Hodjanernes Blog

28 juli 2011

Beirut singer jailed for song telling president: Go home

Filed under: Hodja, Islam, Musik, Palæstina - Libanon, Ytringsfrihed — Tags: — Hodja @ 23:59

Frontman Zeid Hamdan of the Lebanese band Zeid and the Wings and defunct Soapkills was arrested Wednesday on charges that he defamed the Lebanese president in the song “General Suleiman.”

The arrest came after Interior Minister Marwan Charbel saw a video for the song, which was made in 2010, and claimed it was offensive to the country’s president, Lebanese newspaper The Daily Star reported.

 

Pas på hvem du går i seng med

Filed under: Antisemitisme, Gaza, Hodja, Israel, Palæstina - Libanon — Tags: , — Hodja @ 23:44

No porn or prostitution’: Islamic extremists set up Sharia law controlled zones in British cities

Islamic extremists have launched a poster campaign across the UK proclaiming areas where Sharia law enforcement zones have been set up.

Communities have been bombarded with the posters, which read: ‘You are entering a Sharia-controlled zone – Islamic rules enforced.’

The bright yellow messages daubed on bus stops and street lamps have already been seen across certain boroughs in London and order that in the ‘zone’ there should be ‘no gambling’, ‘no music or concerts’, ‘no porn or prostitution’, ‘no drugs or smoking’ and ‘no alcohol’.

Hate preacher Anjem Choudary has claimed responsibility for the scheme, saying he plans to flood specific Muslim and non-Muslim communities around the UK and ‘put the seeds down for an Islamic Emirate in the long term’.

Løgnagtig artikel i Politiken der groft overtræder sine egne presseetiske regler (igen).

Politiken påstår i en artikel, at flere navngivne danske og udenlandske blogs er medlemmer af et internationalt netærk (Civil Liberties Alliance), som massemorderen Anders Behring Breivik hentede sin verdensopfattelse fra.

Vi har ikke i sinde at begive os ind i en diskussion med Politiken, men vil blot gøre opmæksom på følgende: Hvordan kan man være medlem af en organisation, som man aldrig har hørt om, før Politiken bragte artiklen? Vi har ifølge sagens natur iøvrigt heller aldrig linket til ICLA.

Vi vil dog gøre opmærksom på Politikens egne etiske regler:

Journalistik
Politikens journalistik skal være kritisk, saglig, korrekt og fair. Og Politiken viser i sin journalistik respekt for menneskers privatliv, race, nationalitet, religion og livssyn.

Journalisten skal gå til opgaven med åbenhed og uden fordomme. Journalisten skal forholde sig kritisk til alle kilders motiver. Sympati for eller antipati mod en given sag/person eller løfte om solohistorier og andre redaktionelle fordele må ikke sætte den journalistiske hæderlighed, fairness og væsentlighed ud af kraft eller fordreje vinkling, sprogbrug, billedvalg og placering.

Oplysninger skal være korrekte og skal derfor efterprøves. Overskrifter, underrubrikker, henvisningstekster og spisesedler skal have dækning i artiklen. Det skal i artiklerne klart fremgå, hvad der er faktuelle oplysninger, og hvad der er citater.

Begge/alle parter i en sag skal så vidt muligt komme til orde. Den kritiserede parts synspunkter må ikke gemmes til sidst, men skal fremgå fra begyndelsen af artiklen og/eller i underrubrikken. Redaktionen skal gøre, hvad der er muligt for at sikre sig den kritiserede parts synspunkter. Hvis det ikke lykkes, skal det fremgå, at den kritiserede part ikke er hørt og hvorfor. Det gælder også, hvis den kritiserede part ikke vil udtale sig.

Som det er vore læsere bekendt, har vi her på bloggen en offentlig mail-adresse, hvorpå vi i tidens løb har modtaget utallige henvendelser af forskellig art – BARE ALDRIG FRA POLITIKEN, der altså beskylder os for at være medskyldige i massemord, og som IKKE gør opmærksom på, at de INTET har gjort for at indhente de anklagedes meninger.

