole thing was slated to be an orgy of destruction, though they would have to have been naïve not to foresee what eventually happened. An organized coalition promised that they would wreak so much havoc that DC would be shut down. Does that mean that every protestor who attended was part of this coalition? No, though they would have been treated that way if it had been conservatives crashing a hypothetical Hillary inauguration. Even still, anyone who attended the Washington riot and pretends that he thought he was taking part in a nonviolent protest is either lying or stupid.

Yet no matter how many times we point out that there is just as much hate on their side—if not more—they brush it off. In their minds, their hate is not hate because they only hate people who deserve it. Never for a moment do these people lose faith in their own goodness. They don’t doubt that they are the most benevolent, the most open-minded, and the most accepting of all people; in other words, that they are liberals in the truest and finest sense of the word. If they occasionally fantasize about killing the president that’s not really hate because a) they don’t actually follow through with it, and b) the president kind of deserves it.

My hope is that some day the scales will fall from their eyes and they will see what grotesque monsters they have become. It’s a long shot, I know, but it may be our only chance for survival. As long as the Left remains self-righteousness, it will continue to terrorize the rest of us. If only we could strip them of their unshakeable conviction that they are the good guys they might start to see what demented psychos they have become. This is will be no easy task, of course, because most leftists have dehumanized their opponents so thoroughly that they don’t see hating them as a fault. It isn’t even hate. …

Skriver Benny Huang via No-Pasaran: https://no-pasaran.blogspot.dk/2017/01/isolated-incident-violent-episodes-from.html

Rebel Media om terroren i Quebec

Filed under: Kriminalitet, Mord, Moske, Minaret, Terror i Danmark, USA/Canada, Vold — Hodja @ 20:40

What’s really going on at the mosque in Quebec City?

Last night, two armed gunmen burst in, killing 6 and wounding 19 more. It was a horrendous attack that must be condemned.

And immediately it was. But within minutes, before any facts were in, the mainstream media had already made up their mind about what happened: it was “Islamophobia”. Some journalists — and even a Muslim Quebec politician — said that Donald Trump was to blame.

But an eyewitness at the mosque said one of the gunmen shouted “Allah Akbar”. That’s what a Muslim terrorist says, not an “Islamophobe”.

At their press conference this morning, Quebec police refused to name the two suspects taken into custody last night. Why?

But the names leaked out anyways: Alexandre Bissonnette — and a Muslim named Mohamed Khadir, who was later called a “witness” by police.

What’s going on here — did a Muslim attack a mosque? And who is Bissonnette — a friend of Khadir? A convert to Islam? Or an anti-Muslim murderer?

What are the facts? And can we trust the mainstream media to tell us the truth?

I don’t know the answers. But I know this for sure: we won’t get the whole story from the CBC, or the rest of the mainstream media. They’re less concerned about straight reporting, and more concerned with protecting the official narrative — Muslims are victims, not terrorists; Canadians are racists; anyone worried about radical Islam is a bigot.

You could practically hear their disappointment to learn that one of the men arrested last night is named Mohamed.

Well, we don’t know all the facts yet either. But unlike the CBC, we intend to uncover the truth, not bury it.

So this morning, our own Faith Goldy went to Quebec City with our cameraman Alex — as I write this e-mail, they on her way to the crime scene. She’ll ask real questions, and follow the facts wherever they lead.

We’ve set up a special website for all of Faith’s reports from Quebec — click here or visit http://www.QuebecTerror.com. Make sure you go there for the other side of the story, especially if you’re getting your news from the Trudeau propagandists at the CBC.

Booking a flight for Faith and Alex on short notice cost us $1,276. And two hotel rooms, for two nights, was another $560. Add in cab fare and some meals, and we’ll be close to $2,000. If you can help us crowdfund the costs of this trip, please do — by clicking here, or visiting http://www.QuebecTerror.com.

Thanks for your support.

Yours truly,

Ezra Levant

P.S. This is a very important story, and it will be covered extensively by the CBC — in fact, Faith told me that Peter Mansbridge, and his whole luxury entourage, were on the same flight to Quebec City as her.

You can see why: the CBC is already working hard to downplay the fact that at least one of the arrested men is Muslim himself. On the front page of the CBC’s website right now, they’re literally promoting a story claiming Trump is causing hatred here in Canada.

P.P.S. Our entire budget for this trip is $2,000 — that’s probably Mansbridge’s nightly hotel bill. Unlike him, we don’t get $1.5 billion a year from Justin Trudeau. We rely 100% on viewers like you. If you can help us, please do, by clicking here. And tell all your friends to tune into http://www.QuebecTerror.com too.

Terroristerne i Quebec identificeret

Filed under: Mord, Politi, USA/Canada, Vold — Hodja @ 17:40

The two men arrested following the deadly shooting at a Quebec City mosque Sunday night are Alexandre Bissonnette and Mohamed Khadir, Radio-Canada has learned.

Sources told CBC’s French-language service the identities of the two men on Monday morning.

Six men died in the shooting during evening prayers at the Centre Culturel Islamique de Québec (Islamic cultural centre of Quebec). Nineteen people were also wounded.

Police refuse to reveal any information about the men other than the fact they are in their late 20s or early 30s.

Police also said it’s too early to know the motive, what charges may be laid or when they will appear in court.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/quebec-city-mosque-gun-shots-1.3957686

Her er et godt bud på de “vetting” proedurer, Trump har sat igang

Filed under: Almindelig fornuft, Donald Trump, Muslim World, Teknologi, TrumfEs, USA/Canada — Tags: , — trumfes @ 17:08

Vetting, altså checke at en person er, hvad han påstår at være , er ikke nemt

selection_586

Daniel Pipes har her en rigtig god artikel om problemerne ved vetting
samt en række forslag til spørgsmål !

Jeg læste for nylig en interessant artikel om et automatiseret israelsk system til at vette folk – det er solgt til en række lande

Det kunne Trump også overveje !

Jeg har ledt efter det, men kan desværre ikke genfinde artiklen 😦

Læs hele Pipes glimrende artikel her

Hvad holder den arabiske verden tilbage ?

I følge Bret Stephens,Prager University , er det antisemtisme

Alt det han siger, er korrekt og spiller utvivlsomt en stor rolle i hvorfor den arabiske verden ikke er kommet længere

Men der mangler noget :

Stærkt medvirkende til at den arabiske – og muslimske ! – verden ikke er kommet længere er også Islam’s manglende selvkritik,
manglende lyst/evne/muligheder for at stille kritiske spørgsmål og ulyst til at lære fra andre lande

F.eks. fandt Arab Projekt ( under FN !) at antallet af oversatte bøger til arabisk siden 1500-tallet var mindre end det antal bøger, der hvert år oversættes til spansk !

Svenskere er så “kloge” at de kan undvære hovedet …

Her har vi en (halv)kongelig politisk korrekt tosse:

selection_582

Det er sandelig godt at Sverige har den slags “kloge” hoveder

Bare se på Malmø, hvad den svenske “klogskab” har betydet for Sverige:

selection_584

Taget herfra

Det er da helt utroligt at den “dumme” Trump ikke vil have den slags kulturberigelse i USA

Forstå det, hvem som kan … !

Taget herfra, hvor du kan læse mere

Older Posts »

Blog på WordPress.com.