Hodjanernes Blog

6 september 2006

Offerrollen spilles for fuld udblæsning i begge TV-Aviser iaften

I både DR-TV-Avisen og TV2-Nyhederne vises der oprørte beboere og familiemedlemmer fra Vollsmose i Odense. De kan ikke få deres familiemedlemmers eller venners opholdssted oplyst af politiet.

En imam udtalte sågar, at nogle børn i Vollsmose ikke kan sove om natten, fordi der er blevet vist våben foran dem – af PET.

Hallo – hvornår går det op for dem, at det drejer sig om en terror-efterforskning. Og hvad angår imamen – så er det kun et svar på det:



At de unge fra Vollsmose skulle være terrorister- nej man forstår ikke, hvor de har det fra??? Som imamen siger – børnene i Vollsmose kan ikke tåle at se våben! Tror han, at vi er så dumme ikke at vide, hvad de sidder og sluger på TV i ‘Parabolland’? De, som har set Memri-TV, ved udemærket, hvad muslimske og mellemøstlige børn bliver hjernevasket med.

Engelsk hospital introducerer operationsdragt til patienter i burka-stil

Filed under: Dhimmi, Indvandring, Islam, Muslim World, Politisk korrekte — Hodja @ 20:04

Royal Preston Hospitalet i det nordvestlige England indfører en “inter-faith” operationsdragt til muslimske patienter, der kroppen fra top til tå.

Hospitalet udtaler, at interessen for dragten fra andre hospitaler har været overvældende.

En leder i The Daily Express har kritiseret dragten kraftigt og skriver “Hvis man vil bo i UK må man acceptere britiske standarder og den britiske måde at leve på. Den traditionelle hospitalsdragt er sandelig god nok til alle.


Ahmed Akkari i flyverskjul?

Hvad skete der med Ahmed Akkaris kone og barn, som han fik med her til landet på trods af, at de ikke tidligere har kunnet få opholdstilladelse? Og alle de andre som blev transporteret hertil uden indrejsetilladelse?

Bare en tanke jeg fik. Der  er så mange andre begivenheder, så han lever sikkert fedt og skjult sålænge, de overdøver hans sag. Håber der er nogen, der gør noget ved det?


Tim Jensen fører sig idag frem i medierne med begrebet da’wa i forbindelse med anholdelserne i Odense.

Han fremfører at ‘da’wa’ er en form for social aktivisme, og at det kan være det, de unge arresterede mænd har beskæftiget sig med.

Using Matthew Levitt’s book called Hamas: Politics, Charity, and Terrorism in the Service of Jihad he uncovers part of the deceit Hamas uses daily.
One of the deceptions Hamas uses is darwa (social programs; building schools, hospitals, etc). What might seem to be a good and noble thing is – in fact – quite the opposite: Hamas not only uses it to ‘help’ the poor, but it uses it, for instance, to hide weapons and explosives as well and Hamas uses its darwa to spread its hate filled propaganda and to indoctrinate children. Lastly it uses the ‘charitable organizations’ to collect money. Not just in the Middle-East, but also in the West. Hamas uses the money they collect via these organizations to pay for weapons, explosives and to ‘pay’ the families of individuals who blow themselves up in an attempt to kill Israeli civilians.

Fra The Hamas Deceit på The Moderate Voice

Ifølge medierne er en af de arresterede af palæstinensisk oprindelse. Han skulle vel ikke have tilknytning til hamaSS? Og hvor var han under Libanonkrisen?

Melanie Philips (Londonistan) i Daily Mail om ‘homegrown terrorism’

Many are tempted to blame the war in Iraq instead. This is surely a dangerously wrong-headed argument. Yes, Iraq — like other conflicts — is certainly used to whip up hysteria as a recruiting sergeant for the jihad. But the causes of radicalisation lie much deeper. After all, Islamic terrorists are being recruited from, or are attacking, countries which either opposed or have had nothing to do with Iraq.

Abu Hamza is said to have run his training camp at Mark Cross in 1997, four years before 9/11. And according to the Home Secretary, the first plot by British Muslims against Britain was hatched in 2000.There are two main reasons for Britain’s large number of radical Muslims. First, many came from Pakistan which had been radicalised by Islamic extremism.

Their continuing ties with their home communities resulted in the establishment in Britain, more than 20 years ago, of extremist religious institutions which taught thousands of British Muslims to wage holy war against the West.

The second was that, during the 1990s, the British authorities turned a blind eye to the many Al Qaeda radicals from the Arab world who set up shop in London after fighting the Soviet Union in Afghanistan.

