Hodjanernes Blog

4 februar 2007

Dilemma – practice what you preach

Migration skadelig for Jorden

Det stigende antal mennesker, som migrerer fra udviklingslandene til det overbefolkede Vest i en søgen efter et bedre liv, er med til at ødelægge planeten og bør undgås, siger tænketanken OPT (Optimum Population Trust).
Dele af verden, som er beskadiget af klimaændring, jorderosion og vandmangel ødelægges yderligere, når indbyggerne flygter.

I tilslutning til dette øger migranterne typisk deres ‘økologiske fodspor’ – den skade hvert menneske udgør på miljøet – ved at rejse fra lavtforbrugende til højtforbrugende lande.

Det økologiske fodspor af en person fra Bangladesh øges 16 gange, hvis han eller hun rejser til USA, mens en somalier, der rejser til Storbritanien, øger sit fodspor mere end 13 gange.

De migrationsøgende faktorer kan kun løses ved at reducere effekten af forbrug og befolkning i de rige lande og støtte miljøholdbare løsninger i de fattige, siger OPT.

OPT Professor Aubrey Manning siger, at UK er moralsk forpligtiget til at acceptere nogle immigranter, men “vores behov for immigration er lige så stort som vores behov for hul i hovedet“.

Fra News.com.au

FN’s klimarapport er politik – ikke videnskab

Washington, DC – Sen. James Inhofe, (R-Okla.), Ranking Member of the Environment & Public Works Committee, today commented on the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) Fourth Assessment Summary for Policymakers.

“This is a political document, not a scientific report, and it is a shining example of the corruption of science for political gain. The media has failed to report that the IPCC Summary for Policymakers was not approved by scientists but by UN political delegates and bureaucrats,” Senator Inhofe said. The IPCC is only releasing the Summary for Policymakers today, not the actual scientific report which is not due out until May 2007.

“This is nothing new. On November 15th, 2005, I addressed my colleagues in the United States Senate to express the importance of returning integrity to the processes that govern the work of the IPCC. I outlined several concrete proposals to reform the IPCC process during this Senate Floor address and in a subsequent follow-up letter to the IPCC chairman,” Senator Inhofe said. (Link) http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressRoom.PressReleases&ContentRecord_id=21CC88EC-CCA6-4A61-8C2E-78FA8DE4850D

“On December 7, 2005, I followed up my speech with a letter to the IPCC Chairman noting that the ‘science had been manipulated in order to reach a predetermined conclusion.’ Sadly, the IPCC has refused to make any of the reforms necessary to ensure scientific integrity,” Senator Inhofe added. (Link) http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressRoom.PressReleases&ContentRecord_id=B5B423AC-B42C-4879-91CE-348E78AAE64B

“The UN guidelines themselves mandate that the science be altered to conform to the Summary for Policymakers which is not approved by the scientists, but by political delegates of the UN,” Senator Inhofe said.

The IPCC concedes it alters the underlying scientific conclusions on page 4 of “Appendix A to the Principles Governing IPCC Work”:

“Changes (other than grammatical or minor editorial changes) made after acceptance by the Working Group or the Panel shall be those necessary to ensure consistency with the Summary for Policymakers or the Overview Chapter.” (Link – PDF http://www.ipcc.ch/about/app-a.pdf )

“You don’t need to look any farther than yesterday’s AP article about the UN IPCC meeting in Paris where political delegates are arguing about the final wording of the Summary for Policymakers. Riibeta Abeta of the island nation Kiribati, openly admitted to the AP that the Summary for Policymakers is designed to convince world leaders to take action. ‘The purpose is to get [policymakers] moving,’ Abeta said, according to the AP,” Senator Inhofe explained. (Link to AP article) http://www.breitbart.com/news/2007/02/01/D8N10JFG0.html

Related Link:

