Hodjanernes Blog

14 september 2013

Nu er det tilladt at kalde konspirationsteoretikeren Niels Harrit ‘Tosse’

Filed under: 9/11, Danmark, Evidens, Historie, Holocaust, Loonies, USA/Canada — Tags: , , — Hodja @ 21:20

Den pensionerede kemi-lektor Niels Harrit har i dag (13/9) ved Københavns Byret tabt en injuriesag, som han havde anlagt mod en journalist og en chefredaktør fra Weekendavisen.

Niels Harrit er kendt for at være skeptisk omkring de officielle forklaringer omkring sammenstyrtningen af World Trade Center i New York den 11. september 2001 En formulering i en artikel i Weekendavisen fra december 2012 var faldet Niels Harrit for brystet. Og på den baggrund anlagde han injuriesag mod avisen.

Weekendavisen skrev dengang i forbindelse med en omstridt udstilling på Den Sorte Diamant om folkemord på armenere:

»Skal vi have en planche med kreationistisk plattenslageri op at hænge på en af Danmarks fineste oplysningsinstitutioner? Hvorfor ikke bare invitere Niels Harrit og de andre tosser fra 9/11-skeptikermiljøet, nu vi er i gang? Hvad med holocaustbenægter-miljøet?«

Mere på Pølletiken

‘Skeptisk’? Manden er jo helt ude af en tangent.

Thomas Sowell om Obama og Syrien

When he was in the Senate, Obama — along with Senators Joe Biden, Chuck Hagel and Hillary Clinton — was critical of the Bush administration for not being favorable to the Assad regime.

Hillary Clinton said that she and other lawmakers who visited Assad considered him a “reformer.” Back in 2007, when Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice appeared before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, both Senator Biden and Senator Hagel chided her for not being more ready to negotiate with Assad.

Senator John Kerry in 2009 said, “Syria is an essential player in bringing peace and stability to the region.”

Some people said that having Joe Biden as Vice President meant that President Obama had someone with many years of foreign policy experience. What they ignored was that Biden had decades of experience being wrong on foreign policy issues, time and time again.

Biden opposed President Ronald Reagan’s military buildup that countered the Soviet Union’s buildup, and helped bring about both the end of the Cold War and the end of the Soviet Union. General David Petraeus’ “surge” strategy that greatly reduced the terrorist attacks in Iraq was opposed in 2007 by Senator Biden, who said, “We need to stop the surge and start to get our troops out.”

Senator Hillary Clinton not only opposed the surge from the outset, she was among those who refused to believe that it had succeeded, even after all the hard evidence had convinced most other people.

The grim reality is that key people in positions to shape our foreign policy during the Obama administration — the President, the Vice President, two Secretaries of State, and the current Secretary of Defense — all have a track record of grossly misconceiving the issues, our enemies and our national interest.

This is the administration that is now asking for a blank check from Congress to take unspecified military action to achieve unspecified goals.

“Military action” is a polite phrase for killing people. It would be nice to believe that this has some larger purpose than saving Barack Obama from political embarrassment, after having issued an ultimatum without having thought through what he would do if that ultimatum was ignored.

Mere på Capitalism Magazine

Så Socialkrobaterne og Waffen-SF vil have os til at gå med på en uigennemtænkt blanko-check til uspecificerede militæraktioner med uspecificerede mål.

Sjældent har jeg set en mere latterlig Barroso fra EU

Filed under: EU, Greenies, TrumfEs, UKIP, Videnskab — Tags: , , — trumfes @ 12:29

Her er en interessant video fra EU:

Først kritiserer Nigel Farage Barosso EUs underlige klimapolitik. Så ser vi en nærmest hysterisk Barroso svare.

Han påstår at 99 % af alle videnskabsmænd er “enige” om menneskeskabt global opvarmning.

For det første er dette tal helt forkert. Jeg tvivler på at det endda skulle være så højt som 50 %.

Men det afgørende – og det undlod Farage underligt nok at nævne i sit modsvar – er IKKE hvor mange procent af videnskabsmænd, der mener det eller det andet. Det afgørende er om de har ret.

Tænk bare på situationen i 1905, da Einstein – ene mand – totalt ændrede vores opfattelse af tid og rum.
Hvis der havde været en “afstemning” blandt videnskabsfolk i 1905, havde den sikkert faldet ud til fordel for den newtonske opfattelse af tid og rum med 99,999999 % og kun 0,000001 for Einstein
einstein
Og alligevel havde Einstein 100 % ret.

EU trænger i den grad til en indsprøjtning af demokrati og sund fornuft. Og den kommer ikke fra (ex-? ) maoisten Barroso.

Taget herfra

12 år efter 9/11 sender Hussein Obama våben til Al-Qaeda

12 years later, we are back to arming radical Muslims, having forgotten, with stunning speed, the lessons of the previous 30 years.

12 years later we have come full circle. We all understand that the enemy of my enemy is my friend. It served as the basis of our Cold War foreign policy stance towards revolutions and civil wars around the globe.

But when the enemy of my enemy, is also my enemy, it would seem as though choices for options range between “absolutely not” and “this is a terrible idea.”

Mere på Washington Times