Hvordan IPCC ‘videnskabsmænd’ modarbejder offentliggørelse af ubekvemme videnskabelige resultater og forsøger at redigere historieskrivningen

In this article, reprinted from http://www.americanthinker.org, two eminent Professors reveal just one of the many seamy stories that emerge from the Climategate emails.

A prejudiced journal editor conspires with senior IPCC scientists to delay and discredit a paper by four distinguished scientists demonstrating that a central part of the IPCC’s scientific argument is erroneous.

By David H. Douglass, Professor of Physics, University of Rochester, New York, and John R. Christy, Distinguished Professor, Atmospheric Science, University of Alabama at Huntsville

We will let the reader judge whether this team effort, revealed in dozens of emails and taking nearly a year, involves inappropriate behavior including (a) unusual cooperation between authors and editor, (b) misstatement of known facts, (c) character assassination, (d) avoidance of traditional scientific give-and-take, (e) using confidential information, (f) misrepresentation (or misunderstanding) of the scientific question posed by us in our paper, (g) withholding data, and more.

Læs hele artiklen på SPPI blog.

OPDATERING: Wikipedia – Sådan forsvandt klimaskepsis.