Media Covering Up UN Global Warming Report’s Political Agenda, Senator Inhofe Charges http://epw.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=Minority.Blogs&ContentRecord_id=79c41a1e-802a-23ad-40c1-210d91ac6afe&Region_id=&Issue_id

U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works

Er der nogen, der har hørt nogen medier fortælle, at den ‘videnskabelige’ rapport først kommer til maj? Nej vel. Læs for eksempel DR, som skriver “Det sker uanset FN’s seneste klimarapport som slår fast, at videnskaben aldrig har været så overbevist som nu om, at klodens stigende temperaturer skyldes drivhusgasserne og altså er menneskeskabte.”

de må jo være synske, hvis de har resultaterne fra en rapport, der først kommer på gaden til maj? (Selvom resultatet jo er givet på forhånd).

eller dette her – også fra DR:

“Det er over 500 ledende klimaforskere blevet enige om i Paris, hvor de hele ugen har været samlet for at blåstemple den nye, omfattende rapport fra FN’s Klimapanel, IPCC. Rapporten, der er ventet med spænding, fremlægges officielt her til formiddag.”
 

På engelsk har man et udtryk, der er meget passende: ‘You’ve been had’. Du bliver taget ved næsen.

40% af unge muslimer i UK forkaster Vestens værdier

40% af unge muslimer i UK mellem 18 og 24 år vil hellere leve under shariah end under britisk lovgivning.

Undersøgelsen fra sidste uge, iværksat af en britisk tænke-tank, viser signifikant tilslutning til anvendelse af slør i det offentlige rum, islamiske skoler og dødsstraf for muslimer, der konverterer til andre religioner.

13% af de unge muslimer beundrer organisationer som Al Qaeda, der vil bekæmpe Vesten.

Her er udtalelser fra unge britiske muslimer:

“The British way of life is unacceptable to Muslims,”

“It is wrong to drink. Look at all the deaths caused by drink-driving. It is wrong for women to wear skirts. Women should be covered up at all times, and it is wrong for British politicians to try to change that.”

“British law is not acceptable to Muslims – it is too soft. There are people committing horrendous crimes and getting away with it. Things would be better if we lived under Sharia law.

“We don’t want to be like the non-Muslims who smoke, drink and are promiscuous. That is why young Muslims are breaking away from British society – the cultures are too different. Blair and Bush are spreading the hatred.”

“All you read about is cutting off hands, stoning and beheading people. In fact, it is an entire way of leading your life in an Islamic state, as set out in the Koran, and allows Muslims and non-Muslims to live together peacefully.

“I would prefer to live under it. It is completely different to British law, which is man-made and laid down by a government which is all about greed, corruption and at the beck and call of big business with vested interests.

“I do not admire Al Qaeda, but they are trying to address the issues that all Muslims face, of subjugation of their lands, theft of wealth and oppression of their people.”

“Sharia law covers all our social and financial affairs as well as crime. We are supposed to give a fortieth of our wealth to the poor and are not allowed to charge interest on loans, for example.”

“I think an Islamic school would be a good option for my children. I went to a normal Western school and it messed up my head having to listen to non-Muslims talking about sex and rubbish all day long.

“The punishments under Sharia law are tough, but they do stop crime. If you know you are going to be stoned or beheaded for adultery, you don’t commit adultery.”

“It is easy to understand why young Muslims are turning their backs on the British way of life,” he says. “Your politicians tell us women should not wear the hijab, but you have naked women on the front of newspapers. Images like that lead to rape.

“If people start trying to tell us how to dress and behave, then of course there will be a backlash.”

“Since September 11, America has changed Westerners’ perception of Muslims. People think that Muslim men with beards and women with veils are terrorists. But if you get to know us, we are exactly the same as you, except that we have different ideas about how to live.

“We choose to live more modestly and cover our modesty.”

The ultimate goal of every Muslim is to establish Sharia law over the whole Earth,” he says. “It is a superior way of life and every Muslim living in the UK has an obligation to call for Sharia law to be implemented.

