Hodjanernes Blog

15 juli 2016

Kupforsøg i Tyrkiet

Kommentarer i anledning af terrorismen i Nice

PEGIDA Leader Tommy Robinson Threatened After Calling For Nice Attacks Response

Tommy Robinson, the leader of Pegida UK, has been attacked on Twitter by liberals following his condemnation of the terror attack in Nice as an Islamist atrocity.

French government ‘suppressed gruesome torture’ of Bataclan victims as official inquiry is told some were castrated and had their eyes gouged out by the ISIS killers

MUSLIMS MARCH THE STREETS OF LEICESTER ENGLAND UK 12 July 2016

The Worst of Black Lives Matter

Filed under: Mangfoldighed, Multi-kulti, Politi, USA/Canada — Hodja @ 15:39


Efter Nice

Nu snakker politikerne igen om nødvendigheden af at stå op mod terror, mens de udtrykker deres sorg over 84 nye myrdede i Nice.

Deres sorg kan de deponere et vist sted. Hvad vi trænger til er en Winston Churchill, der afstod fra at græde snot, men til gengæld gav morderne råt for usødet.Vi trænger til politikere, der

1) meddeler, at hvis beskyttelsen af danskerne kolliderer med “menneskerettighederne”, så et det menneskerettighederne, der må vige. Og vil domstolene ikke forstå det, må vi gå over til at vælge dommerne ved almindelige valg;
2) standser importen af muhammedanere;
3) lukker moskeerne;
4) gør det klart, at enhver, der har haft kendskab til en planlagt terrorhandling og ikke har fortalt myndighederne om det, mister sit opholdsgrundlag eller statsborgerskab og bliver buret inde, indtil han eller hun kan udvises. Og kan de ikke udvises, må de indstille sig på at tilbringe resten af livet i fængsler eller lejre.

Hvad punkt 4 angår, spurgte jeg en tidligere dansk imam, om der ikke var mennesker i det muhammedanske miljø, som var på det rene med, hvad Bas … Børge Hansen syslede med, inden han prøvede at skyde mig. Selvfølgelig var det det, svarede han.

Lars Hedegaard

Donald Trump on Nice Terror Attacks

HILLARY_MUSLIM

Så skal vi til den igen – for 117ne gang

Efter hvert muslimsk terrorangreb kommer den samme dans og snak fra politikere

pardon-our-muslims

Nice2016-1

Her er et standard eksempel fra vores justitsminister Søren VATpind:

VatPind

jo, Søren Vatpind, vi ER i krig med Islam eller rettere Islam er i krig mod os !

Det kan flere og flere borgere i Danmark,Frankrig og EU se.
Det er derfor at flere og flere stemmer på partier, som har set denne sandhed !

196715_5_

Og ja, inden du/andre begynder på det sædvanlige relativistiske pjat:
Selvfølgelig ved vi godt at det ikke er alle muslimer, som går ind for terror,
men næsten al terror begås af muslimer

Vi skal igen til at se politikerne – i alle lande – prædike at NU skal der gøres noget,
Nu skal vi bekæmpe terrorismen …

Men – selvfølgelig – UDEN at definere, hvorfra terrorismen stammer – for det ville jo være synd

global war

Hvis man ikke er villig til at erkende at Islam opfatter verdenen som opdelt i to:
Dar-al-islam : Islams hus, hvor Islam allerede er ved magten

og

Dar-alHarb : Krigens hus, der , hvor Islam skal komme til magten

Så kan man ikke effektivt bekæmpe muslimsk terror .

Det er ikke nogen tilfældighed at de råber : Alahu-Achbar : Allah er størst, når de myrder løs

De ord er vigtige , fordi de forklarer hvorfor de myrder løs:

just word

Her er en video med Newt Gingrich, en mulig Trump vicepræsidentkamdidat.
Han mener også at vesten er i krig og kommer med konkrete forslag mod terroristerne:

Uhyggelig video fra Nice af den muslimske terrorists ofre

Igen er Frankrig ramt af terror – hvornår gør politikerne noget effektivt ?

Næppe før den næste præsident hedder Marine Le Pen og mon ikke franskmændene vælger hende næste gang
De har prøvet Sarcocy – han gjorde intet andet end at snakke
De har prøvet Hollande – han gjorde/gør intet andet end at snakke

Hvordan kan en lastvogn få lov til at pløje sig igennem en 2 km lang menneskemængde ?

2 kilometer !

Det logiske spørgsmål stilles af Jyllandspostens journalist :

hvordan

Og han sammenligner med Israel, der har haft en del af den type terror:

Israel

Her er et link til en sikkerhedsekspert, der bekræfter , hvad Jyllandsposten skriver

Læg mærke til rækkefølgen:

Først prøves en “ny” muslimsk terrormetode af i Israel

Når Israel så lærer at bekæmpe den, skiftes fokus til Europa, der aldrig synes at ville lære af Israel . . .