Vi har egentlig kun en kommentar: Vi er ikke overraskede.

Læs John Hansen, Politikens kommentar.

Støt palæstinensernes menneskerettigheder

Hadprædikant går frit omkring i UK trods indrejseforbud

In an extraordinary immigration farce, Sheikh Raed Salah is free to walk the streets after he was released on bail.

Four weeks ago, the leader of the Islamic Movement in Israel was able to enter the country unchallenged, despite a banning order.

Now Salah, who has been accused in Parliament of ‘virulent anti-Semitism’, is using the Human Rights Act to demand his right to stay, and preach, in the UK.

[….]

He has already cost the taxpayer thousands of pounds in court and prison costs and the bill is set to rise further during a lengthy court battle.

Salah, who was invited to Britain by Left-wing Labour MPs, was in the country for three days before he was arrested, during which time he addressed two large meetings of supporters.

Mere på Daily Mail

Massemorderen en stor beundrer af Hussein Obama

The anti-Islamic website Islam versus Europe contains more quotes from Breivik’s postings on the Document.no website, including the following:

“I completely agree that Obama is a brilliant retoriker [rhetorician] and communicator, one of the best we’ve seen over the past 30 years.”

Mere på Family Security Matters

Venstreorienteret teolog skyder skylden for Oslo-massakren på kristendommen og højrefløjen

Rev. Dr. Susan Brooks Thistlethwaite, a senior fellow at the left-wing Center for American Progress and a board member for Faith in Public Life (a progressive, religious organization), believes that Christianity — and right-leaning political beliefs — are responsible for the tragic Oslo rampage.

In a Washington Post opinion piece entitled, “When Christianity Becomes Lethal,” Thistlethwaite lectures readers about the perils of “extreme Christianity” and the failure of believers to see the connections between their beliefs and associated violence.

[….]

Before continuing, it would probably be worth noting that Thistlethwaite is the former president of Chicago Theological Seminary (CTS) and a preacher ordained through the United Church of Christ (UCC). The infamous Rev. Jeremiah Wright has also taught at CTS and is, of course, ordained by UCC as well.

[….]

She goes on to explain that Christians are all-too-reluctant to see the connections between their faith and extreme violence.

I believe that certain theological constructions of Christianity “tempt” individuals and groups to violence; combined with right-wing political ideologies, these views can give a divine justification to the use of lethal force…

[….]

One wonders why it is virtually impossible for individuals to list a multitude of radical Christian murderers who have acted similarly? If these values are so widespread in Christianity, where are all of the other Breiviks?

[….]

Denny Burk, a Bible professor at Boyce College and a blogger, differentiates between “cultural” and “religious” Christianity, debunking the notion that Breivik is the latter (Thistlethwaite’s theories are built on the premise that he is, indeed, a religious Christian).

Mere på The Blaze

Information går Politiken i bedene

Det er ikke kun i Politiken at de “ekstremistiske” blogs bliver beskyldt for at have et moralsk medansvar for Breiviks massakre

Under den bombastiske overskrift: “Internettet er ny kampplads for de højreradikales krig starter Information sin hetz-artikel.

Underoverskrift: “I de seneste år er internettet blevet den yderste højrefløjs mødested, hvor bloggere og læsere radikaliserer hinanden og vender hverdagsbegivenheder til historier om islams kolonisering af Vesten.”

Der sættes altså lighedstegn mellem den yderste højrefløj og alle islamkritiske blogs – ingen nyhed her. Hvordan er det i øvrigt at bloggere og læsere radikaliserer hinanden? Det kunne være dejligt med nogle konkrete eksempler i stedet for sådanne diffuse påstande.

Det var her, norske Anders Behring Breivik hentede en stor del af sine politiske holdninger.”

Nå, hvordan ved Information det? Hans manifest er jo i væsentlig grad et plagiat fra den såkaldte ”unibomber”. Herudover nævner han hvis også Natos angreb mod Serbien som en af hans motiver for denne ugerning. Det kunne desuden være dejligt hvis Information gad at nævne at han begyndte sin planlægning længe inden de fleste af de her blogs overhovedet blev oprettet.