The legacy of all this now demands a concerted resistance to extremism from both British Muslims and the British establishment. But both are singularly failing to deliver. Moderate Muslims were undoubtedly horrified by the airline plot. But the response to the plot by organisations claiming to represent them was simply disgraceful.

More than 30 Muslim groups, along with Muslim MPs and peers, demanded that the Government change its foreign policy in order to placate terrorists. This blackmail was followed by a demand from other representatives that a pair of Islamic religious festivals should become official holidays and that Islamic laws relating to marriage and family life be applied in Britain. These were not moderate attitudes.

In Australia, the government has adopted a robust approach to such extremism. It has said that those Muslims who want to live under sharia law should leave the country, and that Australian Muslim leaders need to denounce terrorism in all its forms around the world.

By contrast, rather than challenging the ideology driving Islamic terror, Britain remains paralysed by the back-to-front thinking which blames its own policies for the terrorism that threatens it.

This paralysis is largely caused by multiculturalism, the doctrine which holds that minorities cannot be held responsible for the wrong that they do since they are always somehow the victims of the majority.

This doctrine has pushed Left-wingers into the arms of Islamic radicals who are sworn enemies of the West. When Trevor Phillips, the black chairman of the Commission for Racial Equality, repeated his concerns about the failure of multiculturalism, London’s mayor Ken Livingstone jeered that he expected Mr Phillips soon to join the racist British National Party.

This was the same Ken Livingstone who last year publicly embraced as a ‘reformer’ Sheikh Yusuf Al-Qaradawi, the Islamic extremist who calls for suicide bombings in Iraq and Israel and perpetrates gross libels against the Jews. Yet despite such an endorsement of true racism and fascism, the Mayor remains popular — and still remains in the Labour Party.

Mere i Daily Mail

Præcis det samme sker herhjemme. Allerede igår så man den odenseanske imam sidde på TV og true Danmark for deltagelsen i Irak og Afghanistan. Og hylekoret skal nok blive endnu højere.

Australiens mufti truer regeringen

Filed under: Australien, Citater, Imamer, Indvandring, Islam, Labaner — Hodja @ 09:13

Som omtalt her for nogle dage siden, har Australiens premierminister kritiseret muslimerne i Australien for ikke at integrere sig, specielt med henblik på at lære engelsk og kvinderettigheder.

Nu truer Australiens mufti – den ægyptisk fødte Taj Din al-Hilali, som ikke selv taler flydende engelsk (nogen der tænker på Abu Laban?):

“And Sheik Hilali, the Mufti of Australia, warned that he would call on Muslim leaders at next week’s taxpayer-funded talks to attack the Government and demonstrate to the wider community “who we truly are”.He yesterday accused the federal Government of misrepresenting the Islamic community in line with “American and Zionist ideologies”.”

Mere på The Australian

Kan de folk andet end at true? Nå ja – jamre om deres ‘offerrolle’.

Hvordan skal vestens strategi overfor islamo-fascismen udfærdiges?

YOUSSEF IBRAHIM skriver i New York Sun at nålestik som man udfører i Irak og Afghanistan skal ledsages af en større strategi, der skaber et miljø, som forhindrer produktion af terroristerne.

1.The West needs strategies conveying to the vast majority of the world’s 1.2 billion Muslims that acquiescence to jihadists and their ideologies means a rupture with Western civilization. The consequences for this should be spelled out by withholding Western commerce, the Internet, arms, machinery, and know-how — all of which still represent the bulk of progress as we define it in today’s world. Imagine a ban on weapons and technology, on Microsoft and IBM, on Boeing, Ilyushin transport planes, and Airbus spares.

2. Draconian sanctions such as these should be applied in unison with Russia and China and clearly framed within the U.N. code. Islamic so-called moderate or client states including Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Indonesia, among others, as well as enemies such as Iran, should be provided with a yardstick to define the dismantling of the infrastructure and software of terror at home — in mosques, in schools, in theocratic institutions, and inside government itself.

That will demand total elimination of the madrassa rote systems, the restructuring of religious teachings, and the outlawing of political groups such as Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Muslim Brotherhood, which adopt religion as political vehicles.

3. In the West itself, the last vestiges of tolerance toward Islamic fundamentalism must be removed. Laws targeting extremist speech, Islamic dress, storefront unregulated mosques, and the traffic of immigrant Muslims who do not speak the language nor share the values of freedom must surface in the legal codes of America, Europe, and Australia. The West must clearly process the fact that it is facing an existential threat to its core values, and it cannot be shy about installing tools of war in its democratic practices.

Læs resten af artiklen.