Taget herfra

Dealing with Death Threats (David Wood)

Anyone who criticizes Muhammad and the Quran is bound to receive death threats.

In this video, David Wood explains how he dealt with a recent threat.

Islamvasionen af Østrig fortsætter – Balkanruten er ikke lukket

Seksuelle overgreb fortsætter med at stige.

Gun and truck attack leaves 84 dead in Nice

Men, women and kids strewn across road after lorry speeds for a MILE through holiday crowd watching fireworks, before gunman opens fire

  • Death is at 84 and rising, and 50 have been injured in a Bastille Day terror attack in Nice on the French Riviera
  • Eyewitnesses said the driver crashed his truck into a group of people, jumped down and opened fire with a gun
  • Thousands of people were in the southern French city watching fireworks display when the horrific attack began
  • Police confirmed identity documents belonging to a French Tunisian man, 31, from Nice were found in the truck
  • French President Francois Hollande confirmed children among dead and called it ‘undeniable’ it was terror attack

Mere på Daily Mail

Nice France lorry ploughs into Crowd. ISIS terrorist attack. 40 killed and 150 injured

BREAKING NEWS: Breaking panic Truck crashes into crowd at French Bastille Day celebration in Nice

USA: Efter Servergate er retssamfundet en vittighed

“Laws are just words on a page to be rewritten by and for powerful people.”

Comey’s rationale for not referring the Clinton case for prosecution defied all logic and, according to former assistant US Attorney Andy McCarthy, represented an on-the-spot revision of federal law. McCarthy wrote:

 “There is no way of getting around this: According to Director James Comey (disclosure: a former colleague and longtime friend of mine), Hillary Clinton checked every box required for a felony violation of Section 793(f) of the federal penal code (Title 18): With lawful access to highly classified information she acted with gross negligence in removing and causing it to be removed it from its proper place of custody, and she transmitted it and caused it to be transmitted to others not authorized to have it, in patent violation of her trust. Director Comey even conceded that former Secretary Clinton was ‘extremely careless’ and strongly suggested that her recklessness very likely led to communications (her own and those she corresponded with) being intercepted by foreign intelligence services.”

Yes, she did all of things and more. According to Director Comey, Hillary’s saving grace was her supposed lack of intent to break the law. She didn’t mean to do what she did, you see. There are two responses to this. First, yes there was her intention. Hillary Clinton didn’t set up her illegal email server by accident. She didn’t use it for all of her correspondence by chance. She didn’t wipe the server by bumbling error, an issue I noticed Comey did not even address. But the second response is even more important: intent is not the legal standard; negligence is. Even his whitewash investigation found that she and her staff were “extremely careless” with classified information. Carelessness is a synonym for negligence.

So Hillary will skate. Director Comey dished out the only punishment she will likely ever face—a stern talking-to. Start printing invitations for the Inaugural Ball—Hillary’s going to be our next president!

As I sat listening to Comey’s remarks, my mind wandered to President Gerald Ford, who inherited the office after the Watergate scandal. At his August 1974 inauguration, Ford tried to assuage the public’s anger with assurances that justice had been done. “My fellow Americans,” said the newly minted president, “our long national nightmare is over. Our Constitution works; our great Republic is a government of laws and not of men.”

[…]

Richard Nixon was not charged with anything and he was in fact pardoned. It should be noted here that at least Nixon paid some price: the not insignificant loss of his elected office. Hillary Clinton, on the other hand, is on the fast track to becoming the next president. That’s the difference.

Three years after Nixon resigned he sat for a series of interviews with David Frost, a British journalist and television host. Perhaps the most memorable quote came when Nixon said “I’m saying that when the president does it that means that it’s not illegal.” People were rightfully shocked.

Nixon’s governing philosophy, so in-eloquently blurted out on national television, is probably more common among powerful people than we’d like to believe. Though Hillary Clinton has never said those exact words, she conducts herself as if she believes them.

[…]

Once you understand that laws are just a lot of useless paper, all of our endless squabbling seems pretty silly. What’s the point of learned men standing around in a courtroom arguing the finer points of the law when in the end it means whatever the judge decides it means? It’s not good enough to have the law on your side. That’s actually quite irrelevant. You have to have the judges on your side.

[…]

Who cares what the law actually says? Let’s determine what Congress meant, rather than what was debated and voted on.

These people are just making it up as they go along. They decide the hot button issues of the day according to their preferences then go in search of a justification. No justification is too lame because they’re the supremes and we’re not.

This is the way we do things in America these days. The law isn’t really the law. Powerful people do whatever the heck they feel like doing and if the law gets in their way it is magically rewritten on the spot. Sometimes it’s the FBI director who decides to change the plain meaning of a statute. Sometimes it’s a judge. It can be the president, or even on occasion, a backroom bureaucrat. Beneath the tissue-thin pretense of an orderly, principled system, it’s actually just a naked power struggle—and we’re losing.

Benny Huang på Freedom Daily via No Pasaran