Så følger et par afsnit som måske kan forsvares og så kommer følgende passage:

Et forsøg på at opbygge en norsk afdeling af det succesfulde English Defence League slog fejl, og siden en gruppe nynazister knivdræbte den 15-årige Benjamin Hermansen i et overfald, har de nazistiske grupperinger været marginaliserede.”

Man fornemmer tydeligt det mislykkede forsøg på at kæde EDL sammen med nazistiske grupper. Og hvad var det i øvrigt at Breivik skrev om EDL i hans manifest?

“I stedet for at indgå i organiserede, fysiske grupper på lokalplan, bliver højreekstreme derfor snarere radikaliserede af dialogen med ligesindede på internettet, påpeger forfatteren til bogen Eurofascism, Øyvind Strømmen. »Her kan de finde andre med samme ideer og skærpe hinandens synspunkter, så de bliver stadig mere ekstremistiske,« siger han. De radikaliserer så at sige hinanden. Denne type indflydelse ser ud til at have været langt mere afgørende i forhold til den ideologiske uddannelse af Breivik end for eksempel hans medlemskab af Fremskrittspartiet«.”

Igen en meget løs påstand, som sagtens kan diskuteres, men som journalisten undlader at sætte spørgsmålstegn ved. Kunne det fx tænkes at det var Breiviks personlige oplevelser i forhold til det kulturberigede norske samfund, som skabte hans radikale synspunkter? Eller kunne det skyldes, den manglende debat/demokratiske proces i forbindelse med omdannelsen af det norske samfund fra et monokulturelt til et multikulturelt samfund, som skabte det her skæbnesvangre had mod det etablerede samfund?

Øjvind Strømmen får lov til at ævle videre: ” Man kan ikke tilskrive bloggerne et direkte ansvar, men omvendt bærer de helt klart en del af skylden for radikaliseringen af en mand som Breivik. Det svarer til, at en radikal imam holder en tale i en moské, som får nogle unge tilhører til at gå ud at lave terror. Vi kan alle sammen være enige om, at en sådan imam ikke bare kan vaske sine hænder og erklære sig uden ansvar. Disse mennesker har fremstillet et verdensbillede, som har haft en stor påvirkning på en person som Breivik,« siger han.

Hvor er det lige at der på de her omtalte blogs bliver opfordret til vold, drab og terror? Hvor mange af de her blogs har ikke taget skarpt afstand fra den her handling? Alligvel er vi (bloggere) altså kollektivt medskyldige, mens radikale imamer højest kan have et individuelt ansvar.

Pamela Geller Statement On Anders Behring Breivik

Filed under: Bloggere, Islam, Islamisering, Jernhesten, Jihad, USA/Canada — Jernhesten @ 15:08

“Medierne forsøger at ødelægge modstanden mod jihad, ved at hævde at denne modstand fører til mord”

Hvordan føles det at blive citeret af en massemorder?

Filed under: Hodja, Kriminalitet, Norge, Terrorism, USA/Canada, Utøya, Vold — Tags: , , — Hodja @ 14:04

Salim Mansur on Anders Behring Breivik

At dø for Allah på tysk: Islamseminarer = Terroristskoler

De pæne og deres tone

I disse dage ser vi på baggrund af tragedien i Norge venstrefløjens bekymrede miner i anledning af sammenfaldet mellem de synspunkter, den norske galning lægger frem, og Dansk Folkepartis syn på islam og udlændingepolitikken.

Dansk Folkeparti har, siger man, ikke ansvar for galningens massemord, men man skulle nu nok alligevel overveje en revision af partiprogrammet, hedder det vammelt og fromt.

Og så den forfærdelige sprogbrug, lyder det helligt og forarget. I hvert fald skulle man tænke over, hvorledes man udtrykker sig, hedder det formanende.

