Hodjanernes Blog

2 december 2012

Pia K. revser Elbæk: Magtarrogance og kammerateri

Filed under: Danmark, Folketinget, Politik, Radikale — Tags: , , — Hodja @ 15:28

Pia Kjærsgaard langer ud efter kulturminister Uffe Elbæk, der er kommet i søgelyset, efter han har afholdt flere arrangementer på et sted, hvor hans mand arbejder i et job han fik uden stillingsopslag.

190px-Uffe-Elb%c3%a6k

Foto: Klaus Holsting

Pia Kjærsgaard er ikke bleg for at sende hårde ord mod den radikale minister. Hun mener, at sagen »lugter langt væk«.
Uffe Elbæk har gjort det før.

Islams syge dødskultur: En syrisk dreng graver sin egen grav i forventning om at blive martyr

Åbent klima brev til FN’s Generalsekretær Ban Ki-Moon fra mere end 125 videnskabsmænd

Den nuværende forskning understøtter IKKE FN’s holdninger til klima og vejr.

We the undersigned, qualified in climate-related matters, wish to state that current scientific knowledge does not substantiate your assertions.

The U.K. Met Office recently released data showing that there has been no statistically significant global warming for almost 16 years. During this period, according to the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations rose by nearly 9% to now constitute 0.039% of the atmosphere. Global warming that has not occurred cannot have caused the extreme weather of the past few years. Whether, when and how atmospheric warming will resume is unknown. The science is unclear. Some scientists point out that near-term natural cooling, linked to variations in solar output, is also a distinct possibility.

The “even larger climate shocks” you have mentioned would be worse if the world cooled than if it warmed. Climate changes naturally all the time, sometimes dramatically. The hypothesis that our emissions of CO2 have caused, or will cause, dangerous warming is not supported by the evidence.

The incidence and severity of extreme weather has not increased. There is little evidence that dangerous weather-related events will occur more often in the future. The U.N.’s own Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change says in its Special Report on Extreme Weather (2012) that there is “an absence of an attributable climate change signal” in trends in extreme weather losses to date. The funds currently dedicated to trying to stop extreme weather should therefore be diverted to strengthening our infrastructure so as to be able to withstand these inevitable, natural events, and to helping communities rebuild after natural catastrophes such as tropical storm Sandy.

There is no sound reason for the costly, restrictive public policy decisions proposed at the U.N. climate conference in Qatar. Rigorous analysis of unbiased observational data does not support the projections of future global warming predicted by computer models now proven to exaggerate warming and its effects.

The NOAA “State of the Climate in 2008” report asserted that 15 years or more without any statistically-significant warming would indicate a discrepancy between observation and prediction. Sixteen years without warming have therefore now proven that the models are wrong by their creators’ own criterion.

Based upon these considerations, we ask that you desist from exploiting the misery of the families of those who lost their lives or properties in tropical storm Sandy by making unsupportable claims that human influences caused that storm. They did not. We also ask that you acknowledge that policy actions by the U.N., or by the signatory nations to the UNFCCC, that aim to reduce CO2 emissions are unlikely to exercise any significant influence on future climate. Climate policies therefore need to focus on preparation for, and adaptation to, all dangerous climatic events however caused.

Se underskriverne her.

Tag den Lidegaard og Connie.

Giv agt: Nye klimaløgne i sigte

Fredag den 30. november skriver metroXpress i en stor overskrift: “Al tvivl er væk: Isen smelter”

Overskriften baseres på en ny artikel i tidsskriftet Science, hvor 3 danske ‘forskere’ har deltaget. Avisen skriver “10 sattelitter, 47 videnskabsmænd og 19 års indsamling af data. Det var hvad der skulle slå fast, at isen smelter ved polerne.” Vidre skriver de: “I 2011 satte forskerne sig derfor sammen og blev enige om at måle og veje isen i fællesskab.”

Udover at den præstation at veje isen på Arktis, Grønland og Antarktis er en imponerende indsats, glemmer man at fortælle, at det ikke er ny forskning, man fremlægger, men at det drejer sig om en form for metaanalyse, som blot er en analyse af andres videnskabelige arbejder. Det siger sig selv, at det resultat, der kommer ud af en metaanalyse afhænger af, hvilke forskningsresultater, man vælger at inddrage. Forskerne kommer i øvrigt frem til at havene stiger 0,6 mm om året – dvs 6 cm på 100 år.

Hovedforfatteren til artiklen i Science siger i øvrigt:

Scientists note that current climate-change models predict that some parts of the Antarctic ice sheet will grow while other parts will shrink, and that parts of the Greenland ice also will melt. Observations have borne out these projections so far.

“The signals suggest there is no immediate threat” from rising sea levels, Prof. Shepherd said. “But we can at least warn people that there are instabilities that need to be investigated.”

Så drik lige et glas isvand til. Indenfor medicinsk forskning siger man i øvrigt, at hvis konklusionen på et videnskabeligt arbejde er, at der skal mere forskning til – hvorfor udgav forfatterne da i det hele taget dette studie?

Om metaanalyser:

The most severe weakness and abuse of meta-analysis often occurs when the person or persons doing the meta-analysis have an economic, social, or political agenda such as the passage or defeat of legislation. Those persons with these types of agenda have a high likelihood to abuse meta-analysis due to personal bias. For example, researchers favorable to the author’s agenda are likely to have their studies cherry picked while those not favorable will be ignored or labeled as “not credible”. In addition, the favored authors may themselves be biased or paid to produce results that support their overall political, social, or economic goals in ways such as selecting small favorable data sets and not incorporating larger unfavorable data sets.

Angående afsmeltning af havis:

Angående argumenter for og imod – se diskussionen under filmen på Youtube.

Porno er jødernes hemmelige våben mod verdens muslimer

Latma TV

Filed under: Antisemitisme, Internationalt, Israel, Jihad, Medier DR m.fl., Muslim World — Tags: — Hodja @ 00:41

Israel – en apartheid stat?