“We believe in jihad, which literally means to struggle. It is not allowed for a Muslim to obey a man-made system of laws that is prone to errors.

“Sharia law is a perfect system of divine law and order that the whole world should live under.

“Everything you have in the West is wrong. We should be in charge over you. If Sharia law prevailed, it would change everything.

“Alcohol would be outlawed and it would be illegal for any woman to leave the house unless she had her whole body and head covered. Everything would change for the better – it is sadly and badly needed.”

“The martyrs who carried out the bombings on July 7 were praiseworthy and correct.

“We have to spread Sharia law and put fear into the head of the enemy.”

“Muslims are peaceful, but the war really angered them. People got it into their heads that the only way to be heard and understood was to fight.

“There are lots of Muslims in this country now who have very strong beliefs, but they think the only way to put the point across is by force.”

“He took me to one side and said he wanted me to become a martyr, to become a suicide bomber.

“I was very frightened and said I didn’t want to speak to him and ran off. I think he picked on me because I am the smallest member of my group in class and maybe I looked like I would be easy to manipulate.

“I do not believe in extremism at all. I follow Sharia as a way of life because it has a strong moral code. Extremism is not a part of it.”

“Recruitment” procedures are taking place quite openly in a British mosque, that is an alarming development indeed.

Mere på Daily Mail

Hvis de så gerne vil leve under shariah, så behøver de da ikke vente på, at shariahen kommer til UK. Der er masser af lande, hvortil de kan rejse nu og her. Til glæde for både dem selv og europæerne.

ARLA på støtten

ARLA er i medierne denne week-end med regnskabet for muhammed-krisen. De påstår at have tabt 2 milliarder i indtjening ved handel med dybt korrupte muslimske diktaturstater.

ARLA er Danmarks største modtager af EU’s landbrugsstøtte sammen med DANISCO og Danish Crown, i Sverige er Danisco og ARLA de største modtagere: 

arla.jpg
I sidste uge var der en artikel i medierne, som angiveligt skulle have gjort rede for, at ARLA ikke tabte en krone på krisen, idet de skal have solgt deres produkter til underleverandører, hvorefter de blev solgt under andre navne. Jeg har ledt efter artiklen uden resultat? Nogen der har et link?

Veritas Universalis skriver også om Arla.

Enten tror DR at vi er naive eller også er journalisterne inkompetente

DR-P1 havde her idag i udsendelsen ‘Europa lige nu’ et indslag de kaldte: ‘Folkekirken som lobbyist i Bruxelles’.

Lektor Peter Lodberg, Formand for Danske Kirkers Råd blev interviewet om den Danske Folkekirkes forhold til EU. Han ser ligefrem gerne at den danske folkekirke havde en fast repræsentant i Bruxelles.

Der blev diskuteret om lobbyisme ud fra, at for eksempel den katolske kirke har lobbyister,  samt om religionen skal skrives ind i EU’s præampel.

Så blev det meget morsomt, for journalisten spurgte Lodberg, om han mener at islam skal have lobbyister i EU. ‘Ja absolut,” svarede han. Han mente også nærmest at islam også skal skrives ind i EU’s præampel på grund af den store betydning islam og Tyrkiet har for Europa.

Om islam skal have lobbyister i EU? Jeg synes det er overordentlig underligt, at der i en specialudsendelse i P1 tilsyneladende ikke er kendskab til EAD, Barcelona-Processen og Anna Lindh Foundation. Organisationer der i allerhøjeste grad fungerer som islams lobbyisme i Europa. Derudover er Folkekirkens repræsentant Lodberg åbenbart himmelråbende naiv. Hvad kom der iøvrigt ud af den danske delegation af præster, der var i UK for at studere dhimmitude? 

Er der nogen af bloggens læsere, der nogensinde har hørt ovennævnte Eurabiske projekter omtalt i DR? Jeg har ikke.