Således foranlediget vil det være nærliggende at henvise til Geoffrey Cains bog ”Gensyn med ondskabens ikon” fra 2006. Her drages sammenligninger mellem tegninger og udtryksformer i det nazistiske blad Der Stürmer og vore dages politisk korrekte dagblades valg af tegninger og udtryksformer.

Der Stürmer tegnede jøder som svin. Ekstra Bladet har også tegnet Pia Kjærsgaard som svin. Og entertainer

Michael Carøe har fra scenen kaldt hende en so.

Der Stürmer tegnede jøder som rotter. B.T. har tegnet Pia Kjærsgaard som rotte.

Der Stürmer tegnede jøder som gribbe, og det har Politiken også gjort med Pia Kjærsgaard.

Der Stürmer tegnede jøder som slanger. Kristeligt Dagblad har bragt en tegning af Pia Kjærsgaard som slange og Information har tegnet hende som en modbydelig orm, der har ædt sig gennem en menneskehjerne.

Men det bliver værre endnu, siger Geoffrey Cain. Nazisterne anså jøderne for menneskelig afføring – dog uden at de blev tegnet som sådan i Der Stürmer. Men det er de blevet i Politiken af tegneren Roald Als.

Hvordan mon han ville have tegnet jøder, hvis han var ansat på Der Stürmer i 1930’erne? spørger Geoffrey Cain. Det forekommer mig efter læsning af Geoffrey Cain, at Dansk Folkepartis måde at tænke på og fremføre sine synspunkter virker helt søndagsskoleagtig i sammenligning med, hvad de politisk korrekte og hellige tillader sig.

Undertegnede er ikke medlem af DF, men jeg beundrer partiets folk for deres evne til at argumentere sagligt og sobert trods regnen af ukvemsord – og uden at skulle sammenligne deres modstandere med dyr.

Der spørges med rette, hvorfor Pia Kjærsgaard må have livvagter, men vi får ikke nogen forklaring fra de pæne.

Af John W. Hørbo, pastor emeritus, Jyllandsposten 28.7.2011 

Ondskabens Ikon kan downloades her.

Selvfølgelig – der er jo klart

Canadian Arab Federation official spreads conspiracy theory that Norway attack was Israel’s handiwork.

Michael Coren og Ezra levant om Anders Behring Breivik

Kulturberigelse i Holland

Over the past two years, 59 members of a Moroccan youth group in the Amsterdam Diamond neighborhood have been arrested 263 times for theft, assault, robberies and threats.

Together they received more than 27 years of jail time. This was stated by Amsterdam Mayor, Eberhard van der Laan while answering questions from the VVD Liberal Party. He explained that these youngsters caused mainly hindrance in the past but through the course of years, have turned into a criminal group.

Bad News From the Netherlands

Venstrefløjen skyder med spredehagl på alle sine fjender (dvs fortæller om det multikulturelle paradis’s fallit).

Det tyske socialdemokrati gør Sarrazin medansvarlig for Oslo-massakren.

Det ægyptiske forår

Filed under: Ægypten, Islam, Kirke, Kristne, Multi-kulti, Muslim World, Vold — Tags: , — Hodja @ 10:28

Muslim Attack on Christians in Egypt Provoked By Installation of Church Bell.

Melanie Phillips: Fanaticism, Mass Murder and the Left

In the Wall Street Journal, Bret Stephens makes a useful point – and also explains why the frenzy of demonisation being directed at writers and thinkers who were name-checked in Breivik’s ‘manifesto’ is quite so vile, as well as deeply stupid.

Observing that Breivik was neither Christian nor conservative but intended to detonate an apocalypse, Stephens writes about this particular pathology:

What it is is millennarian: the belief that all manner of redemptive possibilities lie on just the other side of a crucible of unspeakable chaos and suffering. At his arrest, Breivik called his acts ‘atrocious but necessary.’ Stalin and other Marxists so despised by Breivik might have said the same thing about party purges or the liquidation of the kulaks.

