Den uranske modtager af Nobels fredspris – Shirin Ebadi – skal en tur i galgen.
Tehran (AsiaNews) – The life of Shirin Ebadi, Nobel peace prize winner in 2003, is in danger. Ebadi has been fearless in denouncing the oppression of human rights in her country. The alarm has been raised by Rooz, a website for Iranian exiles, which deduces it from the “charge” made a few days ago by the official news agency IRNA, saying that Ebadi and her daughter, a student at McGill University in Canada, have become members of the Bahai religion. The Bahai are considered a heretical Islamic group, and are persecuted.
The accusation, according to Rooz, is a sham set up to disguise the intention of having the woman killed, or at least of frightening her to the point of making her stop her activities in favor of human rights, or leave the country.
The explanation has been given on the basis of the Iranian criminal code. Article 226 stipulates that the killing of a person is subject to ‘Ghesas’, or retaliatory punishment, “only if the victim did not deserve death based on the Sharia, and if the victim deserved death the murderer must prove that in court, according to set criteria”. According to Islamic law, apostasy, or abandoning Islam, is worthy of death. And her conversion to the Bahai faith puts Ebadi in this position.
As if that were not enough, a supplement to article 295 in the same criminal code stipulates that if a person kills another because he suspects that the victim deserves death, and this is proven in court, the killing is considered accidental homicide, and the author must only pay “blood money” to the victim’s family. But if the killer proves that the victim deserved death, he doesn’t even have to pay the “blood money”, and will not face any penalty.
It is in the light of these laws that the article deduces in the first place that “they want to convince ignorant forces that Shirin Ebadi’s death is necessary. Any Muslim who takes her life is not punished, and perhaps goes to heaven”. In the second place, “they want to frighten her to abandon all human rights-related activities or even leave the country”.
There are a mere 12 Million Jews in the entire world yet they have received 182 Nobel Prizes.
The Muslims number 1.4 Billion (with a very big “B”)… or 117 times the number of Jews! Based upon this 117:1 Muslim-to-Jewish ratio, one might expect the Muslims to have 24,920 Nobel Laureates.
They have NINE! and one of them [Arafat] is a murderer (Allahu Akbar, indeed!)
Og skal vi endelig tale om videnskab – altså ikke litteratur og “fred” (Harharharhar….hark) – så kan vi herfra kun se 2 – TO!








Det er godt nok ikke en trackrecord der er værd at råbe ( hurra ) allah u akbar af.
Comment af Santor — 15 august 2008 @ 22:42
@Skjoldyngling
Ej, hvad tænker du dog på??
Kan du ikke din islam-lektie?
Du ved da godt, at alt er forudsagt i islam, og alt videnskab udspringer fra islam!!
Det er kun OS vantro, der har uddelt Nobelpriser til forkerte videnskabsfolk!!!
Når ummaen indtræffer, så vil de vantro videnskabsfolk stå i kø, for at aflevere deres priser til de rettroende “jorden er flad” islam-kyndige!!
Tro mig
Comment af li — 15 august 2008 @ 23:06
… og Abdus Salam (Fysik, 1979) var beklageligvis Ahmadiyya muslim, hvilket betyder, at han er at betragte som vantro af mainstream sunnier og shi’iter.
Hvilket efterlader en enkelt (videnskabelig) Nobelpris. Til Ahmed Zewail (Kemi, 1999) og alt hans arbejde foregår i det vantro USA, som han emigrerede til, da mulighederne for videnskabelig udfoldelse i hans fødeland Egypten viste sig at være nær nul.
De muslimske (45-55, alt efter hvem man spørger) lande er videnskabelige sorte huller. Ingen forskning og ingen teknologi udspringer derfra, når først religionen har overtaget.
Comment af Poeten — 16 august 2008 @ 15:22
Kan vi ikke invitere hende til the på den danske ambassade i Teheran og venligt tilbyde hende en lang ferie i DK?
Comment af Ulla Lauridsen — 16 august 2008 @ 20:30
-> 4.
Det er nok ikke nogen særlig god idé, sålænge vi ikke ved, hvor mange agenter det er lykkedes præstestyret i Iran at sluse ind i Danmark under dække af, at de er fredelige ‘flygtninge’.
Comment af Fidibus — 17 august 2008 @ 14:52
Hm. Hun er jo en meget modig kvinde. Måske er hun med på at være lokkedue?
Comment af Ulla Lauridsen — 17 august 2008 @ 20:59
Hun har i hvert fald min fulde sympati – ikke at det hjælper hende en døjt…
Comment af Anna Lyttiger — 17 august 2008 @ 21:11
Hun vil sikkert også hellere over til sin datter i Canada, med mindre, hun har besluttet sig for at blive i Iran og blive martyr for menneskerettighederne.
Comment af Ulla Lauridsen — 18 august 2008 @ 08:23