De to slags dhimmier

FrontPageMagazine.com har et længere interview med Bill Warner, direktør for Center for the Study of Political Islam (CSPI) og talsmand for PoliticalIslam.com

Emnet er dhimmi-begrebet.

Det er en meget væsentlig artikel, som man bør læse i sin helhed - den burde oversættes til dansk.

Artiklen beskriver baggrunden for dhimmi-begrebet. Den viser at der er to dhimmi-typer, og at den farligste er apologet-dhimmien.

Med udgangspunkt i dette angiver Bill Warner, hvilke måder islam kan bekæmpes på.

FP: So what is the best way to wake up the dhimmis or, if they refuse to wake up, to defeat them? Tell us a bit about possible grand strategies.

Warner: The key to waking up the dhimmis is with two kinds of knowledge–history and doctrine. Our dhimmis suffer from wanting to do the right thing and they think that the right thing is to help the victim. And Islam always claims to be the victim. Dhimmis love a good victim story.

 We need to tell the history of the real victims–subjugated dhimmis, the Christian Arabs, Egyptian Copts, the Armenians, the African slaves, the Hindus, and the rest. We need to tell our apologist dhimmis these victims, the story I call the Tears of Jihad.

[...]

FP: Is there another front of attack on dhimmis?

Warner: Yes, the second front of attack on dhimmis is to use the doctrine of political Islam. It seems that every dhimmi has a Muslim friend or at least has read an article that says that the “real Islam” is peaceful, blah, blah, blah. Well, we no longer need the doctrine of political Islam interpreted for us by a “good” Muslim or the New York Times. We can go straight to Mohammed and Allah and see what they say. That is the entire purpose of CSPI’s books, as well as many others such as those by Ibn Warraq and Robert Spenser, is to expose the doctrine of political Islam.

[...]

Our target must be the near enemy—the dhimmi, the apologist and enabler of Islam. Notice I said—the dhimmi, not the media, not the universities, not the government. We do not have the financial or political power to attack organizations.

Læs det selv!