These are the politics that have largely defined our age and which conservatives have, for the most part, been foremost in opposing. To attempt to tar them with Breivik’s name is worse than a slur; it’s a concession to a killer with pretensions of intellectual sophistication. And it’s a misunderstanding of what he was all about.

Indeed. That’s why the relationship between even ultra-nationalistic thinking and acts of terror is very different indeed from the relationship between Islamist radicalism and Islamic acts of terror. The former is characterised by terrorism perpetrated in pursuit of discrete and limited aims. The latter aims to effect an apocalypse in order to bring about the perfection of the world. The former may be appalling in its effects but is nevertheless fundamentally rational since its goal, however noxious, is achievable. The latter is fundamentally irrational since its goal is a utopian fantasy. Consequently those who are in the grip of millenarian apocalyptic fantasies tend to be lunatics or psychopaths; and so it is as ridiculous to ascribe the pathologically murderous behaviour of Breivik to political rage as it would be to do so in the case of Stalin, Hitler or Ahmadinejad.

There is however yet another aspect of the millenarian mindset which should not be overlooked. In my book The World Turned Upside Down: The Global Battle over God, Truth and Power I consider at some length the millenarian fantasies not just of modern-day Islamists but also of the modern left. (I owe a debt of gratitude to Professor Richard Landes, who generously talked me through millenarian theories when I was writing my book some two years ago and whose own magnificent book on the subject, Heaven on Earth: The Varieties of Millennial Experience, has just been published.)

All the totemic creeds of today’s ‘progressive’ classes — environmentalism, egalitarianism, multiculturalism, anti-Zionism and so on — are millenarian, in that they all posit in their different ways the perfection of the world (just like, in their time, the Inquisition, Stalinism and fascism).

Consequently, today’s militantly secular leftists display some astonishing similarities to both modern-day Islamists and medieval Christian fanatics. There is the same belief in the Revealed Truth – Revealed, that is, to them alone – from which no-one is permitted to dissent. Anyone who denies it is a heretic and has to be destroyed. Because the left believes it embodies virtue — on account of its desire to perfect the world – anyone who dissents or opposes it is evil. Because it is Manichean, all who are not left-wing are right-wing (even if they are in fact liberal). So all who oppose the left are evil right-wingers who must be destroyed. That to leftists is a moral project.

They are therefore in effect a modern secular Inquisition. They are in the same mould as the religious and political totalitarian tyrannies of the past; they make in this respect common cause with the Islamists whose agenda poses a mortal threat to their own lives and liberties and most cherished beliefs; and they share the characteristic of a closed thought system which is totally impervious to reason and destroys all who challenge it with the monsters of history and Anders Behring Breivik.

That is surely why the left seized upon the Norway atrocity with demented joy and detonated a terrifying eruption of distortion and demonisation, irrationality, hatred and sheer blood-lust as it saw in the ravings of Anders Behring Breivik the mother and father of all smears which it could use to crush those who refuse to surrender to cultural totalitarianism. So those of us who fight for life, liberty and western civilisation against their enemies found ourselves – and by implication, the many millions who share these mainstream views – grotesquely damned as accessories to mass murder by those who actually cheer on religious fascists and genocidal madmen and who are set upon silencing all who resist.

The appalling actions of a Norwegian psychopath tell us next to nothing about our society. But the reaction to that atrocity tells us a great deal more.

Læs det hele.

(Millenarisme er forestillinger om en fremtidig og total transformation af verden, der bæres af tilhængere af religiøse, politiske eller sociale bevægelser; oftest drejer det sig religiøse forestillinger om verdens undergang, en ny tids komme og forventningen om en snarlig udfrielse fra den normale dennesidige verden)

Ann Coulter om GVM (gamle venstresnoede medier) og massakren i Norge

The New York Times wasted no time in jumping to conclusions about Anders Behring Breivik, the Norwegian who staged two deadly attacks in Oslo last weekend, claiming in the first two paragraphs of one story that he was a “gun-loving,” “right-wing,” “fundamentalist Christian,” opposed to “multiculturalism.”

It may as well have thrown in “Fox News-watching” and “global warming skeptic.”

Mere